Skip to main content

‘Not a Fit or Proper Person’

Annie Besant’s Struggle for Child Custody, 1878–9

  • Chapter
Maternal Instincts

Abstract

Annie Besant (1847–1933) was a late-Victorian social radical who lost custody of her daughter in 1878 because of her advocacy of atheism and birth control. The sensational custody trial and the other legal actions resulting from it were a landmark in Victorian social history, as the fundamental issue of the rights and responsibilities of motherhood itself were hotly debated both in and out of court. The verdict of the courts in depriving Besant of her daughter because of her controversial views, a decision strongly supported by public opinion, offers a clear statement of the dominant Victorian view of the role of the mother, who was valued and judged by her social reputation rather than her relationship with her children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Works Cited

  • Anderson, Nancy Fix (1994), ‘Bridging Cross-Cultural Feminisms: Annie Besant and Women’s Rights in England and India, 1874–1933’, Women’s History Review, 3, pp. 563–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besant, Annie (1893), An Autobiography, 3rd edn (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1939).

    Google Scholar 

  • Besant, Annie (1878), ‘Marriage As It Was, As It Is, and As It Should Be: A Plea for Reform’; 2nd edn rpt. in John Saville (ed.), A Selection of the Social and Political Pamphlets of Annie Besant (New York: Delley, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Besant, Arthur Digby (1930), The Besant Pedigree (London: Besant & Co.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Besant, Arthur Digby (1947), ‘Dr. Besant as Mother, by Her Son Digby’, in James Cousins (ed.), The Annie Besant Centenary Book, 1847–1947 (Adyar, Madras: Besant Centenary Celebration Committee).

    Google Scholar 

  • Besant, Frank (1911–13), Parochial Diary, vol. 11 (unpublished) (Lincolnshire Archives Office).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bland, Lucy (1995), Banishing the Beast: Sexuality and the Early Feminists (New York: New Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonner, Hypatia Bradlaugh (1894), Charles Bradlaugh: A Record of His Life and Work by His Daughter, 7th edn (London: T. Fisher, 1908).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradlaugh, Charles (1878), ‘Personal’, National Reformer, 31 (20 January), p. 922.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekhar, S. (1981), ‘A Dirty, Filthy Book’: The Writings of Charles Knowlton and Annie Besant on Reproductive Physiology and Birth Control and an Account of the Bradlaugh-Besant Trial (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chorley, Henry F. (1836), Memorials of Mrs. Hemans (Philadelphia, PA: Carey, Lea & Blanchard).

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, Moncure Daniel (1904), Autobiography: Memories and Experiences, vol. 2 (New York: Houghton Mifflin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisinger, Elizabeth K., Robin Lauterbach Sheets, and William Veeder (eds) (1983), The Woman Question: Society and Literature in Britain and America, 3 vols (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemming, George Wirgman (ed.) (1879), Law Reports: Chancery Division, vol. 11 (London: William Clowes & Sons).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayawardena, Kumari (1995), The White Woman’s Other Burden: Western Women and South Asia During British Rule (New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Law Reports: The Public General Statutes (1873), vol. 8 (London: Eyre & Spottiswoode).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledbetter, Rosanna (1976), A History of the Malthusian League, 1877–1927 (Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Linton, Eliza Lynn (1868), ‘Modern Mothers’, Saturday Review, 29 February, pp. 268–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linton, Eliza Lynn (1870), ‘The Modern Revolt’, Macmillan’s, 23 (December), pp. 142–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Reformer (1877), ‘The Queen v. Charles Bradlaugh and Annie Besant’, trial record report, 30 (1 July), pp. 419–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nethercot, Arthur H. (1961), The First Five Lives of Annie Besant (London: Hart-Davis).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nethercot, Arthur H. (1963), The Last Four Lives of Annie Besant (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Public Record Office, High Court of Justice, Chancery Division (1878), In re Besant, Affidavits of Frank Besant, 9 April 1878, 14 May 1878, and 17 May 1878, J4/495/2265, J4/476/2983, and J4/495/3093; Annie Besant, 1 May 1878 and 16 May 1878, J4/476/2642 and J4/476/3049; Ellen Lumley Perrier, 1 May 1878, J4/476/2640; Charles Drysdale, 1 May 1878, J4/476/2643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Public Record Office, High Court of Justice, Chancery Division (1878), Besant v. Wood, Affidavits of Annie Besant, 5 August 1878, J4/504/5109; William James Jarmain [F. Besant’s solicitor], 5 August 1878, J4/504/5109; Edward Hervey De Jersey, 14 August 1878, J4/505/5293; Frank Besant, 7 November 1878, J4/507/5999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, Lawrence (1990), Road to Divorce: England 1530–1987 (New York: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Anne (1992), Annie Besant: A Biography (New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1997 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Anderson, N.F. (1997). ‘Not a Fit or Proper Person’. In: Nelson, C., Holmes, A.S. (eds) Maternal Instincts. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14534-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics