Life Underwriting and Information Technology
A crucial skill for success in insurance risk management is underwriting. It is a very complex decision-making process which involves the manipulation of many types of information on multiple levels. The actuarial design of the product, abnormalities that increase the likelihood of loss and the quality of the available data must be weighted and considered to resolve underwriting problems. This must be done in the context of a competitive market environment while balancing the expected claims with the expected investment income from the use of the pooled funds. Companies compete on product, price, financial strength and service. Underwriting plays a large role in the service aspect of the process of acquiring new business. Often the underwriting decision is based on incomplete and uncertain information. Nevertheless the quality and consistency of underwriting has a direct, long-term impact on the insurer’s bottom line, because the proportion of income paid for claims is greater than that paid to cover administrative expenses.
KeywordsRisk Selection Actuarial Design Home Office Life Risk Advance Research Project Agency
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Arnold WR, Bowie JS. Artificial Intelligence: a personal, commonsense journey
. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1986.Google Scholar
Aikins JS et al.
PUFF: an expert system for interpretation of pulmonary function data. Comput Biomed Res
1983; 16: 199–208.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Miller RA, Pople HE Jr, Meyers JD. INTERNIST-I, an experimental computer-based diagnostic consultant for general internal medicine. N Engl J Med
1982; 307: 468–76.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Hickman DH et al.
The treatment advice of a cancer chemotherapy protocol advisor. Ann Intern Med
1985; 103:928–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingsland LC III, Lindberg DAB, Sharp GC. Anatomy of a knowledge-based consultant system: AI/RHEUM. MD Comput
1986; 3: 18–26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Reggia JA et al.
Computer-aided assessment of transient ischemic attacks. Arch Neurol
1984; 41: 1248–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Bankowitz RA et al.
A computer-assisted medical diagnostic consultation service: implementation and prospective evaluation of a prototype. Ann Intern Med
1989; 110:824–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Johnson KB, Felman MJ. Medical informatics and pediatrics: decision support systems. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med
1995; 149: 1371–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Harmon P, Maus R, Morrisey W. Expert Systems: tools and applications
. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc, 1988.Google Scholar
Szolovits P, Patil RS, Schwartz WB. Artificial intelligence in medical diagnosis. Ann Intern Med
1989; 108: 80–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kassirer JP. Diagnostic reasoning. Ann Intern Med
1989; 110:893–900.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Forsstrom JJ, Dalton KJ. Artificial neural networks for decision support in clinical medicine. Ann Med
1995; 27: 509–17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Itchporia D et al.
Artificial neural networks: current status in cardiovascular medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol
1996; 28: 515–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Place JF et al.
Use of artificial intelligence in analytic systems for the clinical laboratory. Clin Biochem
1995; 28: 373–89.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Hersh WR. The electronic medical record: promises and problems. J Am Soc Info Sci
1995; 46: 772–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West D. Expert systems undergo renaissance. National Underwriter
July 29, 1996: 2.Google Scholar
Jones DC. Insurer’s underwriting staff gets ‘expert’ help. National Underwriter
October 5, 1987: 3.Google Scholar
Glowniak J. Medical resources on the internet. Ann Intern Med
1995; 123: 123–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Baker JH. Information technologies: strategic opportunities for the life insurance industry. Trend Analysis Program, American Council of Life Insurance, October 1988.Google Scholar
Sviokla, JJ. Knowledge workers and radically new technology. Sloan Management Review
June 1, 1996: 25.Google Scholar
© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2000