Skip to main content

Connecting IC to Shareholder Value

  • Chapter
  • 81 Accesses

Abstract

Let’s go back to Yankee Finance, the US-based financial company we introduced in last chapter. Their IC experience started from a simple management task, namely to monitor and predict shareholder value. This is nothing special or new. Many companies around the world have this same task as the guiding force behind management action. Indeed, the management of shareholder value as the ultimate goal of a company is now a deeply rooted concept, both in the theory and the practice of management. So, what does this purpose have to do with IC?

This chapter draws heavily on G. Roos & J. Roos, ‘Linking intellectual capital to shareholder value’, Working Paper, August 1997, International Institute for Management Development, Lausanne, Switzerland.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. This line of thinking translated into the typical planning model of scan-create alternatives-choose-implement, see for example D. Lynch: Corporate Strategy, Pitman Publishing, London, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See H. Mintzberg and J. Waters, “Of strategies, deliberate and emergent”, Strategic Management Journal, July–September 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  3. In short, social systems are complex adapting systems, regulated by chaos theory; see R. Stacey: Strategic Management and Organizational Dynamics (2nd edn), Pitman, London, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  4. H. Mintzberg, “The fall and rise of strategic planning”, Harvard Business Review, May–June 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. Stacey: Managing Chaos, London, Kogan-Page, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J.C. Collins and J.I. Porras, Built to Last, Century/Random House, London, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. Hamel: “Strategy as revolution”, Harvard Business Review, July–August 1996, pp. 69–82.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Among others, see G. Hamel & C. K. Prahalad: “Strategic intent”, Harvard Business Review, May–June 1989, pp. 63–76;

    Google Scholar 

  9. K. Weick: The Social Psychology of Organizing (2nd edn), Random House, New York, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  10. For more information on Skandia Future Centres, see D. Oliver & J. Roos: Skandia Future Centers, IMD case no GM624, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Skandia: Power of Innovation, Supplement to the 1996 Interim Report, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  12. For a fuller discussion of the Sencorp management model, see Chapter 10 in G. von Krogh and J. Roos, Organizational Epistemology, Macmillan, London, 1995.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1997 Johan Roos, Göran Roos, Nicola Carlo Dragonetti and Leif Edvinsson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Roos, J., Roos, G., Dragonetti, N.C., Edvinsson, L. (1997). Connecting IC to Shareholder Value. In: Intellectual Capital. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14494-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics