Skip to main content

The New Business World

  • Chapter
Intellectual Capital

Abstract

With an incredible US$168 billion in sales General Motors, a company representing the prosperous industrial era, again hit the top spot of the famous Fortune 500 ranking in 1996. From the perspective of the classical ‘factors of production’ — land, labour, money, and equipment — the US$222 billion of assets1 of GM makes it a very wealthy and indeed influential company.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. D.V. Fites: “Make your dealers your partners”, Harvard Business Review, March–April 1996, pp. 84–95.

    Google Scholar 

  2. W. B. Arthur: “Positive feedbacks in the economy”, Scientific American, February 1990, pp. 80–85;

    Google Scholar 

  3. B. Wysocki, Jr: “The wealth of notions”, Wall Street Journal, 22 January 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  4. W. B. Arthur: “Increasing returns and the new word of business”, Harvard Business Review, July–August 1996, pp. 100–9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. This activity is what Mintzberg and Quinn call pattern recognition, according to them a fundamental ability for managers today; see H. Mintzberg & J. Quinn: The Strategy Process (2nd edn), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  6. These commando units, by the way, bear more than a passing resemblance to the hunting organisation Hurst speaks of. See D. Hurst: Crisis & Renewal, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See F. J. Varela, E. Thompson & E. Rosch: The Embodied Mind, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992, for the autopoiesis view;

    Google Scholar 

  8. and M. Polanyi: Personal Knowledge, Routledge, London, 1958, for the tacit-explicit knowledge distinction…

    Google Scholar 

  9. This is what has also been called the knowledge-creating spiral: I. Nonaka: “The knowledge-creating company”, Harvard Business Review, November–December 1991, pp. 96–104.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See for example G. von Krogh & J. Roos: “Conversation management”, European Management Journal, XIII, (4), 1995, pp. 390–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. G. Hamel & C. K. Prahalad: “Strategic intent”, Harvard Business Review, May–June 1989, pp. 63–76;

    Google Scholar 

  12. W. Ouchi: “Markets, bureaucracies and clans”, Administrative Science Quarterly, XXV, 1980, pp. 129–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Webber: “What’s so new about the new economy?”, Harvard Business Review, January–February, 1993, pp. 4–12.

    Google Scholar 

  14. See G. Hamel & C. K. Prahalad: Competing for the Future, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Klein & P. Hiscocks: “Competence development: a practical toolkit” in G. Hamel and A. Heene (eds): Competence-based Competition, Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. Eccles: “The performance measurement manifesto”, Harvard Business Review, January–February, 1991, pp. 131–7.

    Google Scholar 

  17. See for example C. Fornell: “A national customer satisfaction barometer: the Swedish experience”, Journal of Marketing, 1992, pp. 6–21.

    Google Scholar 

  18. R. Kaplan & D. Norton: “The Balanced Scorecard — Measures That Drive Performance”, Harvard Business Review, January–February 1992, pp. 71–9.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. Kurtzman: “Is your company off course? Now you can find out why”, Fortune, 17 February 1997, pp. 58–60.

    Google Scholar 

  20. R. Kaplan & D. Norton: The Balanced Scorecard, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  21. L. Edvinsson & M. Malone: Intellectual Capital: Realizing Your Company’s True Value by Finding Its Hidden Brainpower, Harper Business, New York, NY, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  22. For more information, see H. Itami with T. Roehl: Mobilizing Invisible Assets, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  23. For more information, see G. Hamel & A. Heene (eds): Competence-based Competition, Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  24. For more information, see P. Senge: The Fifth Discipline, Doubleday Currency, New York, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1997 Johan Roos, Göran Roos, Nicola Carlo Dragonetti and Leif Edvinsson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Roos, J., Roos, G., Dragonetti, N.C., Edvinsson, L. (1997). The New Business World. In: Intellectual Capital. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14494-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics