Abstract
Businesses worldwide operate within systems of laws in setting prices for products and services. These legal frameworks, made up of laws, court decisions, and administrative regulations, are focused on preserving competition and preventing restraints of trade, as well as regulating competitive actions that may result in unfairness and deception on the part of the seller. In England, for example, the common-law rule is that all interference with individual liberty in trading and all restraints in and of themselves are contrary to public opinion and therefore void unless justified by special circumstances. From the passage of the original statutes such as the Sherman Antitrust Act in the USA a century ago the scope and interpretation of these legal frameworks have been expanded and redefined to include much of what businesses view today as the essence of competition. It should come as no surprise that much of the legal attention has been and continues to be on pricing, the setting of prices, and the uses of prices in competitive actions. For example, the practice of price fixing is prohibited outright by Sweden’s Competition Act 1982. In the United Kingdom, the Restrictive Trade Practices Acts 1976 and 1977 make compulsory the registration of agreements between two or more manufacturers or suppliers doing business that impose any restriction on two or more parties to the agreement as to prices.
I would be the first to allow there is no such thing as a perfect market. But nobody is claiming that our mixed economy is anywhere near perfection. Nobody is claiming there’s no room for government to enhance and sometimes supplement the workings of a free market. I would be the first to point out that government has an important role in our economy. Moreover, it may appropriately serve as a catalyst to promote the overall competitiveness of our basic industries and even help specific industries where clear spillover effects exist.
(James C. Miller III, Chairman, Federal Trade Commission, in a speech to the Section of Anti-Trust Law, American Bar Association, Washington, DC, 22 March 1984)
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
‘The Uruguay Round’s Key Results’, Wall Street Journal, 15 December 1993, p. A6.
United Brands Co. v. E.C. Commission (1978).
Hoffman-LaRoche & Co. AG v. E.C. Commission (1979).
Europemballage Corp. and Continental Can Co., Inc. v. E.C. Commission (1973).
Emil Friberg and Cecil Thomas ‘Is Antitrust Obsolete?’ Journal of Economic Issues, vol. XXV (June 1991) pp. 617–624.
Lino A. Graglia ‘One Hundred Years of Antitrust’, Public Interest, Summer 1991, pp. 50–66.
William E. Kovacic The Identification and Proof of Horizontal Agreements Under Antitrust Laws’, The Antitrust Bulletin, Spring 1993, Lc. 5–81.
Law Against Restraint of Competition (Gesetz Wettbewerbsbeschrankungen) 20 February. 1990.
Mid-Atlantic Toyota Antitrust Litigation, D.MD. (April 1983).
‘Antitrust: The FTC Redefines Price-fixing’, Business Week, vol. 19 (April 1983) p. 38.
Matsushita Electrical Industrial Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp. 475U.S. 574 (1986).
Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp., 104 (S.Ct., March 1984).
Resale Price Maintenance: Economic Evidence from Litigation, FTC Bureau of? Economic Report, April 1988.
Metrix Warehouse, Inc. v. Daimler-Benz Aktiengesellschaft et al. (D.C. MD, December 1983).
Eximco, Inc., John D. Spears, Joseph D. Michelli, and Rufus I. Davis v. The Trane Co. and Shepard Sales and Services, Inc. (CA-5, July 1984).
Falls City Industries v. Vanco Beverages, Inc., 103 (S.Ct., February 1983).
A.A. Poultry Farms, Inc. v. Rose Acre Farms, Inc. 881 F. 2d 1396 (7th Cir. 1989), Cert Denied, 110 S. Ct. 1326 (1990).
Phillip Areeda and Donald F. Turner ‘Predatory Pricing and Related Practices Under Section 2 of the Sherman Act’, Harvard Law Review, vol. 88 (1975) pp. 711–722.
Clarie Taylor-Sherman ‘A Unified Approach to Predatory Pricing Analysis Under the Sherman and Robinson-Patman Acts: A.A. Poultry Farms, Inc. v. Rose Acre Farms, Inc., A Case Against the Tide’, Minnesota Law Review, vol. 76, pp. 1283–1312.22.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1995 Nessim Hanna and H. Robert Dodge
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hanna, N., Dodge, H.R. (1995). Pricing and the Legal Issues. In: Pricing. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14477-8_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14477-8_12
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-69413-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-14477-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)