Skip to main content

‘With a Little Help From Our Friends’: Public-Private Partnerships as Institutions and Instruments

  • Chapter
Partnerships in Urban Governance

Abstract

Partnership has become a more common term in the analysis of public policy, and especially in areas such as economic development, technology transfer and urban management (Kernaghan 1993). As both the public and private sectors find their resources constrained and both their demands and opportunities growing, they have found themselves increasingly interdependent. They also find it useful to leverage one another and to develop partnership arrangements with actors in the other sector. Increasingly, neither the public nor the private sector appears capable of performing well without the involvement of the other. As we will point out below, there are a variety of definitional problems involved in the use of the term ‘partnership’. Those conceptual problems, however, certainly have not prevented actors in the real world from engaging in a variety of arrangements that they are quite sure constitute partnerships under any reasonable definition of that term.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ashford, D. E. (1986), The Emergence of Welfare States (Oxford: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R. M. (1984), The Evolution of Cooperation (New York: Basic Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Calista, D. (1989), ‘A Transaction Cost Analysis of Implementation’, pp. 127–44 in D. Palumbo and D. Calista (eds), Implementation Theory (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. (1975), ‘Equal Treatment and Unequal Benefits’, Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 42: 449–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J. and W. W. Powell (1991), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (1961), A Comparative Analysis of Complex Organizations (New York: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S. and H. Weck (1983), ‘Estimating Tax Evasion: A “Naive Approach”’, Oxford Economic Papers 35: 23–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafstein, R. (1991), Institutional Realism: Social and Political Constraints on Rational Actors (New Haven: Yale University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1985), ‘Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embededness’, American Journal of Sociology 91: 481–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkesworth, M. (1988), Theoretical Issues in Policy Analysis (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisler, M. O. (1974), ‘The European Polity Model’, pp. 27–89 in M. O. Heisler (ed.), Politics in Europe (New York: David McKay).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C. (1986), The Tools of Government (Chatham, NJ: Chatham House).

    Google Scholar 

  • Immergut, E. (1992), Health Politics: Interests and Institutions in Western Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • In t’ Veld, R. J. (1991), Autopoeisis and Configuration Theory (Dordrecht: Kluwer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C.O. (1984), An Introduction to the Study of Public Policy, 2nd edn (Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R. O., J. S. Nye and S. Hoffman (1993), After the Cold War (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernaghan, K. (1993), ‘Partnerships and Public Administration: Conceptual and Practical Considerations’, Canadian Public Administration 36: 57–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschen, E. (1964), Economic Policy in Our Time (Amsterdam: North-Holland).

    Google Scholar 

  • Linder, S. H. and B. G. Peters (1989), ‘Instruments of Government: Perceptions and Contexts’, Journal of Public Policy 9: 35–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Listhaug, O. and A. H. Miller (1985), ‘Public Support for Tax Evasion: Self-interest or Symbolic Politics’, European Journal of Political Research 13: 265–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowi, T. J. (1979), The End of Liberalism, 2nd edn (New York: Norton).

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1990), Essays on Self-Reference (New York: Columbia University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. and J. P. Olsen (1984), ‘The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life’, American Political Science Review 78: 734–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. and J. P. Olsen (1989), Rediscovering Institutions (New York: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moe, T. (1984), ‘The New Economics of Organizations’, American Journal of Political Science 28: 739–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1986), ‘An Agenda for the Study of Institutions’, Public Choice 48: 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1991), ‘Rational Choice Theory and Institutional Analysis: Towards Complementarity’, American Political Science Review 85: 237–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. G. (1991), The Politics of Taxation (Oxford: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. G. (1992), ‘The Policy Process: An Institutionalist Perspective’, Canadian Public Administration 35: 160–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. G. (1995), American Public Policy: Problems and Promises, 4th edn (Chatham, NJ: Chatham House).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. G. (1996), ‘Political Institutions, Old and New’, in R. E. Goodin and H.-D. Klingemann (eds), A New Handbook of Political Science (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 205–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. G. and S. Loughlin (1995),’ state Traditions and Administrative Reform’, unpublished paper, Department of Political Science, University of Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phidd, R. W. and G. B. Doern (1976), The Politics and Management of Canadian Economic Policy (Toronto: Macmillan of Canada).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierre, J. (1994), Den lokala staten [The Local State] (Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressman, J. L. and A. Wildavsky (1976), Implementation (Berkeley: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. A. W. and D. Marsh (1992), ‘New Directions in the Study of Policy Networks’, European Journal of Political Research 21: 181–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rochefort, D. A. and R. W. Cobb (1994), The Politics of Problem Definition: Shaping the Public Agenda (Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokkan, S. (1966), ‘Norway: Numerical Democracy and Corporate Pluralism’, pp. 70–115 in R. A. Dahl (ed.), Political Opposition in Western Democracies (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F. W. (1989), ‘The Joint Decision Trap: Lessons from German Federalism and European Integration’, Public Administration 66: 239–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepsle, K. A. (1989) ‘Studying Institutions: Some Lessons from the Rational Choice Approach’, Journal of Theoretical Politics 1: 131–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinmo, S., K. Thelen and F. Longstreth (1992), Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, C. L. (1987), ‘The Social Security Bureaucracy in Triumph and Crisis’, pp. 218–36 in L. Galambos (ed.), The New American State (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildavsky, A. (1984), The New Politics of the Budgetary Process (Boston: Little, Brown).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. (1985), The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (New York: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodside, K. (1986), ‘Policy Instruments and the Study of Public Policy’, Canadian Journal of Political Science 19: 775–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1998 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Peters, B.G. (1998). ‘With a Little Help From Our Friends’: Public-Private Partnerships as Institutions and Instruments. In: Pierre, J. (eds) Partnerships in Urban Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14408-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics