Advertisement

Welfare II: Poverty and Income Maintenance

  • Paul Marshall
Chapter
Part of the Macmillan Texts in Economics book series (TE)

Abstract

While the discussion of distribution and inequality in Chapter 15 referred mainly to a summary index, the Gini coefficient, important occasional use was made of the comparison between extremes in the distribution. We turn now in more detail to this question of extremes as we consider poverty as a manifestation of inequality. However, while ‘poverty’ is indeed a reflection of ‘inequality’, the two concepts are quite separate and have different meanings. It is a tautology to state that where incomes are unequally distributed, the poorest members of the population will be found at the bottom of the distribution. It may anyway be the case that these poor individuals are rich indeed when compared with those in the bottom percentile (or even the top percentile) of the income distribution in some other population. In other words, we might judge, say, the bottom 20 per cent of any population to be ‘poor’, but this may be true in only a relative sense, rather than an absolute one.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Abel-Smith, B. and P. Townsend (1965) The Poor and the Poorest (London: Bell & Sons).Google Scholar
  2. Atkinson, A. (1972) Unequal Shares (London: Penguin).Google Scholar
  3. Berthoud, R. (1985) ‘Mr Fowler’s Examination’, Catalyst (Autumn).Google Scholar
  4. Bradshaw, J. (1991) ‘Social Security Expenditure in the 1990s’, Public Money and Management (Winter).Google Scholar
  5. Cmd 6404 (1942) Social Insurance and Allied Services (The Beveridge Report) (London: HMSO).Google Scholar
  6. Cmd 6527 (1944) Employment Policy (London: HMSO).Google Scholar
  7. Commission on Social Justice, the Report of 1996, Social Justice: Strategies for National Renewal (London: Vintage).Google Scholar
  8. Diamond Commission (1975) Report No.1. Cmnd 6171 (London: HMSO).Google Scholar
  9. Diamond Commission (1976) Report No.4. Cmnd 6626 (London: HMSO).Google Scholar
  10. Dilnot, A., J. Kay and C. Morris (1984) The Reform of Social Security (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
  11. Dilnot, A. and S. Webb (1988) ‘The 1988 Social Security Reforms’, Fiscal Studies (August).Google Scholar
  12. Donnison, D. (1991) ‘Squeezed and Broken on the Brink’, The Times Higher Education Supplement, 19 April, p. 13.Google Scholar
  13. EC (1991) Final Report on the Second European Poverty Programme (Brussels: Commission of the European Communities).Google Scholar
  14. Fiegehen, G., P. Lansley and A. Smith (1977) Poverty and Progress in Britain, 1953–73 (Cambridge: CUP).Google Scholar
  15. Fry, V. and G. Stark (1986) ‘The Take-Up of Supplementary Benefit: Gaps in the ‘Safety Net’?’, Fiscal Studies (November).Google Scholar
  16. Giles, C. and S. Webb (1993) ‘A Guide to Poverty Statistics’, Fiscal Studies, 14 (2) pp. 74–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goodman, A. and S. Webb (1994) ‘For Richer, For Poorer: the Changing Distribution of Income in the UK, 1961–91’, Fiscal Studies, 15 (4).Google Scholar
  18. Hemming, R. (1984) Poverty and Incentives (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  19. Jenkins, S. (1991) ‘Living Standards and the Diverging ‘Thatcher’ Effect’, The Guardian (15 April) p. 13.Google Scholar
  20. Jenkins, S. and F. Cowell (1994) ‘Dwarfs and Giants in the 1980s: Trends in the UK Income Distribution’, Fiscal Studies, 15 (1).Google Scholar
  21. Johnson, P. and S. Webb (1990) UK Poverty Statistics: A Comparative Study (London: Institute for Fiscal Studies).Google Scholar
  22. Morris, N. and I. Preston (1986) ‘Taxes, Benefits and the Distribution of Income 1968–83’, Fiscal Studies (November).Google Scholar
  23. Nicholson, R. (1967) ‘The Distribution of Personal Income’, Lloyds Bank Review (January).Google Scholar
  24. Nolan, B. (1989) ‘An Evaluation of the New Official Low Income Statistics, Fiscal Studies, 10 (4).Google Scholar
  25. Oppenheim, C. and Harker, L. (1996) Poverty: the Facts (London: Child Poverty Action Group).Google Scholar
  26. Parker, H. (1995) Taxes, Benefits and Family Life: The Seven Deadly Traps (London: IEA).Google Scholar
  27. Pryke, R. (1995) Taking the Measure of Poverty (London: IEA).Google Scholar
  28. Ramprakash, D. (1994) ‘Poverty in the Countries of the European Union: A Synthesis of Eurostat’s Research in Poverty’, Journal of European Social Policy, 4 (2) pp. 117–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Social Security Select Committee (1991) Low Income Statistics: Households Below Average Income Tables 1988. First Report 1990–91, House of Commons.Google Scholar
  30. The Economist (1996) ‘The Poor: Consumers Like the Rest of Us’ (24 February) pp. 30–1.Google Scholar
  31. Townsend, P. (1991) The Poor are Poorer: A Statistical Report on Changes in the Living Standards of Rich and Poor in the United Kingdom 1979–1989 (Statistical Monitoring Unit, University of Bristol).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Paul Marshall 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Marshall

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations