Abstract
This study has sought to achieve three principal goals. First, it has traced the development of a European security and defense identity over the period 1979–92. Second, it has offered an analysis of the internal and external factors which influenced this development. Third, it has sought to explain the limited security mandate of the European Community concluded to date.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See Timothy Garton Ash, ‘Germany’s Choice’, Foreign Affairs 73, no. 3 (1994).
The neorealist school is becoming increasingly divided over its views on institutions, change, and the future of European security. Some neorealists now stress the potential of institutions for mediating the security dilemma. (Barry Buzan, Morten Kielstrup, Pierre Lemaitre, Elizabieta Tromer, and Ole Wæver, The European Security Order Recast: Scenarios for the Post-Cold War Era [London: Pinter, 1990]). More doctrinaire neorealists such as John Mearsheimer continue to ridicule institutions and predict an apocryphal return to West European wars.
See Stephen Van Evera, ‘Primed for Peace: Europe After the Cold War’, International Security 15, no. 3. (Winter 1990/91): 33–40.
See inter alia Bruce Russett and Thomas Risse-Kappen, ‘Correspondence’, ibid., 216–19.
Copyright information
© 1997 Andrew Wyatt-Walter
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wyatt-Walter, H. (1997). Conclusion: The EC and Security — Continuity Within a Changing Relationship. In: The European Community and the Security Dilemma, 1979–92. St Antony’s Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14245-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14245-3_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-14247-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-14245-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)