Abstract
The UK has had a policy of encouraging inward investors since at least 1979, and has been successful in attracting a large proportion of all foreign direct investment (FDI) into the EU (IBB, 1993). The theory of FDI points to many reasons why countries would wish to attract inward investment, going well beyond direct employment effects. Theory assumes that, in general, in order to prosper in a foreign environment the firm must possess some ‘ownership’ advantage. Vernon (1966), for example, attributed this to superior or new products, while Dunning (1979) asserted that to be able to locate profitably outside its home country a company must have some firm-specific advantage of the type described in his eclectic theory (Dunning, 1988a). The general explanation concerning ownership advantages has recently been characterised more specifically, for example in terms of technological advantage (Cantwell, 1987). This is an important distinction. If ownership advantages are in terms of technological superiority, then this can be measured using factor productivity. Indeed Davies and Lyons (1991) measure this productivity gap and conclude that the foreign-owned sector has an advantage of some 40 per cent over the domestic sector.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Cantwell, J. A. (1987) ‘The Reorganisation of European Firms after Integration’, Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 26, pp. 127–51.
Cantwell, J. A. (1991) ‘The International Agglomeration of R&D’, in M. C. Casson (ed.), Global Research Strategy and International Competitiveness, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Cowling, K. and R. Sugden (1987) Transnational Monopoly Capitalism, London: Wheatsheaf.
Davies, S. W. and B. R. Lyons (1991) ‘Characterising Relative Performance: The productivity advantage of foreign owned firms in the UK’, University of East Anglia Economics Research Centre Discussion Paper no. 9106.
Driffield, N. L. (1991) ‘A Plant Level Comparison of the Wages Paid by Foreign and Domestic Firms in the UK’, University of Reading Discussion Paper, series, no. 29.
Driffield, N. L. (1993) ‘Some Implications for UK Manufacturing of the Labour Market Policies Employed by Foreign Multinationals in the UK’, Cardiff Business School Discussion Papers in Economics.
Driffield, N. L. (1995) ‘The Indirect Employment Effects of Foreign Direct Investment into the UK’, Cardiff Business School Discussion Paper in Economics.
Driffield, N. L. (1996) Global Competition and the labour market, Reading: Harwood.
Driffield, N. L. and S. Hill (1995) ‘Regional Impacts of Internationally Mobile Investments in the UK’, Cardiff Business School Discussion Papers in Economics.
Dunning, J. H. (1979) ‘Explaining Patterns of International Production: In Defence of the Eclectic Theory’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, vol. 41, no. 4 (November), pp. 269–95.
Dunning, J. H. (1988a) ‘The Eclectic Paradigm of International Production: A Restatement of some possible Extensions’, Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1–29.
Dunning, J. H. (1988b) Multinationals, Technology and Competitiveness, London: Allen & Unwin.
Enderwich, P. (1989) ‘Multinational, Corporate Restructuring and International Competitions’, California Management Review, vol. 32, pp. 44–58.
Hill, S. and M. Munday (1992) ‘The UK Regional Distribution of Inward Investment: Analysis and Determinants’, Regional Studies, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 535–4.
Hymer, S. H. (1972) ‘The Multinational Corporation and the Law of Uneven Development’, in J. N. Bhagwati (ed.), Economics and World Order (New York: World Law Fund).
Invest in Britain Bureau (IBB) (1993) Annual Report, London: Department of Trade and Industry.
Kreye, O., Heinrichs, J. and Forbel, F. (1988), Multinational Enterprise and Employment, ILO Multinational Enterprise Programme, Working Paper 55.
Peck, F. (1990) ‘Nissan in the North East: The Multiplier Effects’, Geography, vol. 75, pp. 354–57.
Vernon, R. (1966) ‘International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 80, pp. 190–207.
Young, S., N. Hood and J. Hamill (1988) Foreign Multinationals and the UK Economy, London: Croom Helm.
Young, S., N. Hood and E. Peters (1994) ‘Multinational Enterprises and Regional Economic Development’, Regional Studies, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 657–77.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1998 Nigel Driffield
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Driffield, N. (1998). The Indirect Regional Impact of Inward Investment. In: Hill, S., Morgan, B. (eds) Inward Investment, Business Finance and Regional Development. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14181-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14181-4_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-14183-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-14181-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)