Skip to main content
  • 25 Accesses

Abstract

The UK has had a policy of encouraging inward investors since at least 1979, and has been successful in attracting a large proportion of all foreign direct investment (FDI) into the EU (IBB, 1993). The theory of FDI points to many reasons why countries would wish to attract inward investment, going well beyond direct employment effects. Theory assumes that, in general, in order to prosper in a foreign environment the firm must possess some ‘ownership’ advantage. Vernon (1966), for example, attributed this to superior or new products, while Dunning (1979) asserted that to be able to locate profitably outside its home country a company must have some firm-specific advantage of the type described in his eclectic theory (Dunning, 1988a). The general explanation concerning ownership advantages has recently been characterised more specifically, for example in terms of technological advantage (Cantwell, 1987). This is an important distinction. If ownership advantages are in terms of technological superiority, then this can be measured using factor productivity. Indeed Davies and Lyons (1991) measure this productivity gap and conclude that the foreign-owned sector has an advantage of some 40 per cent over the domestic sector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Cantwell, J. A. (1987) ‘The Reorganisation of European Firms after Integration’, Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 26, pp. 127–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, J. A. (1991) ‘The International Agglomeration of R&D’, in M. C. Casson (ed.), Global Research Strategy and International Competitiveness, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowling, K. and R. Sugden (1987) Transnational Monopoly Capitalism, London: Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, S. W. and B. R. Lyons (1991) ‘Characterising Relative Performance: The productivity advantage of foreign owned firms in the UK’, University of East Anglia Economics Research Centre Discussion Paper no. 9106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driffield, N. L. (1991) ‘A Plant Level Comparison of the Wages Paid by Foreign and Domestic Firms in the UK’, University of Reading Discussion Paper, series, no. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driffield, N. L. (1993) ‘Some Implications for UK Manufacturing of the Labour Market Policies Employed by Foreign Multinationals in the UK’, Cardiff Business School Discussion Papers in Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driffield, N. L. (1995) ‘The Indirect Employment Effects of Foreign Direct Investment into the UK’, Cardiff Business School Discussion Paper in Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driffield, N. L. (1996) Global Competition and the labour market, Reading: Harwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driffield, N. L. and S. Hill (1995) ‘Regional Impacts of Internationally Mobile Investments in the UK’, Cardiff Business School Discussion Papers in Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. (1979) ‘Explaining Patterns of International Production: In Defence of the Eclectic Theory’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, vol. 41, no. 4 (November), pp. 269–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. (1988a) ‘The Eclectic Paradigm of International Production: A Restatement of some possible Extensions’, Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. (1988b) Multinationals, Technology and Competitiveness, London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enderwich, P. (1989) ‘Multinational, Corporate Restructuring and International Competitions’, California Management Review, vol. 32, pp. 44–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, S. and M. Munday (1992) ‘The UK Regional Distribution of Inward Investment: Analysis and Determinants’, Regional Studies, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 535–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hymer, S. H. (1972) ‘The Multinational Corporation and the Law of Uneven Development’, in J. N. Bhagwati (ed.), Economics and World Order (New York: World Law Fund).

    Google Scholar 

  • Invest in Britain Bureau (IBB) (1993) Annual Report, London: Department of Trade and Industry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreye, O., Heinrichs, J. and Forbel, F. (1988), Multinational Enterprise and Employment, ILO Multinational Enterprise Programme, Working Paper 55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck, F. (1990) ‘Nissan in the North East: The Multiplier Effects’, Geography, vol. 75, pp. 354–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, R. (1966) ‘International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 80, pp. 190–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, S., N. Hood and J. Hamill (1988) Foreign Multinationals and the UK Economy, London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, S., N. Hood and E. Peters (1994) ‘Multinational Enterprises and Regional Economic Development’, Regional Studies, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 657–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1998 Nigel Driffield

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Driffield, N. (1998). The Indirect Regional Impact of Inward Investment. In: Hill, S., Morgan, B. (eds) Inward Investment, Business Finance and Regional Development. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14181-4_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics