Advertisement

The Entry Mode Decisions of Multinational Enterprises and Regional Economic Development

  • David A. Williams
  • David J. Smith

Abstract

Attitudes towards foreign direct investment (FDI), especially at the regional level, tend to be strongly polarised between those who perceive it as an aid to regional development, and thus something to be encouraged, and those who regard it as a process that will retard economic growth and displace indigenous industry (Collis and Noon, 1994).

Keywords

Foreign Direct Investment Foreign Market Entry Mode Multinational Enterprise Parent Firm 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ashcroft, B. and J. H. Love (1993) Take-overs, Mergers and the Regional Economy, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Behrman, J. (1972) The Role of International Companies in Latin America: Autos and Petrochemicals, Lexington: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  3. Biersteker, T. J. (1981) Distortion or Development? Contending Perspectives on the Multinational Corporation, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Collis, C. and D. Noon (1994) ‘Foreign Direct Investment in the UK Regions: Recent Trends and Policy Issues’, Regional Studies, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 843–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Collis, C. and P. Roberts (1992) ‘FDI and the West Midlands Economy: A Brief Historical Context’, Local Economy, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 114–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Del Monte, A. and R. De Luzenberger (1989) ‘The Effect of Regional Policy on New Firm Formation in Southern Italy’, Regional Studies, vol. 23, pp. 219–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dicken, P. (1992) Global Shift: The Internationalization of Economic Activity, London: Paul Chapman.Google Scholar
  8. Dunning, J. H. (1993) Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy, Wokingham: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  9. Garrahan, P. and P. Stewart (1992) The Nissan Enigma: Flexibility at Work in a Local Economy, London: Mansell.Google Scholar
  10. Glickman, N. F. and D. P. Woodward (1989) The New Competitors: How Investors are Changing the US Economy, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  11. Goodnow, J. D. (1985) ‘Developments in International Mode of Entry Analysis’, International Marketing Review, Autumn, pp. 17–30.Google Scholar
  12. Graham, M. and P. Krugman (1989) Foreign Direct Investment in the United States, Washington Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
  13. Hakansson, P., H. Kjellberg and A. Lundgren (1993) ‘Strategic Alliances in Global Biotechnology: A Network Approach’, International Business Review, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hood, N. and T. Truijens (1993) ‘European Locational Decisions of Japanese Manufacturers: Survey Evidence on the Case of the UK’, International Business Review, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 39–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hood, N. and S. Young (1976) ‘US Investment in Scotland — Aspects of the Branch Factory Syndrome’, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, vol. XXIII, no. 3 (November).Google Scholar
  16. Hood, N. and S. Young (1979) The Economics of the Multinational Enterprise London: Longman.Google Scholar
  17. KMPG Peat Marwick (1992) The 1992 Survey of Foreign-Owned Companies in the West Midlands, West Midlands Development Agency.Google Scholar
  18. Lorange, P. and J. Roos (1993) Strategic Alliances: Formation, Implementation and Evolution, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  19. Morgan, B. (1995) ‘Regional Issues and Endogenous Growth’, paper presented at the 26th Annual Conference of the Regional Science Association International, British and Irish Section, Cardiff, University of Wales College of Cardiff, 13–15 September.Google Scholar
  20. Munday, M., J. Morris and B. Wilkinson (1995) ‘Factories or Warehouses? A Welsh Perspective on Japanese Transplant Manufacturing’, Regional Studies, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ohmae, K. (1990) The Borderless World: Power and Strategy in the Global Marketplace, London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  22. Oliver, N., J. Morris and B. Wilkinson (1992) ‘The Impact of Japanese Manufacturing Investment on European Industry’, in S. Young and J. Hammill (eds), Europe and the Multinationals: Issues and Responses for the 1990s, Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  23. Porter, M. E. (1986) Competition in Global Industries: A Conceptual Framework on Competition in Global Industries, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  24. Root, F. R. (1987) Entry Strategies for International Markets, Lexington: D. C. Heath.Google Scholar
  25. Segal, N. S. and R. E. Quince (1985) ‘The Cambridge Phenomenon and the Role of the Cambridge Science Park’, in J. M. Gibb (ed.), Science Parks and Innovation Centres: Their Economic and Social Impact, Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  26. Turok, I. (1993) ‘Inward Investment and Local Linkages: How Deeply Embedded is “Silicon Glen”?’, Regional Studies, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 401–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. UNCTC (1993) World Investment Report, New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  28. White, R. E. and T. A. Poynter (1984) ‘Strategies for Foreign-Owned Subsidiaries in Canada’, Business Quarterly, Summer, pp. 59–69.Google Scholar
  29. Young, S., N. Hood and S. Dunlop (1986) ‘Global Strategies, Multinational Subsidiary Roles and Economic Impact in Scotland’, Regional Studies, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 487–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Young, S., N. Hood and E. Peters (1994) ‘Multinational Enterprises and Regional Economic Development’, Regional Studies, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 657–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© David A. Williams and David J. Smith 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • David A. Williams
  • David J. Smith

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations