Abstract
This chapter introduces the work of the European Union, focusing on the ability of the institutions to make binding legal acts, and the processes whereby such acts are adopted, on raising and spending of revenue, and on the key mechanisms which have evolved to make these activities more effective and to extend the role of the EU in the economic, social and political spheres. Where appropriate the political and economic context of the legal structures of the EU are highlighted. The chapter concludes with a discussion of interinstitutional relationships, examining the vital role of the Court of Justice in this context. Reference is also made, where appropriate, to the role of the 1996 IGC in relation to institutional processes. A good summary of the institutional status quo in mid-1995, coupled with suggestions for changes, is to be found in the Commission’s Report for the Reflection Group, composed of representatives of the Member States, charged with the task of preparing the IGC agenda (Commission, 1995a).
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Further Reading
Barents (1994), ‘The Quality of Community Legislation’, 1 MJ 101
Bieber (1984), ‘The Settlement of Institutional Conflicts on the Basis of Article 4 of the EEC Treaty’, 21 CMLRev. 505.
Bradley (1991), ‘Sense and Sensibility: Parliament v. Council, continued’, 16 ELRev. 245.
Bradley (1992). ‘Comitology and the Law: Through a Glass, Darkly’, 29 CMLRev. 693.
Commission (1995a), Commission Report for the Reflection Group, Luxembourg, OOPEC.
Dashwood (1994b), ‘Community Legislative Procedures in the Era of the Treaty on European Union’, 19 ELRev. 343.
Earnshaw and Judge (1995), ‘Early days: the European Parliament, co-decision and the European Union legislative procedure post-Maastricht’, 2 JEPP 624.
Emiliou (1994), ‘Opening Pandora’s Box: The Legal Basis of Community Measures before the Court of Justice’, 19 ELRev. 488.
Maher (1995), ‘Legislative Review by the EC Commission: Revision without Radicalism’, in Shaw and More (1995).
Mazey and Richardson (1995), ‘Promiscuous Policymaking: the European Policy Style?’, in Rhodes and Mazey (1995).
Monar (1994), ‘Interinstitutional Agreements: The Phenomenon and its New Dynamics After Maastricht’, 31 CMLRev. 693.
Nugent (1995), ‘The leadership capacity of the European Commission’, 2 JEPP 603.
Peters (1994), ‘Agenda-setting in the European Community’, 1 JEPP 9.
Peterson (1995), ‘Decision-making in the European Union: towards a frame-work for analysis’, 2 JEPP 69.
Pinder (1995), Ch. 8, ‘European Budget and Public Finance Union’.
Ress (1994), ‘Democratic Decision-Making in the European Union and the Role of the European Parliament’ in Curtin and Heukels (1994).
Ungerer (1993), ‘Institutional Consequences of Broaderning and Deepening the Community: the Consequences for the Decision-making process’, 30 CMLRev. 71.
Weiler (1989), ‘Pride and Prejudice — Parliament v. Council’, 14 ELRev. 334.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1996 Jo Shaw
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shaw, J. (1996). The European Union and its Institutions at Work. In: Law of the European Union. Macmillan Law Masters. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14127-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14127-2_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-66481-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-14127-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)