Skip to main content
  • 34 Accesses

Abstract

This is a study of religious-cultural, economic, and political anti-Semitism among high schoolers in the Netherlands and Belgium (Flanders). It also relates anti-Semitism to students’ knowledge about World War II, their socioeconomic status, and other personal indicators (for example, having Jews as acquaintances).

The research findings indicate that anti-Semitism was divisible into three parts, that students largely rejected it, and that authoritarianism was linked to and shared common roots with it. The more knowledge students had about the Holocaust and the more they paid attention to details of World War II, the less anti-Semitism they demonstrated. Therefore, knowledge is both directly related to anti-Semitism and indirectly related to it through students’ attitudes toward World War II. The other factors measured (SES and acquaintances) were not so closely associated, but authoritarianism was found to be an intermediary factor.

In Belgium (Flanders), anti-Semitism was related to antiminority prejudices, nationalism, xenophobia, authoritarianism, antifeminism, pro-apartheid, and racist party preference. Type of education or school was also related to anti-Semitism and ethnocentrism so that education played a role here as a mediating factor. The conclusion is that, while anti-Semitism may not always be part of the authoritarianism-ethnocentrism syndrome, it often appears that a rise in such attitudes may increase anti-Semitism and vice versa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adorno, T., E. Frenkel-Brunswik, D. Levinson, and R. Sanford (1950). The Authoritarian Personality. New York, NY: Harper and Row. Abridged edition with a new introduction by N. Sanford and D. Levinson (1982). New York, NY: Norton and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altemeyer, B. (1988). Enemies of Freedom. London, UK: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, R. and M. Jahoda (1954). Studies in the Scope and Method of ‘The Authoritarian Personality’: Continuities in Social Research. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisinga, R. and P. Scheepers (1989). Etnocentrisme in Nederland (Ethnocentrism in The Netherlands). Nijmegen, the Netherlands: ITS.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Grift, W., W. de Vos, and J. Meloen (1991). Anti-Semitisme en autoritarisme onder scholieren (Anti-Semitism and Authoritarianism among secondary school pupils). Utrecht, the Netherlands: Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht and Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Anne Frank Stichting, Academisch Boekencentrum De Lier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagendoorn, A. and J. Janssen (1983). Rechtsomkeer (Turn Right!). Baarn, the Netherlands: Ambo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederer, G. (1983). Jugend und Autorität: Ueber den Einstellungswandel zum Autoritarismus in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland und den USA (Youth and Authority: Regarding Changes in the Authoritarian Mentality in the FRG and the USA). Opladen, FRG: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meloen, J. (1983). De autoritaire reaktie in tijden van welvaart en krisis (The Authoritarian Response in Times of Prosperity and Crisis). Dissertation. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: University of Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meloen, J. (1991). ‘The Fortieth Anniversary of “The Authoritarian Personality”: Is There New Evidence to Consider the Authoritarian Personality to Be the Backbone of “Left” as Well as “Right Wing” Dictatorships?’, pp. 119–27 in Politics and the Individual, Vol. 1, No. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meloen, J. (1993). ‘The F Scale as a Predictor of Fascism: An Overview of 40 Years of Authoritarianism Research’, pp. 47–69 in W. Stone, G. Lederer, and R. Christie (1993) Strength and Weakness: The Authoritarian Personality Today. New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Meloen, J., G. van der Linden, and H. de Witte (1994). ‘Authoritarianism and Political Racism in Belgian Randers: A Test of the Approaches of Adorno et al., Lederer and Altemeyer’, pp. 72–108 in R. Holly (ed.) Political Consciousness and Civic Education during the Transformation of the System. Warsaw, Poland: Institute of Political Studies, Polish Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meloen, J. and C. Middendorp (1991). ‘Authoritarianism in the Netherlands: Ideology, Personality, or Sub-Culture’, pp. 49–72 in Politics and the Individual, Vol. 1, No. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middendorp, C. (1978). Progressiveness and Conservatism: The Fundamental Dimensions of Ideology Controversy and their Relationship to Social Class. The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raaijmakers, Q., W. Meeus, and W. Vollebergh (1986). ‘Extreme Politieke Opvattingen bij LBO en MAVO-scholieren’ (Extreme Political Opinions Among High School Students). Paper presented to Dutch Conference on Political Psychology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinecke, J. (1989). ‘Interviewereffekte und Soziale Erwünschtheit: Theorie, Modell, und Empirische Ergebnisse’ (Interview Effect and Social Desirability: Theory, Model, and Empirical Results). Münster, FRG: Institut für Soziologic und Sozialpädagogik, Universität Münster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roc, R. (1975). Links en Rechts in Empirisch Perspectief (Left and Right-wing in an Empirical Perspective). Dissertation, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silbermann, A. (1982). Sind wir Antisemiten? Ausmass und Wirkung eines sozialen Vorurteils in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Are We Anti-Semitic? Dimensions and Effects of Social Prejudice in Germany.) Köln, FRG: Verlag Wissenschaft und Politik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, M. (1972). ‘Authoritarianism and Education: A Comparative Approach’, pp. 223–34 in Sociometry, Vol. 35, No. 2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1996 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Meloen, J. (1996). Authoritarianism, ‘Nie Wieder’. In: Farnen, R.F., Dekker, H., Meyenberg, R., German, D.B. (eds) Democracy, Socialization and Conflicting Loyalties in East and West. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14059-6_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics