Abstract
An empirical investigation of relevant data for 70 nations sought to find the meaning of authoritarianism and its possible relationships to dictatorial and antidemocratic political regimes. There were four levels of analysis. 1) Cross-national authoritarianism — the first problem investigated asked: Are there any measures of authoritarianism that are predictably different for different countries? If so, why do these differences exist? For this purpose, an estimate of authoritarianism scores was based on the results of 32 countries from which large numbers of authoritarianism data were available from a worldwide review. 2) State authoritarianism — next, a score for state authoritarianism was developed from these global indicators for some 70 selected countries. These included all the major countries on all continents. 3) Relationship between state authoritarianism and authoritarian attitudes — the state authoritarianism score was related to the previously developed estimate of authoritarianism levels in 32 countries. Surprisingly, both were highly correlated. 4) Preliminary analyses regarding causes of state authoritarianism — to understand the possible relationship between authoritarian attitudes and state authoritarianism, models were tested based on results of, and our experience with, 40 years of authoritarianism research. These models included independent global indicators of politics, economics, population (for example, density and urbanization), education, communications, ethnicity, the gender gap, military conflict, family-type, and religion. Conclusion and discussion — these models are presented and the most plausible explanations (in terms of the various guiding theories of authoritarianism) are discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adorno, T., E. Frenkel-Brunswik, D. Levinson, R. Sanford (1950). The Authoritarian Personality. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Albinski, M. (1959). De Onderwijzer en de Cultuuroverdracht (The Teacher and the Transfer of Culture). Assen, the Netherlands: Van Gorcum.
Altemeyer, B. (1988). Enemies of Freedom. London, UK: Jossey Bass.
Altemeyer, B. (1993). Personal communication with the author.
Billig, M. (1985). ‘The Unobservant Participator: Nazism, Anti-Semitism and Ray’s Reply’, pp. 444–9 in Ethnic and Racial Studies, Vol. 8, No. 3.
CIA, Central Intelligence Agency (1993). The World Fact Book 1993–94. New York, NY: Maxwell Macmillan Company.
Freedom House News (1996). ‘Global Gains for Democracy as Threats Loom’, pp. 1–16 in Freedom Review, Vol. 27, No. 1.
Freedom House Survey Team (1993). Freedom in the World: The Annual Survey of Political Rights and Civil Liberties 1992–1993. New York, NY: Freedom House.
Freedom House Survey Team (1995). Freedom in the World: The Annual Survey of Political Rights and Civil Liberties 1994–1995. New York, NY: Freedom House.
Fukuyama, F. (1992). The End of History and the Last Man. London, UK: Penguin Books.
Goldstein, K. and S. Blackman (1978). Cognitive Style. New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.
Kidron, M. and R. Segal (1991). The New State of the World Atlas. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
MacKay, J. (1993). State of Health Atlas. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
Meade, R. and J. Whittaker (1967). ‘A Cross-Cultural Study of Authoritarianism’, pp. 3–7 in Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 72.
Meloen, J. (1983). De Autoritaire Reactie in Tijden van Welvaart en Crisis (The Authoritarian Response in Times of Prosperity and Crisis). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: University of Amsterdam, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation.
Meloen, J. (1991). ‘The Fortieth Anniversary of “The Authoritarian Personality,”’ pp. 119–27 in Politics and the Individual, Vol. 1, No. 1.
Meloen, J. (1993). ‘The F Scale as a Predictor of Fascism: An Overview of 40 Years of Authoritarianism Research’, pp. 47–69 in W. Stone, G. Lederer, and R. Christie (eds.) Strength and Weakness: The Authoritarian Personality Today. New York, NY: Springer Verlag.
Meloen, J., R. Farnen, and D. German (1994). ‘Authoritarianism and Democracy’, pp. 123–52 in G. Csepeli, D. German, L. Kéri, and I. Stumpf (eds.) From Subject to Citizen. Budapest, Hungary: Hungarian Center for Political Education.
Meloen, J. and C. Middendorp (1985). ‘Potentieel Fascisme in Nederland’ (Potential Fascism in the Netherlands), pp. 93–108 in Jaarboek van de Nederlandse Vereniging van Marktonderzoekers. Haarlem, the Netherlands: De Vriegeborgh.
Meloen, J. and C. Middendorp (1991). ‘Authoritarianism in the Netherlands: Ideology, Personality or Sub Culture’, pp. 49–72 in Politics and the Individual, Vol. 1, No. 2.
Middleton, R. (1976). ‘Regional Differences in Prejudice’, pp. 94–117 in American Sociological Review, Vol. 41.
Rokeach, M. (1960). The Open and Closed Mind. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Simpson, M. (1972). ‘Authoritarianism and Education: A Comparative Approach’, pp. 223–34 in Sociometry, Vol. 35, No. 2.
UNDP, United Nations Development Programme (1991). Human Development Report 1991. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
UNESCO, United Nations Education Scientific and Cultural Organization (1991). World Education Report 1991. Paris, France: UNESCO.
Williams, J. (1966). ‘Regional Differences in Authoritarianism’, pp. 273–7 in Social Forces, Vol. 45.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1996 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Meloen, J. (1996). Authoritarianism, Democracy, and Education. In: Farnen, R.F., Dekker, H., Meyenberg, R., German, D.B. (eds) Democracy, Socialization and Conflicting Loyalties in East and West. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14059-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14059-6_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-14061-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-14059-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)