Advertisement

Changing Nationality Stereotypes through Contact

An Experimental Test of the Contact Hypothesis among European Youngsters
  • Hub Linssen
  • Louk Hagendoorn
  • Ludo Mateusen

Abstract

In a European 12-nation study, the contact hypothesis was tested according to an experimental within-subject repeated measurement/between-subjects research treatment design. It was hypothesized that informal, frequent, and cooperative contact between members of different nationalities would reduce their reciprocally held nation-to-nation stereotypes and that this reduction would not be generalized to equivalent nations. The results revealed that 75 per cent of all contact effects were positive and that no generalization to equivalent nations occurred in 75 per cent of the instances where contact had a positive or negative effect. The results are discussed within the framework of self-categorization theory.

Keywords

Intergroup Relation Contact Effect Intergroup Contact Contact Experience Contact Situation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allport, G. (1954). The Nature of Prejudice. Cambridge/Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  2. Amir, Y. (1976). ‘The Role of Intergroup Contact in Change of Prejudice and Ethnic Relations’, pp. 245–308 in P. Katz (ed.) Towards the Elimination of Racism. Elmford, NY: Pergamon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biernat, M. (1990). ‘Stereotypes on Campus: How Contact and Liking Influence Perception of Group Distinctiveness’, pp. 1485–513 in Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 20, No. 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blanchard, F. and S. Cook (1976). ‘Effects of Helping a less Competent Member of a Cooperating Interracial Group on the Development of Interpersonal Attraction’, pp. 1245–55 in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 34, No. 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bornman, E. and J. Mynhardt (1991). ‘Social Identity and Intergroup Contact in South Africa with Specific Reference to the Work Situation’, pp. 437–62 in Genetic and General Psychology Monographs, Vol. 117, No. 4.Google Scholar
  6. Brewer, M. and N. Miller (1984). ‘Beyond the Contact Hypothesis: Theoretical Perspectives on Desegregation’, pp. 281–302 in N. Miller and M. Brewer (eds.) Groups in Contact: the Psychology of Desegregation. New York, NY: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, R. (1984). ‘The Effects of Intergroup Similarity and Cooperative Versus Competitive Orientation on Intergroup Discrimination’, pp. 21–33 in British Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, R. and D. Abrams (1986). ‘The Effect of Intergroup Similarity and Goal Interdependence on Intergroup Attitudes and Task Performance’, pp. 78–92 in Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol. 22.Google Scholar
  9. Caspi, A. (1984). ‘Contact Hypothesis and Inter-Age Attitudes: a Field Study of Cross-Age Contact’, pp. 74–80 in Social Psychology Quarterly, Vol.47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clement, R., R. Gardner, and P. Smythe (1977). ‘Inter-Ethnic Contact: Attitudinal Consequences’, pp. 205–15 in Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, Vol. 9, No. 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Commins, R. and J. Lockwood (1978). ‘The Effects on Intergroup Relations of Mixing Roman Catholics and Protestants: an Experimental Investigation’, pp. 383–6 in European Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cook, S. (1978). ‘Interpersonal and Attitudinal Outcomes in Co-Operating Interracial Groups’, pp. 97–113 in Journal of Research and Development in Education, Vol. 12.Google Scholar
  13. Desforges, D., C. Lord, S. Ramsey, J. Mason, M. Van Leeuwen, S. West, and M. Lepper (1991). ‘Effects of Structured Cooperative Contact on Changing Negative Attitudes Toward Stigmatized Social Groups’, pp. 531–44 in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol 60, No. 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Deschamps, J. and R. Brown (1983). ‘Superordinate Goals and Intergroup Conflict’, pp. 189–95 in British Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Diab, L. (1970). ‘A Study of Intragroup and Intergroup Relations among Experimentally Produced Small Groups’, pp. 49–82 in Genetic Psychology Monographs, Vol. 82.Google Scholar
  16. Gaertner, S., J. Mann, J. Dovidio, A. Murell, and M. Pomare (1990). ‘How Does Cooperation Reduce Intergroup Bias?’, pp. 692–704 in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 59, No. 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hallinan, M. and S. Smith (1985). ‘The Effects of Classroom Racial Composition on Students’ Interracial Friendliness’, pp. 3–16 in Social Psychology Quarterly, Vol. 47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hewstone, M. and R. Brown (1986). ‘Contact Is Not Enough: an Intergroup Perspective on the “Contact Hypothesis”.’ pp. 1–44 in M. Hewstone and R. Brown (eds.) Contact and Conflict in Intergroup Encounters. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  19. Linssen, H. and L. Hagendoorn (1994). ‘Social and Geographical Factors in the Explanation of the Content of European Nationality Stereotypes’, pp. 165–82 in British Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 33, No. 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marin, G. (1984). ‘Stereotyping Hispanics: the Differential Effect of Research Method, Label and Degree of Contact’, pp. 17–27 in International Journal of Intercultural Relations, Vol. 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Miller, N. and G. Davidson-Podgorny (1987). ‘Theoretical Models of Intergroup Relations and the Use of Cooperative Teams as an Intervention for Desegregated Settings’, pp. 31–65 in C. Hendrick (ed.) Group Processes and Intergroup Relations. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  22. Norvell, N. and S. Worchel (1981). ‘A Re-Examination of the Relation Between Equal Status Contact and Intergroups Attraction’, pp. 902–8 in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 41, No. 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Revenson, T. (1989). ‘Compassionate Stereotyping of Elderly Patients by Physicians: Revising the Social Contact Hypothesis’, pp. 230–4 in Psychology and Aging, Vol. 4, No. 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Riordan, C. (1987). ‘Intergroup Contact in Small Cities’, pp. 143–54 in International Journal of Intercultural Relations, Vol. 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rosch, E. (1978). ‘Principles of Categorization’, pp. 27–48 in E. Rosch and B. Loyd (eds.) Cognition and Categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  26. Rosenfield, D., W. Stephan, and G. Lucker (1981). ‘Attraction to Competent and Incompetent Members of Cooperative and Comparative Groups’, pp. 416–33 in Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schofield, J. (1979). ‘The Impact of Positively Structured Contact on Intergroup Behavior Does it Last under Adverse Conditions?’, pp. 280–4 in Social Psychology Quarterly, Vol. 42, No. 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Spangenberg, J. and E. Nel (1985). ‘The Effect of Equal-Status on Ethnic Attitudes’, pp. 173–80 in The Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stephan, W. (1987). ‘The Contact Hypothesis in Intergroup Relations’, pp. 13–40 in C. Hendrick (ed.) Group Processes and Intergroup Relations. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  30. Stevens, J. (1992). Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  31. Tajfel, H. (ed.) (1978). Differentiation Between Social Groups. London, UK: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  32. Turner, J. (1987). ‘A Self-Categorization Theory’, pp. 42–67 in J. Turner (ed.) Rediscovering the Social Group: a Self-Categorization Theory. London, UK: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  33. Wagner, U., M. Hewstone, and U. Machleit (1989). ‘Contact and Prejudice Between Germans and Turks: a Correlational Study’, pp. 561–74 in Human Relations, Vol. 42, No. 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wilder, D. and P. Shapiro (1989). ‘Role of Competition-Induced Anxiety in Limiting the Beneficial Impact of Positive Behavior by an Outgroup Member’, pp. 60–9 in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wilder, D. and J. Thompson (1980). ‘Intergroup Contact with Independent Manipulations of Ingroup and Outgroup Interaction’, pp. 589–603 in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 38, No. 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Williams, R. (1964). Strangers Next Door: Ethnic Relations in American Communities. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hub Linssen
  • Louk Hagendoorn
  • Ludo Mateusen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations