Skip to main content

Sustainability, Justice and Market Relations

  • Chapter
Markets, the State and the Environment
  • 39 Accesses

Abstract

Policies that impose extra burdens on the least well off members of a society are contrary to the requirements of justice, as most of us understand them. Rawls’ theory of justice (Rawls 1972), which is supposed to be based on our ideas of fairness, insists that inequalities can only be justified if they provide maximum benefits to the least well off, and even rival conceptions of justice that are less egalitarian would rule out measures that benefit the wealthy at the expense of the poor or that disadvantage the least well off in a disproportionate way.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Attfield, R. and Wilkins, B. eds. (1992) International Justice and the Third World, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attfield, R. (1992) ‘Development and Environmentalism’ in R. Attfield and B. Wilkins (eds), International Justice and the Third World, Routledge, London.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bahro, R. (1982) Socialism and Survival, Heretic, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, P.T. (1971) Dissent on Development, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, P.T. (1981) Equality, the Third World and Economic Delusion, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, B. (1982) ‘Humanity and Justice in a Global Perspective’ in J. Pennock and J. Chapman (eds), Nomos XXIV: Ethics, Economics and the Law, New York University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beitz, C. (1979) Political Theory and International Relations, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnheim, J. (1986) ‘Democracy, Nation States and the World System’ in D. Held and C. Pollitt (eds), New Forms of Democracy, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dower, N. (1992) ‘Sustainability and the Right to Development’ in R. Attfield and B. Wilkins (eds), International Justice and the Third World, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckersley, R. (1992) Enviromentalism and Political Theory: Toward an Ecocentric Approach, UCL Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enzensberger, H. (1974) ‘A Critique of Polical Ecology’, New Left Review 84, 3–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, S. (1977) How the Other Half Dies: The Real Reason for World Hunger, Penguin, Harmondsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. (1980) Promethean Ethics, University of Washington Press, Seattle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, G. (1992) ‘Is there a Conflict Between Environmental Protection and the Development of the Third World’ in R. Attfield and B. Wilkins (eds), International Justice and the Third World, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, M. (1991) The Green Economy, Pluto Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machin, T. (1984) ‘Pollution and Political Theory’ in T. Regan (ed.), Earthbound: New Introductory Essays in Environmental Philosophy, Random House, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R. (1974) Anarchy, State and Utopia, Blackwell, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, O. (1986) Faces of Hunger: An Essay on Poverty, Justice and Development, Allen and Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passmore, J. (1974) Man’s Responsibility for Nature, Duckworth, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1972) A Theory of Justice, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sale, K. (1985) Dwellers in the Land: The Bioregional Vision, Sierra Club Books, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. (1992) Justice and World Order: A Philosophical Enquiry, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (1986) Declaration on the Right to Development 41/125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M. (1983) Spheres of Justice: A Defence of Pluralism and Equality, Martin Robertson, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (1990) World Development Report, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, R. (1980) ‘Population Problems, Coercion and Morality’ in D.S. Mannison, M.A. McRobbie and R. Routley (eds), Environmental Philosophy, Dept of Philosophy, RSSS, Monograph Series 2, Canberra, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1995 Robyn Eckersley and contributors

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thompson, J. (1995). Sustainability, Justice and Market Relations. In: Eckersley, R. (eds) Markets, the State and the Environment. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14022-0_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics