Abstract
Policies that impose extra burdens on the least well off members of a society are contrary to the requirements of justice, as most of us understand them. Rawls’ theory of justice (Rawls 1972), which is supposed to be based on our ideas of fairness, insists that inequalities can only be justified if they provide maximum benefits to the least well off, and even rival conceptions of justice that are less egalitarian would rule out measures that benefit the wealthy at the expense of the poor or that disadvantage the least well off in a disproportionate way.1
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Attfield, R. and Wilkins, B. eds. (1992) International Justice and the Third World, Routledge, London.
Attfield, R. (1992) ‘Development and Environmentalism’ in R. Attfield and B. Wilkins (eds), International Justice and the Third World, Routledge, London.
Bahro, R. (1982) Socialism and Survival, Heretic, London.
Bauer, P.T. (1971) Dissent on Development, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London.
Bauer, P.T. (1981) Equality, the Third World and Economic Delusion, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London.
Barry, B. (1982) ‘Humanity and Justice in a Global Perspective’ in J. Pennock and J. Chapman (eds), Nomos XXIV: Ethics, Economics and the Law, New York University Press, New York.
Beitz, C. (1979) Political Theory and International Relations, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Burnheim, J. (1986) ‘Democracy, Nation States and the World System’ in D. Held and C. Pollitt (eds), New Forms of Democracy, Sage, London.
Dower, N. (1992) ‘Sustainability and the Right to Development’ in R. Attfield and B. Wilkins (eds), International Justice and the Third World, Routledge, London.
Eckersley, R. (1992) Enviromentalism and Political Theory: Toward an Ecocentric Approach, UCL Press, London.
Enzensberger, H. (1974) ‘A Critique of Polical Ecology’, New Left Review 84, 3–31.
George, S. (1977) How the Other Half Dies: The Real Reason for World Hunger, Penguin, Harmondsworth.
Hardin, G. (1980) Promethean Ethics, University of Washington Press, Seattle.
Hunt, G. (1992) ‘Is there a Conflict Between Environmental Protection and the Development of the Third World’ in R. Attfield and B. Wilkins (eds), International Justice and the Third World, Routledge, London.
Jacobs, M. (1991) The Green Economy, Pluto Press, London.
Machin, T. (1984) ‘Pollution and Political Theory’ in T. Regan (ed.), Earthbound: New Introductory Essays in Environmental Philosophy, Random House, London.
Nozick, R. (1974) Anarchy, State and Utopia, Blackwell, London.
O’Neill, O. (1986) Faces of Hunger: An Essay on Poverty, Justice and Development, Allen and Unwin, London.
Passmore, J. (1974) Man’s Responsibility for Nature, Duckworth, London.
Rawls, J. (1972) A Theory of Justice, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Sale, K. (1985) Dwellers in the Land: The Bioregional Vision, Sierra Club Books, San Francisco.
Thompson, J. (1992) Justice and World Order: A Philosophical Enquiry, Routledge, London.
United Nations. (1986) Declaration on the Right to Development 41/125.
Walzer, M. (1983) Spheres of Justice: A Defence of Pluralism and Equality, Martin Robertson, Oxford.
World Bank. (1990) World Development Report, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Young, R. (1980) ‘Population Problems, Coercion and Morality’ in D.S. Mannison, M.A. McRobbie and R. Routley (eds), Environmental Philosophy, Dept of Philosophy, RSSS, Monograph Series 2, Canberra, Australia.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1995 Robyn Eckersley and contributors
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Thompson, J. (1995). Sustainability, Justice and Market Relations. In: Eckersley, R. (eds) Markets, the State and the Environment. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14022-0_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14022-0_12
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-65750-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-14022-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)