Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Global Competition and Environmental Regulation: Is the ‘Race to the Bottom’ Inevitable?

  • Chapter
Markets, the State and the Environment

Abstract

The relationship between international competitiveness and environmental standards is contentious and fraught with many uncertainties (GATT 1992). For some firms and industries, national environmental standards are considered a threat to their international competitiveness. For others, nation-based environmental standards are a threat to liberalised, global free trade. A common working hypothesis is that firms located in countries with high environmental standards are economically disadvantaged compared with firms located in countries with low environmental standards. Investment is thought to flee nations with high standards, since low standards or non-enforced standards represent, in effect, a subsidy to firms that produce and export from these locations.1 Moreover, high standards may be a barrier to free trade if they deny imported products a local market by virtue of the peculiarities of domestic environmental regulations. One way or another, or so it is supposed, rational economic policy makers are drawn to the lowest common denominator; local environmental standards are at risk in a world of international economic competition (Office of Technology Assessment 1992).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • ABARE. (1990) Submission to the Industry Commission. Mining and Minerals Processing: Industry Assistance, Taxation and the Environment, Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • ANZECC. (1991) A National Approach to Environmental Impact Assessment in Australia, Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W.J., Panzar, J.C. and Willig, R.D. (1988) Contestable Markets and the Theory of Market Structure, 2nd edn, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bebchuk, L. (1992) ‘Federalism and the Corporation: The Desirable Limits on State Competition in Corporate Law’, Harvard Law Review 105, 1437–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birdsall, N. and Wheeler, D. (1991) Openness Reduces Industrial Pollution in Latin America: The Missing Pollution Haven Effect, Symposium Paper, International Trade Division, World Bank, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, J. and Abouchar, J. (1991) ‘The Precautionary Principle: A Fundamental Principle of Law and Policy for the Protection of the Global Environment’, Boston College International and Comparative Law Review 14, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlton, D. and Perloff, J. (1990) Modern Industrial Organisation, Scott Foresman/Little Brown, Glenview, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cary, W.L. (1974) ‘Federalism and Corporate Law: Reflections Upon Delaware’, Yale Law Journal 83, 663–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G.L. (1994) ‘Strategy and Structure: Corporate Restructuring and the Scope and Characteristics of Sunk Costs’, Environment and Planning A26, 9–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ecologically Sustainable Development Steering Committee (ESDSC). (1992) National Strategy for Ecologically Sustainable Development, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edley, C. (1990) Administrative Law: Rethinking Judicial Control of Bureaucracy, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischel, D. (1982) ‘The “Race to the Bottom” Revisited: Reflections on Recent Developments in Delaware’s Corporation Law’, Northwestern University Law Review 76, 913–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • General Accounting Office (GAO). (1992a) US—Mexico Trade. Assessment of Mexico’s Environmental Controls for New Companies, GGD-92–113, General Accounting Office, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • GAO. (1992b) International Environment. International Agreements are Not Well Monitored, RCED-92–43, General Accounting Office, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • GAO. (1992c) International Environment. Strengthening the Implementation of Environmental Agreements, RCED-92–188, General Accounting Office, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • GATT. (1992) International Trade 90–91, Volume 1, General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaudet, G. and Lassere, P. (1988) ‘On Comparing Monopoly and Competition in Exhaustible Resource Exploitation’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 15, 412–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, K. (1990) ‘Australian Coal in the Global Context: A Paradox of Efficiency and Crisis’, Environment and Planning 22, 629–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G. and Helpman, E. (1990) ‘Trade, Innovation and Growth’, American Economic Review 80 (2), 86–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, R. and Stavins, R. (1991) Economic Incentives for Environmental Protection: Integrating Theory and Practice, CSIA Discussion Paper 91–15, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilly, S. (1989) ‘Trends in Steel Making Technology and Australia’s Mineral Exports’, Agricultural and Resources Quarterly 1, 48–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Agreement on the Environment (IGAE). (1992) Department of Arts, Sport, Environment and Territories, February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, D. (1991) ‘Turning to Market Democracy: A Tale of Two Architectures’, Harvard International Law Journal 32, 373–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (1990) Rethinking International Trade, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieven, D.C.B. (1992) Another Winter of Discontent: Continued Analysis of the Changes in East-Central Europe and Russia, IDS Fund Management, 69 Old Broad St, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littlewood, G. (1992) ‘RIO: A Postscript for the Mining Industry’, Paper presented to the American Mining Congress, Las Vegas, Nevada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, P. (1991) ‘Domestic Processing, Value Added and Globalisation’ in C. Hamilton (ed.), The Economic Dynamics of Australian Industry, Allen and Unwin, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • London Economics. (1992) The Impact of Global Warming Control Policies on Australian Industry, 91 New Cavendish St, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, A., Chisholm, A. and Porter, M. (eds). (1991) Markets, Resources and the Environment, Allen and Unwin, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Technology Assessment (1992) Trade and Environment: Conflicts and Opportunities, US Congress, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. (1990) The Competitive Advantage of Nations, Free Press, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. (1991) ‘America’s Green Strategy’, Scientific American 264 (4), 96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romano, R. (1990) The State Competition Debate in Corporate Law’ in L. Bebchuk (ed.), Corporate Law and Economic Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. (1986) ‘Increasing Returns and Long-run Growth’, Journal of Political Economy 94, 1002–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose-Ackerman, S. (1991) ‘Risk Taking and Ruin: Bankruptcy and Investment Choice’, Journal of Legal Studies 20, 277–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidheiny, S. with the Business Council for Sustainable Development. (1992) Changing Course: A Global Business Perspective on Development and the Environment, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Secretariat. (1992) Joint Session of Trade and Environment Experts, Synthesis Report: The Environmental Effects of Trade, Environment Directorate, OECD, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snape, R. (1992) The Environment, International Trade and Competitiveness’ in K. Anderson and R. Blackhurst (eds), The Greening of World Trade Issues, Harvester—Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, A.A. (1990) Why Nations Cooperate: Circumstance and Choice in International Relations, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, C. (1993a) ‘The Environmental Effects of Trade’, World Economy 16 (4), 439–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, C. (1993b) ‘The OECD Guiding Principles Revisited’, Environmental Law 23 (2), 607–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. (1976) ‘Monopoly and the Rate of Extraction of Exhaustible Resources’, American Economic Review 66, 655–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tietenberg, T.H. (1993) ‘Using Economic Incentives to Maintain Our Environment’ in H. Daly and K. Townsend (eds), Valuing the Earth: Economics, Ecology, Ethics, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Gordon L. Clark
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate School of Government, Monash University, Australia

    Robyn Eckersley

Copyright information

© 1995 Robyn Eckersley and contributors

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Clark, G.L. (1995). Global Competition and Environmental Regulation: Is the ‘Race to the Bottom’ Inevitable?. In: Eckersley, R. (eds) Markets, the State and the Environment. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14022-0_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation