Skip to main content

Clinical Effectiveness: The Challenge for Community Nursing

  • Chapter
Book cover Community Health Care Development

Part of the book series: Community Health Care Series ((CHCS))

  • 27 Accesses

Abstract

If this chapter were solely to report, concisely but fairly, the available evidence for the clinical effectiveness of community nursing services, it might be very short indeed. It is often said that there is little or no scientific evidence to support many health care interventions, but this evidentiary vacuum is more marked in some professions and care settings than in others. It seems to an outside observer that those working in community nursing services, such as district nursing, health visiting, practice nursing and school nursing, have remarkably little formal evidence with which to justify their patterns of clinical practice, or even in some cases their continued employment. There is a growing pressure on health care professionals in all disciplines and specialties, not just in the UK but internationally, to demonstrate the value of the services they provide. For community nurses in the NHS this challenge is particularly serious, because many of the services they deliver are already threatened by continuing changes resulting from the NHS reforms of 1989. In the 1990s, health care professions and organisations will increasingly have to demonstrate not only that they provide good quality care, at a low cost, but that their care is clinically and cost effective. Those who cannot or do not prove the effectiveness of what they do may not be doing it for much longer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Appleby, J., Walshe, K. and Ham, C. (1995) Acting on the Evidence. Birmingham: National Association for Health Authorites and Trusts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avis, M. (1994a) Reading research critically. 1. An introduction to appraisal: designs and objectives. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 3, pp. 227–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Avis, M. (1994b) Reading research critically — II. An introduction to appraisal: assessing the evidence. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 3(5), pp. 271–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barriball, K. L. and Mackenzie, A. (1992) The demand for measuring the impact of nursing interventions: a community perspective. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 1, pp. 207–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barriball, K. L. and Mackenzie, A. (1993) Measuring the impact of nursing interventions in the community: a selective review of the literature. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 18, pp. 401–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buttery, Y., Walshe, K., Coles, J. and Bennett, J. (1994) The Development of Audit. London: Clinical Accountability Service Planning and Evaluation Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, I. and Altman, D.G. (eds) (1995) Systematic Reviews. London: British Medical Journal Publishing Group

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, I. Enkin, M. and Keirse, M. (1993) Preparing and updating systematic review of randomised controlled trials of health care. Milbank Quarterly, 71(3), pp. 411–37.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, A. L. (1972) Effectiveness and Efficiency: Random Reflections on Health Services. Leeds: Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulter, A. (1995) Researching for health. In A. Harrison (ed.), Health Care UK 1994/95. London: King’s Fund Policy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deal, L.W. (1994) The effectiveness of community health nursing interventions: a literature review. Public Health Nursing, 11(5), pp. 315–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health (1993a). Report of the Taskforce on the Strategy for Research in Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting. London: Department of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health (1993b) Clinical Audit: Meeting and Improving Standards in Health Care. London: Department of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health (1995) Methods to Promote the Implementation of Research Findings in the NHS — Priorities for Evaluation. Report to the Central Research and Development Committee. London: Department of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, L. J. (1992) Maintaining excellence: the preservation and development of specialised services. British Medical Journal, 305, pp. 1280–3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, J. L., Frankel, S.J., Nanchahal, K., Coast, J. and Williams, M.H. (1994) Prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia. In A. Stevens and J. Raftery (eds), Health Care Needs Assessment, Vol. 2, Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky, M. and Ferguson, J. H. (1990) Analysis of the National Institutes of Health Medicare coverage assessment. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 6, pp. 480–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, J., Mulligan, I., Rowe, J. et al. (1995) Inpatient general medicine is evidence based. Lancet, 346, pp. 407–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freemantle, N. (1994) In Priority Setting in the NHS: Purchasing. Evidence submitted to the Health Select Committee. London: House of Commons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harley, M. (1995) Contact points: has increased hospital activity pushed up demand for community nursing? Health Service Journal, 105(5469), p. 29.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hopps, L. C. (1994) The development of research in nursing in the United Kingdom. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 6, pp. 199–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketley, D. and Woods, K.L. (1993) Impact of clinical trials on clinical practice: example of thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction. Lancet, 342, pp. 891–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lancet (1992). Glue ear guidelines: time to act on the evidence [editorial]. Lancet, 340, pp. 1324–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, B.V. (1993) Diagnostic dilatation and curettage in young women should be replaced by outpatient endometrial biopsy. British Medical Journal, 306, pp. 225–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, M. (1994) ‘It’s the little things that count’: the hidden complexity of everyday clinical nursing practice. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 3, pp. 361–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, R. J. (1984) Quality assessment in health. British Medical Journal, 288, pp. 1470–2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moffat, C.J. and O’Hare, L. (1995) Venous leg ulceration: treatment by high compression bandaging. Ostomy Wound Management, 41(4), pp. 16–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, F. and Smith, R. (1991). From audit to quality and beyond. British Medical Journal, 303, pp. 199–200.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mott, A. and Emond, A. (1994) What is the role of the distraction test of hearing? Archives of Disease in Childhood, 70(1), pp. 10–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Office of Technology Assessment (1983) The Impact of Randomised Controlled Trials on Health Policy and Medical Practice. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxman, A. (1994) No Magic Bullets. Report prepared for the North East Thames Regional Health Authority. McMaster, Canada: McMaster University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearcey, P.A. (1995) Achieving research-based nursing practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 22, pp. 33–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pomfret, I. (1995) Bladder irrigation. Journal of Community Nursing, (December), pp. 24–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, D. (1995) The need for evidence-based medicine. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 88, pp. 620–4.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, D. and Haynes, B. (1995) On the need for evidence-based medicine. Evidence-Based Medicine, 1, pp. 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. N. (1994) An analysis and reflections on the quality of nursing research in 1992. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19, pp. 385–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, L. H. and Bond, S. (1995) The effectiveness of nursing: a review. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 4, pp. 143–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, D. T. (1994) Stroke (acute cerebrovascular disease). In A. Stevens and J. Raftery (eds), Health Care Needs Assessment, Vol. 1. Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walshe, K. (1995a) Opportunities to improve the practice of clinical audit. Quality in Health Care, 4, pp. 231–2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walshe, K. (ed.) (1995b) Evaluating Clinical Audit: Past Lessons, Future Directions. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, C. and MacKenzie, J. (1993) Where are we now? Research mindedness in the 1990s. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 2, pp. 129–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, J.W., Goldschmidt, P.G. and Jullson, I.A. (1979) Medical Practice Information Demonstration Project: Final Report. Baltimore: Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson-Barnett, J. (1991) The experiment: is it worthwhile? International Journal of Nursing Studies, 28(1), pp. 77–87.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yates, J. (1995) You want to buy more surgery? Health Services Management Centre Newsletter, 1(1), p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1997 Kieran Walshe

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Walshe, K. (1997). Clinical Effectiveness: The Challenge for Community Nursing. In: Hennessy, D. (eds) Community Health Care Development. Community Health Care Series. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13906-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13906-4_8

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-64692-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-13906-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics