Abstract
Shakespeare’s Hamlet must be one of the world’s best-known stories. It has for example been filmed more often than any other narrative with the single and rather surprising exception of Cinderella.1 Yet people get it wrong. The printer of the 1623 First Folio text apparently made a slip in Hamlet’s apology to Laertes just before the duel in the final scene. In both the 1603 and the 1604 Quarto texts, Hamlet claims that any wrong he has done Laertes (by killing his father, for example, and driving his sister to madness and death) was committed accidentally: ‘I have shot my arrow o’er the house / And hurt my brother, (V.ii. 243–4).2 In the Folio text he says ‘I have shot my arrow o’er the house / And hurt my mother’. Horace Howard Furness in his 1877 Variorum edition of the play quotes Joseph Hunter’s 1845 speculation in support of ‘mother’: ‘The change in the Folio might have been made by Shakespeare after he retired to Stratford, the passage as it originally stood coming too near to an incident which had recently occurred in the family of Greville in that neighbourhood, where one of them had by misadventure killed his brother with an arrow.’3 Furness nevertheless prints ‘brother’ as do all other editors of the play, including those who privilege the Folio as Shakespeare’s own revision of his earlier text; they assume ‘mother’ is simply a misreading and correct it without feeling any need to comment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
This claim was made by Luke McKernan of the National Film and Television Archive in a programme note for the June 1994 season of Hamlet films at the National Film Theatre, London. McKernan is co-author with Olwen Terris of Walking Shadows: Shakespeare in the National Film and Television Archive (London: British Film Institute, 1994).
Joseph Hunter, New Illustrations of the Life, Studies, and Writings of Shakespeare (London: J.B. Nichols and Son, 1845) II, p. 265.
Anonymous compiler of publicity brochure for Shakespeare on Film, part of the Everybody’s Shakespeare International Festival, Barbican Centre, London, October–November 1994.
Gary Taylor (ed.), Henry V (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982) p. 61.
T.J.B. Spencer (ed.) Hamlet (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1980) p. 352.
‘Fratricide and Cuckoldry: Shakespeare’s Doubles’, reprinted in Murray M. Schwartz and Coppélia Kahn (eds), Representing Shakespeare (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1980) pp. 70–109.
Violence and the Sacred, Patrick Gregory trans. (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1977).
Eric Sams, The Real Shakespeare (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1995). See also Sams’ note ‘Hamnet or Hamlet, That is the Question’, Hamlet Studies (1995) pp. 94–8.
Harold Jenkins (ed.), Hamlet, The Arden Shakespeare (London: Methuen, 1982).
‘Mousetrap and Rat Man: An Uncanny Resemblance’, in Tetsuo Kishi, Roger Pringle and Stanley Wells (eds), Shakespeare and Cultural Traditions (Newark: University of Delaware, 1994) p.357.
T.S. Eliot famously called Hamlet an artistic failure in his Atheanaeum essay on ‘Hamlet and his Problems’ (1919), reproduced in H. Bloom (ed.), Hamlet (New York: Chelsea House, 1990) pp. 43–6.
Page 84, line 1, in Graham Holderness and Bryan Loughrey (eds), The Tragicall Historie of Hamlet Prince of Denmarke (Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1992).
Paul Werstine, ‘The Textual Mystery of Hamlet’, Shakespeare Quarterly 39 (1988), 1–26.
Barbara Mowat, ‘The Form of Hamlet’s Fortunes’, Renaissance Drama 19 (1988) 97–126.
G.R. Hibbard (ed.), Hamlet, The Oxford Shakespeare (Oxford: Clarendon, 1987).
See Michel Foucault’s chapter on the ‘Stultifera Navis’, in his Madness and Civilisation: a History of Insanity in the Age of Reason, R. Howard trans. (London: Tavistock, 1967) pp. 3–37.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1998 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Thompson, A., Taylor, N. (1998). ‘Father and Mother is One Flesh’: Hamlet and the Problems of Paternity. In: Spaas, L. (eds) Paternity and Fatherhood. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13816-6_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13816-6_23
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-13818-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-13816-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)