Abstract
Standards and procedures make a major contribution to the process of quality assurance. But under certain conditions the processes of standard setting and proceduralisation may become less helpful, or even counter-productive. This may happen, for example, when they become fetishised as ends in themselves, rather than used as tools in the pursuit of professional excellence. At their worst, standards may simply convey to staff the message ‘never mind your thoughts about this situation, this is what you have to do’.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 1998 Robert Adams
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Adams, R. (1998). Maintaining Quality: Standardisation and Proceduralism in Criminal Justice Work. In: Quality Social Work. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13733-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13733-6_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-63693-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-13733-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)