Skip to main content

Maintaining Quality: Standardisation and Proceduralism in Criminal Justice Work

  • Chapter
Quality Social Work
  • 88 Accesses

Abstract

Standards and procedures make a major contribution to the process of quality assurance. But under certain conditions the processes of standard setting and proceduralisation may become less helpful, or even counter-productive. This may happen, for example, when they become fetishised as ends in themselves, rather than used as tools in the pursuit of professional excellence. At their worst, standards may simply convey to staff the message ‘never mind your thoughts about this situation, this is what you have to do’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Copyright information

© 1998 Robert Adams

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Adams, R. (1998). Maintaining Quality: Standardisation and Proceduralism in Criminal Justice Work. In: Quality Social Work. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13733-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics