Skip to main content

Introduction: evaluating health care reform

  • Chapter
Book cover Changes in Health Care
  • 24 Accesses

Abstract

Economists argue that government intervention should begin with an analysis of the institutional failure it seeks to remedy, though politicians often start elsewhere. In the second half of the 1980s the Conservative government became increasingly interested in the application of market-type mechanisms to transactions within the National Health Service, and by 1991 it had introduced to the service reforms hailed as the most substantial since its inception. The major instrument of these reforms was the creation of a market internal to the NHS premised on a clear separation between purchasers and providers of health care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Appleby, J. et al. (1994) ‘Monitoring managed competion’, in: Robinson, R. and J. Le Grand (ed.) Evaluating the NHS reform (London: King’s Fund Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • Audit Commission (1996) What the Doctor Ordered: A study of GP Fund-holders in England and Waler (London: HMSO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baines, D. and D. Whynes (1996) ‘Selection bias in fundholding’, Health Economics, 5, 129–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, W. and J. Le Grand (1992) The Impact of the NHS Reforms on Hospital Costs: Some Preliminary Findings (SAUS Discussion Paper, University of Bristol).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulter, A. and J. Bradlow (1993) ‘Effect of the NHS reforms on general practitioner’s referral patterns’, British Medical Journal, 306, 433–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crump, B., Cubbon, B., Drummond, M., Hawkes, R., and Marchmant, M. (1991) Fundholding in general practice and financial risk, British Medical Journal, 302, 1582–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csaba, I. (1995) Hospital Costs and the regulated health market: An empirical analysis of the British health reforms (Paper presented at the 4th European Health Economics Association, Stockholm).

    Google Scholar 

  • Csaba, I. (1997) ‘Hospital costs, organisational slack and quasi-markets’, paper presented to the Health Economics Study Group, Liverpool.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csaba, I. and P. Fenn (1994) ‘Contractual Choice in the Managed Health Care Market — An Economic Model and Empirical Analysis’ (Discussion Paper 94.2, Oxford Centre for Health Economics Research).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenn, P., Rickman N., and McGuire, A. (1994) ‘Contracts, supply assurance and the delivery of health care’, Journal of Health Economics, 13, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, J., L. Fagan, W. Tierney, and R. Dittus (1987) ‘Changing patterns of hip fracture care before and after implementation of the prospective payment system’, Journal of the American Medical Association, 258, 218–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutterman, S. and A. Dobson (1986) ‘Impact of the Medicare prospective payment system for hospitals’, Health Care Financing Review, 7, 97–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glennerster, H., M. Matsaganis, P. Owen, and S. Hancock (1994) ‘GP fundholding: wild card or winning hand?’, in Robinson, R. and J. Le Grand (eds) Evaluating the NHS Reforms (London: King’s Fund Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • HMSO (1983) ‘The Management Enquiry’ The Griffiths Report (London: HMSO).

    Google Scholar 

  • HMSO (1990) ‘Funding and Contracts for Hospital Services’, NHS Review Working Paper (2) (London: HMSO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, K., E. Keeler, M. Sherwood, D. Rogers, D. Draper et al. (1990) ‘Comparing outcomes of care before and after implementation of the DRG prospective payment system’, Journal of the American Medical Association, 264, 1984–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, A., P. Fenn and K. Mayhew (eds) (1991) Providing Health Care (Oxford: OUP).

    Google Scholar 

  • Propper, C. (1994) Market structure and prices: the responses of hospitals in the UK NHS to competition (University of Bristol Discussion Paper, Nov. 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Quam, L. (1991) ‘Post war American health care: the many costs of market failure’, in McGuire et al. (eds) Providing Health Care (Oxford: OUP).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosho, M.D. and Broyles, R.W. (1987) ‘Short-term responses of hospitals to DRG prospective pricing mechanisms in New Jersey’, Medical Care, 25, 88–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, F., M. Morrisey and J. Valvona (1988) ‘Medicare prospective payment and the use of medical technologies in hospitals’ Medical Care, 26, 837–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soderlund, N., I. Csaba, A. Gray, R. Milne, and J. Raftery (1996) The Impact of the British reforms on hospital efficiency — an analysis of the first three years (Discussion paper, Department of Public Medicine, University of Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisbrod, B. (1991) ‘The health care quadrilemma: an essay on technological change, insurance, quality of care and cost containment’, Journal of Economic Literature, 24, 523–52.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1997 Paul Anand and Alistair McGuire

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McGuire, A., Anand, P. (1997). Introduction: evaluating health care reform. In: Anand, P., McGuire, A. (eds) Changes in Health Care. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13710-7_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics