Expertise: Knowledge, Power and Tradeability

  • James Fleck


Expertise is a subject of widespread and increasing interest. It is currently being analyzed from a number of very different disciplinary perspectives, as well-attested by the range of references cited in this book. Expertise has become a crucial issue for three related reasons.


Tacit Knowledge Social Utility Formal Knowledge Knowledge Asset Disciplinary Perspective 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. ARROW, K. (1962) ‘The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing’, Review of Economic Studies, XXIX(80) pp. 155–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. BASALLA, G. (1988) The Evolution of Technology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  3. BLACKLER, F. (1995) ‘Knowledge, Knowledge Work and Organizations: An Overview and Interpretation’, Organization Studies 6, pp. 1021–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. BRAUN, E. and MACDONALD, S. (1978) Revolution in Miniature: The History and Impact of Semiconductor Electronics (Cambridge: Cambridge University press).Google Scholar
  5. BRONOWSKI, J. (1978) The Origins of Knowledge and Imagination: The Silliman Lectures (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
  6. CARTER, A. P. (1989) ‘Knowhow Trading as Economic Exchange’, Research Policy 18, pp. 155–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. CLARKE, G. (1989) Expert Systems in the City IBC (London: Financial Books Ltd.).Google Scholar
  8. COCKBURN, C. (1983) Brothers: Male Dominance and Technological Change (London: Pluto Press).Google Scholar
  9. COLLINS, H. M. (1974) ‘The TEA Set: Tacit Knowledge and Scientific Networks’, Science Studies 4, pp. 165–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. COLLINS, H. M. (1990) Artificial Experts: Social Knowledge and Intelligent machines (Cambridge MA: The MIT Press).Google Scholar
  11. CONSTANT II, E. W. (1984) ‘Communities and Hierarchies: Structure in the Practice of Science and Technology’, in R. Laudan (ed.) The Nature of Technological Knowledge (Dordrecht: Reidel) pp. 27–46.Google Scholar
  12. COOPER, G. and WOOLGAR, S. (1994) ‘Software Quality as Community Performance’, in R. Mansell (ed.) Management of Information and Communication Technologies: Emerging Patterns of Control (London: Aslib) pp. 54–67.Google Scholar
  13. Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) (1990) Expert System Opportunities (London: HMSO).Google Scholar
  14. ELIAS, N. (1982) ‘Scientific Establishments’, in N. Elias, H. Martin and R. Whitley (eds), Scientific Establishments and Hierarchies, Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook VI (Dordrecht: Reidel) pp. 3–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. FISCHER, F. (1990) Technocracy and the Politics of Expertise (London: Sage).Google Scholar
  16. FLECK, L. (1979) Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact (Chicago: Chicago University Press). (Translation of original published in 1935.)Google Scholar
  17. FOUCAULT, M. P. (1980) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977 (edited by C. Gordon) (Brighton: Harvester Press).Google Scholar
  18. FREEMAN, C. (1982) The Economics of Industrial Innovation (2nd edition) (London: Frances Pinter).Google Scholar
  19. GIERE, R. N. (1988) Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. HORSLEY, W and BUCKLEY, R. (1990) Nippon: New Superpower: Japan since 1945 (London: BBC Books).Google Scholar
  21. HULL, D. L. (1988) Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science (Chicago: The University of Chicago press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Japan Information Processing Development Center (JIPDEC) (1980) JIPDEC Report Fifth-Generation Computers (Tokyo: JIPDEC).Google Scholar
  23. KNORR-CETINA, K. D. (1981) The Manufacture of Knowledge (Oxford: Pergamon Press).Google Scholar
  24. KUHN, T. S. (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
  25. LATOUR, B. and WOOLGAR, S. (1979) Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts (Beverly Hills: Sage).Google Scholar
  26. MACDONALD, S. (1993) ‘Nothing is Either Good or Bad: Industrial Espionage and Technology Transfer’, International Journal of Technology Management 8(1/2) pp. 95–105.Google Scholar
  27. MACHLUP, F. (1962) The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the US (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
  28. MASUDA, Y. (1990) Managing in the Information Society (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).Google Scholar
  29. MINTZBERG, H. (1979) The Structuring of Organizations (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall) pp. 46–53.Google Scholar
  30. NELKIN, D. (1977) ‘Creation vs. Evolution: The Politics of Science Education’, in E. Mendelsohn et al., The Social Production of Scientific Knowledge, Sociology of the sciences 1, pp. 265–87.Google Scholar
  31. OLSEN, M. E. (1968) The Process of Social Organization (London: Holt, Rinehart & Winston) p. 3.Google Scholar
  32. PACEY, A. (1992) The Culture of Technology (MA: MIT Press Cambridge).Google Scholar
  33. POLANYI, M. (1946) Science, Faith and Society (London: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  34. POLANYI, M. (1967) The Tacit Dimension (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
  35. POPPER, K. R. (1972) Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  36. PORTER, M. E. (1990) The Competitive Advantage of Nations (London: Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. RAVETZ, J. R. (1971) Scientific Knowledge and its Social Problems (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  38. SACKMANN, S. A. (1991) Cultural Knowledge in Organizations: Exploring the Collective Mind (London: Sage Publications).Google Scholar
  39. SMITH, C. D., CHILD, J. and ROWLINSON, M. (1987) Innovations in Work Organizations: The Cadbury Experience (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  40. SOLLA PRICE, D. DE (1984) ‘The Science/Technology Relationship: The Craft of Experimental Science and Policy on the Improvement of High Technology Innovation’, Research Policy, 13, pp. 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. SUPPE, F. (1974) ‘The Search for Philosophic Understanding of Scientific Theories’, in Suppe, F. (ed.) The Structure of Scientific Theories (Urbana: University of Illinois Press) pp. 1–241.Google Scholar
  42. SVIEBY, K. E. and LLOYD, T. (1987) Managing Know-How: Add Value by Valuing Creativity (London: Bloomsbury).Google Scholar
  43. TEECE, D. J. (1981) ‘The Market for Knowhow and the Efficient International Transfer of Technology’, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 458 November, pp. 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. VINCENTI, W. G. (1990) What Engineers Know and How They Know It (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar
  45. VON HIPPEL, E. (1987) The Sources of Innovation (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  46. WHIPP, R. and CLARK, P. A. (1986) Innovation and the Auto Industry: Product, Process and Work Organization (London: Frances Pinter).Google Scholar
  47. WHITLEY, R. (1984) The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
  48. WILLIAMSON, O. E. (1975) Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications (New York: The Free Press).Google Scholar
  49. WILLIAMSON, O. E. (1980) ‘The Organization of Work: a Comparative Institutional Assessment’ Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization 1, pp. 5–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. WINTER, S. (1987) ‘Knowledge and Competence as Strategic Assets’, in D. J. Teece (ed.) The Competitive Challenge: Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal (Cambridge, MA: Ballinger). pp. 159–84.Google Scholar
  51. ZUBOFF, S. (1988) In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power (Oxford: Heinemann Professional Publishing Ltd).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© James Fleck 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • James Fleck

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations