Abstract
To what extent can computers undertake ‘human’ tasks, and what role do people play when computers begin to do ‘their’ jobs? This chapter offers an empirical analysis of the scope of medical computers in everyday applications, using, as a vehicle for investigation, a machine that is designed to detect and measure human blood pressure (BP). The paper describes experiments using ‘novice’ volunteers who, following written instructions, attempted to measure BP with a traditional sphygmomanometer. Producing reasonable results proved extremely difficult: the procedure is inherently complicated. It is clear that more experienced staff also deviate from the ideal instruction-based model: variations in techniques and results are widespread. But fieldwork shows that the machine, introduced to standardize the process, is successful: it produces acceptable readings that are comparable over time. The paper investigates how the machine is able to do this. I argue that the division of tasks between human and sphygmomanometer, and between human and computer, has changed. The computer now performs what was previously a human task — but only a slice of the overall task. Furthermore, the computer uses a technique that is different from that traditionally used by people. The task is transformed during its automation. I suggest why some other tasks may be suitable for computerization, and why some that are not should remain essentially human, social activities.
Grateful acknowledgement is made to Sage Publications, London at Thousand Oaks, CA, for permission to reproduce this chapter from Social Studies of Science Many people have been kind enough to comment on drafts of this paper I am grateful to the audience at the ‘Exploring Expertise’ Workshop at Edinburgh University in November 1992, to the contributors to the Science Studies Group seminars at the University of Bath, and especially to Harry Collins.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
COLLINS H. M. (1985) Changing Order (London: Sage Publications, 1979).
COLLINS H. M. and KUSCH, M. (1995) ‘Two Kinds of Action: A Phenomenological Study’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. 55, pp. 799–819.
COLLINS, H. M. (1984) ‘Researching Spoonbending: Concepts and Methods of Participatory Research’, in C. Bell and H. Roberts (eds), Social Researching: Politics, Problems, Practice (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul) pp. 54–69.
COLLINS, H. M. (1990) Artiflcal Experts: Social Knowledge and Intelligent Machines (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
CRIKTON, (1992) A Guide to Blood Pressure Measurement Techniques (Bracknell, Berks: Critikon, 1992).
DREYFUS, H. L. (1992) What Computers Can’t Do (New York: Harper & Row; reprinted Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
FEIGENBAUM, A. and McCORDUCK. (1984) The Fifth Generation: Artificial Intelligence and Japan’s Computer Challenge to the World (London and Sydney: Pan Books).
FORSTER, F. K. and TURNEY, D. (1986) ‘Oscillometric Determination of Diastolic, Mean and Systolic Blood Presssure: A Numerical Model’, Journal of Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 108, pp. 359–64.
HARTLAND, J. (1993) ‘The Machinery of Medicine: An Analysis of Algorithmic Approaches to Medical Practice’, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Bath.
JAMIESON, M. J. et al. (1990) ‘The Measurement of Blood Pressure: Sitting or Supine, Once or Twice?’, Journal of Hypertension, Vol. 8, pp. 635–40.
MAXMEN, J. S. (1976) The Post Physician Era (New York: John Wiley).
MAXMEN, J. S. (1987) ‘Long Trends in Health Care: The Post Physician Era Reconsidered’ in D. Schwefel (ed.), Indicators and Trends in Health care (Berlin: Springer Verlag) pp. 109–15.
MILLER, B. F. and KEANE, C. B. (1978) The Encyclopedia and Dictionary Medicine, Nursing and Allied Health (London: W. B. Saunders & Co.) pp. 130–2.
O’BRIEN, E. and O’MALLEY, K. (1990) ‘Twenty Four Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring: A Review of Validation Data’, Journal of Hypertension, Vol. 8, Supplement 16, S11–S16.
PETRIE, J. C. et al. (1986) ‘British Hypertension Society Recommendations on Blood Pressure Measurement’, British Medical Journal, Vol. 239, (Sept.) pp. 611–15.
SEAMAN, D. (1985) ‘Should You Trust Automatic Blood Pressure Monitors?’ Nursing (Jan) quoted in Critikon (1986) Survey of Studies Involving the Dinamap Vital Signs Monitor (Bracknell, Berks: Critikon) p. 9.
WEZENBAUM, J. (1976) Computer Power and Human Reason: From Judgement to Calculation (San Francisco, CA: Freeman, 1976).
Editor information
Copyright information
© 1998 Joanne Hartland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hartland, J. (1998). Automating Blood Pressure Measurements: The Division of Labour and the Transformation of Method. In: Williams, R., Faulkner, W., Fleck, J. (eds) Exploring Expertise. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13693-3_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13693-3_14
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-13695-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-13693-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)