Skip to main content
  • 24 Accesses

Abstract

Within a period of less than a month, the United States twice took decisive steps in the fall of 1993 to bolster the advocates of trade liberalization. The Congressional approval of NAFTA in November was followed by agreement on completion of the Uruguay Round, more than seven years after its inauguration and three after its scheduled termination. This combination of new, but long-awaited, initiatives provides considerable reassurance to those afraid that the new Clinton Administration would deviate from long-standing United States commitment to expanded world trade as an essential element of global economic growth. And failure would have been ironic indeed, since even the countries of Africa and Latin America have finally, after decades, become adherents of a strategy of trade expansion as essential to their continuous economic development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1995 Gerry Helleiner, Shahen Abrahamian, Edmar Bacha, Roger Lawrence and Pedro Malan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fishlow, A. (1995). NAFTA: What Kind of Future?. In: Helleiner, G., Abrahamian, S., Bacha, E., Lawrence, R., Malan, P. (eds) Poverty, Prosperity and the World Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13658-2_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics