Skip to main content

The Market and the Location of Urban Land Uses

  • Chapter
Urban Land Economics and Public Policy

Abstract

Regardless of the geographical location, origin or size of an urban area, a rational pattern of land use evolves. Normally after an assessment of various advantages and disadvantages, the location of any activity is determined either by the desire to maximise (or realise satisfactory) profits in respect of business users of land, or to maximise (or obtain acceptable) utility in the case of residential and other non-business users. The urban land use pattern is determined mainly by activities competing for sites through the forces of demand and supply — demand being the quantity of property required at given prices or rents, and supply being the amount of property available at those prices and rents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. H. W. Richardson, Urban Economics (Penguin, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  2. W. Alonso, ‘A Theory of the Urban Land Market’, Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association, 6 (1960); Location and Land Use (Harvard University Press, 1964); ‘A Reformulation of Classical Location Theory and its Relation to Rent Theory’, Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association, 19 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Sinclair, ‘Von Thünen and Urban Sprawl’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 57 (1967); R. Goodchild and R. Munton, Development and the Landowner. An Analysis of the British Experience (George Allen & Unwin, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Fothergill, M. Kitson and S. Monk, Property and Industrial Development (Hutchinson, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. Keogh, ‘The Economics of Planning Gain’, in S. Barrett and P. Healey (eds), Land Policy: Problems and Alternatives (Gower, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. Hall, ‘A Problem with its Roots in the Distant Past’, Town and Country Planning (February 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Carr, ‘Malls Laugh as the High Streets Die’, Observer (28 June 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. Jones, ‘Small Shops, Big Implications’, Town and Country Planning (June 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hillier Parker, British Shopping Centre Development Master List (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Carr, ‘Malls laugh’.

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. Cheeseright, ‘An Awful Lot of Shopping in Manchester’, Financial Times (6 March 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. Cheeseright, ‘A Shop-around for the West Midlands Planners’, Financial Times (20 March 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. J. McGoldrick and M. G. Thompson, Regional Shopping Centres: Out-of-town Versus In-town (Avebury, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  15. B. Laurance, ‘High Street Shopping Not Dead Yet’, Guardian (3 October 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  16. I. Alexander, Office Location and Public Policy (Longman, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  17. The Dispersal of Government Work from London, Cmnd 5363 (HMSO, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  18. S. Shrouder, ‘Down to Business’, Chartered Surveyor Weekly (24 January 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  19. D. Keeble, ‘Industrial Change in the United Kingdom’, in W. F. Lever (ed.), Industrial Change in the United Kingdom (Longman, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  20. R. D. Dennis, Changes in Manufacturing Employment in the South East Region between 1976 and 1980 (Department of Trade and Industry, 1981); S. Fothergill and G. Gudgin, Unequal Growth: Urban and Regional Employment Change in the United Kingdom (Heinemann, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  21. W. F. Lever, ‘Urban Scale as a Determinant of Employment Growth or Decline’, in L. Collins (ed.), Industrial Decline and Regeneration (Department of Geography, University of Edinburgh, 1982); B. Moore, J. Rhodes and P. Tyler, ‘Geographical Variations in Industrial Costs’, Discussion Paper 12 (Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge, 1984); P. A. Wood, ‘The South East’, in P. J. Damesick and P. A. Wood (eds), Regional Problems, Problem Regions and Public Policy in the United Kingdom (Clarendon Press, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  22. D. Massey and R. A. Meegan, ‘Industrial Restructuring Versus the Cities’, Urban Studies, 15 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  23. N. Buck, I. Gordon and K. Young with J. Ermisch and L. Mills, The London Employment Problem (Oxford University Press, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  24. S. Fothergill, M. Kitson and S. Monk, Property and Industrial Development.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  30. A. W. Evans, The Economics of Residential Location (Macmillan, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  31. R. H. Ellis, ‘Modelling of Household Location — ‘A Statistical Approach’, Highway Research Record, 207 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  32. M. A. Stegman, ‘Accessibility Models and Residential Location’, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  33. H. W. Richardson, Urban Economics (Penguin, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1995 Paul N. Balchin, Gregory H. Bull and Jeffrey L. Kieve

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Balchin, P.N., Bull, G.H., Kieve, J.L. (1995). The Market and the Location of Urban Land Uses. In: Urban Land Economics and Public Policy. Building and Surveying Series. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13652-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13652-0_3

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-62903-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-13652-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics