Skip to main content

Spatial Structure and Urban Growth

  • Chapter
Urban Land Economics and Public Policy

Abstract

The ability of activities to compete for sites depends upon whether they have the means to benefit from accessibility and complementarity within the urban framework. But economic conditions, population, other land uses both public and private, and the size of the urban area continually change, subjecting the urban land market to forces of perpetual adjustment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. H. von Thünen, Der Isolierte Staat, 1826; English translation by C. M. Wartenberg, Von Thünen’s Isolated State (Pergamon, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. W. Burgess, ‘The Growth of the City’, in R. E. Park et al., The City (University of Chicago Press, 1925).

    Google Scholar 

  3. H. Hoyt, The Structure and Growth of Residential Neighbourhoods in American Cities (Federal Housing Administration, 1939).

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. H. Mann, An Approach to Urban Sociology (Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. D. Harris and E. L. Ullman, ‘The Nature of Cities’ in P. K. Hatt and A. J. Reiss (eds), Cities and Society (The Free Press, 1951).

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. A. Stone, Urban Development in Britain: Standards, Costs and Resources, 1964–2004, Vol. 1, Population Trends and Housing (National Institute for Economic and Social Research, Cambridge University Press, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  7. W. Firey, ‘Ecological Considerations in Planning for Urban Fringes’, in P. K. Hatt and A. J. Reiss (eds), Cities and Society (The Free Press, 1951).

    Google Scholar 

  8. W. Christaller, Die Zentralen Orte in Suddeutschland (Fisher, 1933).

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. E. Smailes, ‘The Urban Hierarchy in England and Wales’, Geography, 29 (1944).

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. D. P. Smith, ‘The Changing Urban Hierarchy’, Regional Studies, 2 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Schiller, ‘A Ranking of Centres Using Multiple Branch Numbers’, Estates Gazette (23 March, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  12. B. J. L. Berry and W. L. Garrison, ‘Recent Development of Central Place Theory’, Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association, 4 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. R. Pred, The Spatial Dynamics of U.S. Urban-Industrial Growth 1800–1914 (M.I.T. Press, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. M. Keynes, The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money (Macmillan, 1936).

    Google Scholar 

  15. W. Isard, Location and Space Economy (MIT Press, 1956).

    Google Scholar 

  16. W. Leontief and A. A. Strout, ‘Multiregional Input-Output Analysis’ in T. Barna (ed.), Structural Interdependence and Economic Development (Macmillan, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  17. W. Alonso et al., Regional Development and Planning: A Reader (M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass. 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. Potter, ‘External Manufacturing Investment in a Peripheral, Rural Region: The Case of Devon and Cornwall, Regional Studies, 27 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  19. P. Tyler and B. C. Moore, ‘Geographical Variations in Industrial Costs’, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 35 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  20. W. Isard, Location and Space Economy, (John Wiley, 1956).

    Google Scholar 

  21. H. W. Richardson, Regional Growth Theory (Macmillan, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  22. P. N. Townroe and N. J. Roberts, Local-External Economies for British Manufacturing Industry (Gower, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  23. R. L. Moomaw, ‘Agglomeration Economies: Localisation or Urbanisation’, Urban Studies, 25 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  24. G. A. Carlino, ‘Manufacturing Agglomeration Economies and Returns to Scale: A Production Function Approach, Paper and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association, 50 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  25. See H. Louri, ‘Urban Growth and Productivity: The Case of Greece’, Urban Studies, 25 (1988), for an example of this line of argument. It can be noted that almost half of all economic activity in Greece is concentrated in the Athens region.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Commission of the European Communities, ‘Le Cout des Concentrations Urbaines et la Dépopulation Rutale dans la CEE’, Working Paper (European Commission, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  27. I. Hoch, ‘Urban Scale and Environmental Quality’, in R. G. Ridker (ed.), Population, Resources and the Environment, US Commission on Population Growth and the American Future Research Report III (USGPO, Washington DC, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  28. N. Vanhove and L. H. Klassen, Regional Policy: A European Approach (Saxon House, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  29. F. McLintock and N. Avison, Crime in England and Wales (Heinemann, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  30. K. R. Cox, Location and Public Problems (Basil Blackwell, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  31. V. R. Fuchs, Differentials in Hourly Earnings by Region and City Size (National Bureau of Economic Research, Washington DC, 1959); W. Alonso, ‘The Economics of Urban Size’, Regional Science Association Papers, 26 (1971); I. Hoch, ‘Income and City Size’, Urban Studies, 9 (1972); I. Hoch, ‘City Size and US Urban Policy’, Urban Studies, 24 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  32. H. W. Richardson, Regional and Urban Economics (Penguin, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  33. I. Hoch, ‘City Size Effects, Trends and Policies’, Science, 193 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  34. F. W. Porrell, ‘Intermetropolitan Migration and Quality of Life, Journal of Regional Science, 22 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  35. I. Hoch, ‘City Size and US Urban Policy’, Urban Studies, 24 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  36. This outcome could also arise from a sudden large rise in rural/urban migration or international migration, if either produced significant downward pressure, on urban wage rates in particular. This is, however, thought to be less likely in the North European context and is not considered further.

    Google Scholar 

  37. H. W. Richardson, Regional and Urban Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  38. B. Walker, Welfare Economics and Urban Problems (Hutchinson, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  39. N. Vanhove and L. Klassen, Regional Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  40. B. Begovic, ‘The Economic Approach to Optimal City Size’, Progress in Planning, 36, (1991). The study is, however, confined to business agglomeration economies.

    Google Scholar 

  41. P. Gordon, A. Kumar and H. W. Richardson, ‘Congestion, Changing Metropolitan Structure and City Size’, mimeo, School of Urban & Regional Planning, University of Southern California (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  42. B. Begovic, ‘Economic Approach to Optimal City Size’.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1995 Paul N. Balchin, Gregory H. Bull and Jeffrey L. Kieve

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Balchin, P.N., Bull, G.H., Kieve, J.L. (1995). Spatial Structure and Urban Growth. In: Urban Land Economics and Public Policy. Building and Surveying Series. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13652-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13652-0_2

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-62903-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-13652-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics