Abstract
Norman Malcolm once observed that, in Western academic philosophy, religious belief is commonly regarded as unreasonable and is viewed with condescension or even contempt. Malcolm himself did not, of course, take this view, but it is one which will be familiar to most philosophers, even if they do not themselves hold it. Nor need Malcolm’s observation be restricted only to the realm of academic philosophy. For there are many atheists who, rightly or wrongly, seeing themselves as untouched by philosophy, would nevertheless subscribe to the view that religious belief is of its very nature confused or in some way intellectually inadequate. So, I had better start by saying that, though an atheist, I do not number myself among them. It is not, however, my aim in this paper to defend religion against such attacks but rather to turn my attention to an analogous attitude amongst those who would count themselves religious believers. And once again, this attitude is not one which is restricted to academic philosophers, but finds its counterpart amongst the general populace. It is moreover, like the view which Malcolm castigates, often marked by condescension, or even contempt, attitudes which are, by contrast, directed in this case towards the atheist.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Kai Nielsen, Ethics Without God ( London: Pemberton Books, 1973 ), P. 48.
Leszek Kolakowski, Religion ( New York: Oxford University Press 1982 ).
G. E. M. Anscombe, ‘Modern Moral Philosophy’, in The Collected Papers of G. E. M. Anscombe, Vol. III ( Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1981 ), p. 30.
Pablo Casals, quoted in R. Gaita, Good and Evil: An Absolute Conception ( London: Macmillan, 1991 ), pp. 214–15.
Hank Williams Jr Living Proof (New York: Dell/James A. Bryans, 1983) pp. 130–1.
John Newman, The Grammar of Assent, ed. C. F. Harrold ( Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1947 ), p. 83.
L. Wittgenstein, Zettel (Oxford: Basil Blackwell), section 540.
Quoted in T. Huddlestone, Dying We Live ( London: Fontana Books, 1965 ), p. 88.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1996 The Claremont Graduate School
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Beardsmore, R.W. (1996). Atheism and Morality. In: Phillips, D.Z. (eds) Religion and Morality. Claremont Studies in the Philosophy of Religion. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13558-5_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13558-5_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-13560-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-13558-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)