Skip to main content

Atheism and Morality

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Claremont Studies in the Philosophy of Religion ((CSPR))

Abstract

Norman Malcolm once observed that, in Western academic philosophy, religious belief is commonly regarded as unreasonable and is viewed with condescension or even contempt. Malcolm himself did not, of course, take this view, but it is one which will be familiar to most philosophers, even if they do not themselves hold it. Nor need Malcolm’s observation be restricted only to the realm of academic philosophy. For there are many atheists who, rightly or wrongly, seeing themselves as untouched by philosophy, would nevertheless subscribe to the view that religious belief is of its very nature confused or in some way intellectually inadequate. So, I had better start by saying that, though an atheist, I do not number myself among them. It is not, however, my aim in this paper to defend religion against such attacks but rather to turn my attention to an analogous attitude amongst those who would count themselves religious believers. And once again, this attitude is not one which is restricted to academic philosophers, but finds its counterpart amongst the general populace. It is moreover, like the view which Malcolm castigates, often marked by condescension, or even contempt, attitudes which are, by contrast, directed in this case towards the atheist.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Kai Nielsen, Ethics Without God ( London: Pemberton Books, 1973 ), P. 48.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Leszek Kolakowski, Religion ( New York: Oxford University Press 1982 ).

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. E. M. Anscombe, ‘Modern Moral Philosophy’, in The Collected Papers of G. E. M. Anscombe, Vol. III ( Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1981 ), p. 30.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pablo Casals, quoted in R. Gaita, Good and Evil: An Absolute Conception ( London: Macmillan, 1991 ), pp. 214–15.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hank Williams Jr Living Proof (New York: Dell/James A. Bryans, 1983) pp. 130–1.

    Google Scholar 

  6. John Newman, The Grammar of Assent, ed. C. F. Harrold ( Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1947 ), p. 83.

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. Wittgenstein, Zettel (Oxford: Basil Blackwell), section 540.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Quoted in T. Huddlestone, Dying We Live ( London: Fontana Books, 1965 ), p. 88.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1996 The Claremont Graduate School

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Beardsmore, R.W. (1996). Atheism and Morality. In: Phillips, D.Z. (eds) Religion and Morality. Claremont Studies in the Philosophy of Religion. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13558-5_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics