Part of the Midwifery Practice Series book series
We are likely to remember all the cases of shoulder dystocia that we are ever involved with. They are amongst the most terrifying experiences that midwifery or obstetrics has to offer.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Allott H 1994 A grief shared. British Medical Journal 308: 602Google Scholar
- Barnum CG 1945 Dystocia due to the shoulders. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 50: 439–442Google Scholar
- Chemlow D, Kilpatrick SJ, Laros RK 1993 Maternal and neonatal outcomes after prolonged latent phase. Obstetrics and Gynecology 81 (4): 486–91Google Scholar
- Gaskin IM 1988 Shoulder dystocia: controversies in management. Birth Gazette 5 (1): 14–17Google Scholar
- Hopwood HG 1982 Shoulder dystocia: fifteen years experience in a community hospital. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 29 (2): 162–6Google Scholar
- O’Leary JA 1992 Shoulder dystocia and birth injury: prevention and treatment. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Parks DG, Ziel HK 1978 Macrosomia: A proposed indication for primary cesarean section. Obstetrics and Gynecology 52(4): 407–9Google Scholar
- Seidman DS, Ever-Hadani P, Stevenson DK, Slater PE, Harlap S, Gale R 1988 Birth order and birth weight re-examined. Obstetrics and Gynecology 72: 2Google Scholar
- Seigworth GR 1966 Shoulder dystocia: review of five years experience. Obstetrics and Gynecology 25 (6): 764–7Google Scholar
- Smellie W 1730 Treatise on the theory and practice of midwifery Reprinted 1887 McLintock A, (ed) New Sydenham Society, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Tolin J 1992 The attorney’s viewpoint. In O’Leary JA, (ed) Shoulder dystocia and birth injury: prevention and treatment. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Woods CE 1943 A principle of physics as applied to shoulder delivery. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 45: 796–805Google Scholar
© Terri Coates 1995