Abstract
Four Quartets is generally understood to be the work of a Christian artist with a consistent religious and moral vision. Accordingly, although it is accepted that Eliot’s terms of reference widen from one Quartet to another, the possibility that he may in mid-course have actually begun to change his mind on a fundamental issue is almost never considered. And yet this is, I believe, the only true and possible explanation for the rather confused tone of hesitancy and ponderousness one has come to associate with Eliot’s third Quartet.
Every work of art adheres to some system of morality. But if it be really a work of art, it must contain the essential criticism on the morality to which it adheres…. The degree to which the system of morality, or the metaphysic, is submitted to criticism within the work of art makes the lasting value and satisfaction of that work.
(D. H. Lawrence, Phoenix 1)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
F. R. Leavis, The Living Principle (London, 1975 ) pp. 232, 235.
See Hans Urs von Balthasar, Prayer (New York, 1967) p. 64.
C. A. Bodelsen, T. S. Eliot’s ‘Four Quartets’: A Commentary (Copenhagen, 1966 ) p. 80.
A. D. Moody, Thomas Stearns Eliot: Poet (Cambridge, 1979 ) pp. 203 – 22.
T. S. Eliot, The Idea of a Christian Society and Other Writings (London, 1982; first published 1939 ) p. 88.
Quoted by B. A. Harries, ‘The Rare Contact: a Correspondence between T. S. Eliot and P. E. More’, Theology, 75 (1972) p. 140.
See T. S. Eliot, ‘Paul Elmer More’, Princeton Alumni Weekly, xxxviii.17 (5 February 1937 ) p. 373.
See Ranjee Shahani, ‘T. S. Eliot Answers Questions’, John O’London’s Weekly (London), Lvw.1369 (19 August 1949 ) p. 498.
T. S. Gregory, a review of Kierkegaard: His Life and Thought by E. L. Allen, in Criterion, xv. 59 (January 1936) pp. 306 – 7.
T. S. Eliot, ‘An Emotional Unity’, Dial, Lxxxiv.2 (February 1928) p. 110.
T. S. Eliot, After Strange Gods (London, 1934 ) p. 48.
Alessandro Pellegrini, ‘A London Conversation with T. S. Eliot’, trans. Joseph Frank, Sewanee Review, 57 (Spring 1949 ) p. 288.
F. R. Leavis, The Living Principle (London, 1975 ) p. 239.
E. L. Allen, Kierkegaard: His Life and Thought (London, 1935 ) pp. 144 – 5.
Seren Kierkegaard, Efterladte Papirer (Copenhagen, 1881) p. 31. The passage was quoted by Walter Lowrie in Kierkegaard, p. 562.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1991 Paul Murray
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Murray, P. (1991). Mysticism under Scrutiny: The Influence of Seren Kierkegaard. In: T. S. Eliot and Mysticism. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13463-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13463-2_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-61406-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-13463-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)