Skip to main content

Mysticism under Scrutiny: The Influence of Seren Kierkegaard

  • Chapter
T. S. Eliot and Mysticism
  • 51 Accesses

Abstract

Four Quartets is generally understood to be the work of a Christian artist with a consistent religious and moral vision. Accordingly, although it is accepted that Eliot’s terms of reference widen from one Quartet to another, the possibility that he may in mid-course have actually begun to change his mind on a fundamental issue is almost never considered. And yet this is, I believe, the only true and possible explanation for the rather confused tone of hesitancy and ponderousness one has come to associate with Eliot’s third Quartet.

Every work of art adheres to some system of morality. But if it be really a work of art, it must contain the essential criticism on the morality to which it adheres…. The degree to which the system of morality, or the metaphysic, is submitted to criticism within the work of art makes the lasting value and satisfaction of that work.

(D. H. Lawrence, Phoenix 1)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. F. R. Leavis, The Living Principle (London, 1975 ) pp. 232, 235.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See Hans Urs von Balthasar, Prayer (New York, 1967) p. 64.

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. A. Bodelsen, T. S. Eliot’s ‘Four Quartets’: A Commentary (Copenhagen, 1966 ) p. 80.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. D. Moody, Thomas Stearns Eliot: Poet (Cambridge, 1979 ) pp. 203 – 22.

    Google Scholar 

  5. T. S. Eliot, The Idea of a Christian Society and Other Writings (London, 1982; first published 1939 ) p. 88.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Quoted by B. A. Harries, ‘The Rare Contact: a Correspondence between T. S. Eliot and P. E. More’, Theology, 75 (1972) p. 140.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See T. S. Eliot, ‘Paul Elmer More’, Princeton Alumni Weekly, xxxviii.17 (5 February 1937 ) p. 373.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See Ranjee Shahani, ‘T. S. Eliot Answers Questions’, John O’London’s Weekly (London), Lvw.1369 (19 August 1949 ) p. 498.

    Google Scholar 

  9. T. S. Gregory, a review of Kierkegaard: His Life and Thought by E. L. Allen, in Criterion, xv. 59 (January 1936) pp. 306 – 7.

    Google Scholar 

  10. T. S. Eliot, ‘An Emotional Unity’, Dial, Lxxxiv.2 (February 1928) p. 110.

    Google Scholar 

  11. T. S. Eliot, After Strange Gods (London, 1934 ) p. 48.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Alessandro Pellegrini, ‘A London Conversation with T. S. Eliot’, trans. Joseph Frank, Sewanee Review, 57 (Spring 1949 ) p. 288.

    Google Scholar 

  13. F. R. Leavis, The Living Principle (London, 1975 ) p. 239.

    Google Scholar 

  14. E. L. Allen, Kierkegaard: His Life and Thought (London, 1935 ) pp. 144 – 5.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Seren Kierkegaard, Efterladte Papirer (Copenhagen, 1881) p. 31. The passage was quoted by Walter Lowrie in Kierkegaard, p. 562.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1991 Paul Murray

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Murray, P. (1991). Mysticism under Scrutiny: The Influence of Seren Kierkegaard. In: T. S. Eliot and Mysticism. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13463-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics