Skip to main content

Academic Iconoclast

  • Chapter
  • 25 Accesses

Part of the book series: St Antony’s/Macmillan Series ((STANTS))

Abstract

The arrival of Tomáš Garrigue Masaryk in Prague in 1882 was charged with significance for modern Czech history and was to cause an upheaval in the history of the nation. Jan Herben, his devoted admirer and one of his biographers, wrote in 1898 that the decade of the 1880s was a time of a ‘revolution in ideas in Czech life; new strivings and new yearnings were born; new fractions and tendencies were formed’. This ferment developed in and from the Czech university, which had been created by the partition of the Charles-Ferdinand University into Czech and German parts.1 Professor Masaryk, newly arrived at the Czech university in its first year as a separate institution, stirred up controversy almost immediately by his teaching and by his day-to-day actions. He soon made the university a platform for an effort to influence the Czech intelligentsia and to reform Czech life in all its aspects, educationally , culturally and politically.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Jan Herben, Deset let proti proudu (1886–1896) (Prague, 1898), p. 3,

    Google Scholar 

  2. republished in somewhat revised form in Herben, Kniha vzpomínek (Prague, 1935);

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zdeněk Nejedlý, T. G. Masaryk (4 vols., Prague, 1935), III, pp. 3–7, 20.

    Google Scholar 

  4. On his appointment, see Jaroslav Opat, Filozof a politik. Tomáš G. Masaryk, 1882–1893 (Prague, 1937);

    Google Scholar 

  5. also Karel Čapek, Hovory s T. G Masarykem (Prague, 1937), pp. 47–52.

    Google Scholar 

  6. On Masaryk’s first years at the university, see Jaromír Doležal, Masarykova cesta životem (Brno, 1920), Part I, pp. 33–53;

    Google Scholar 

  7. Simon R. Green, Thomas Garrigue Masaryk: Educator of a Nation, PhD thesis, University of California, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  8. For an excellent analysis of the atmosphere at the university see Milan Machovec, Tomáš G. Masaryk (Prague, 1968), chap. 4;

    Google Scholar 

  9. See her chapter on the philosophical faculty after 1882 in Ferdinand Seibt (ed.), Die Teilung der Prager Universität 1882 und die intellektuelle Desintegration in den böhmischen Ländern (Munich, 1984), espec. pp. 96–7, 107–10.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Albín Bráf, Źivot a dílo, ed. by Josef Gruber and Cyril Horáček (Prague, 1922–24), I, pp. 15–27.

    Google Scholar 

  11. For a critical review of Masaryk’s scholarship and its inadequacies, see Kamil Krofta, Masaryk a jeho dílo vědecké (Prague, 1930).

    Google Scholar 

  12. For a collection of critical reviews of many of Masaryk’s writings, see Jan Patočka, Masaryk, Soubor statí, přednášek a poznámek (samizdat, Prague, 1979);

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tři studie, o Masarykovi (Prague, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hoffmann, T. G. Masaryk und die tschechische Frage (Munich, 1988), pp. 75–8; Nejedlý, Masaryk, IV, pp. 101–11

    Google Scholar 

  15. For a detailed analysis of the encyclopedia project, see Stanley B. Winters, ‘Jan Otto, T. G. Masaryk, and the Czech National Encyclopedia,’ Jahrbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas, 31 (1893), pp. 516–42.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Other scholars who meted out sharp criticism of Masaryk’s literary theory were Karel Brušák, in ‘Masaryk and Belles-Lettres’, in T G. Masaryk (1850–1937), Vol. 2, Thinker and Critic, ed. by Robert B. Pynsent (London, 1989), chap. 10,

    Google Scholar 

  17. and Robert B. Pynsent, ‘Masaryk and Decadence’, ibid., I, Thinker and Politician, ed. by Stanley B. Winters (London, 1990), chap. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  18. For praise of Masaryk’s work in linguistics, see Roman Jakobson, ‘Problem of Language in Masaryk’s Writings’, in M. Čapek and K. Hrubý, (eds.), Masaryk in Perspective (n. p. 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Škrach, in Masaryk myslitel (Prague, 1938);

    Google Scholar 

  20. on humanity, democracy and the Czech question, Otto Urban, ‘Masarykovo pojetí české otázky’, Československý časopis historický, 17 (1969), pp. 525–52;

    Google Scholar 

  21. For critical analysis of Masaryk’s theory of Czech history, see two essays originally published in samizdat, in Václav Černý, Dvě studie Masarykovské (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  22. and Jan Patočka, Dvě studie o Masarykovi (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Masaryk, Jan Hus, Naše obrození a naše reformace, first published in 1896 (Prague, 1923), p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  24. See also Palacký’s religious interpretation of Czech nationality and humanism as set forth by Masaryk, Palackého idea národa českého (first published in 1898 (3rd edn., Prague, 1926), chaps 2, 7, espec. pp. 177–8.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Masaryk, Karel Havlíček (Prague, 1896), chap. IX, XIV, espec. p. 242.

    Google Scholar 

  26. However, he praised socialism for its rejection of extreme nationalism and its international approach: Masaryk, Otázka sociální (Prague, 1948), I, p. 263, II, pp. 159–65, 217–18, 230, 297 (Masaryk on Marx (Lewisburg, 1972), I, p. 185, II, pp. 288–95, 313–14, 324, 342–3. For more on Marxism and the use of violence, see Chapter 2 below.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pekař, ‘Masaryková česká filosofie’, Český časopis historický, XVIII (1912), pp. 12, 34, 44.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Josef Kaizl, České myšlenky (2nd. edn., Prague, 1896), espec. chap 1; on the state, chap. 4. Antonín Hajn agreed with Kaizl on the role of Western enlightenment in the thinking of the awakeners.

    Google Scholar 

  29. See his review, Rozhledy, V, no. 4 (1896), given in Hajn, Výbor práci 1889–1909 (Prague 1912), pp. 429–39.

    Google Scholar 

  30. See also Milan Hauner, ‘The Meaning of Czech History: Masaryk and Pekař’, ibid., Vol. 3. Statesman and Cultural Force (London, 1990), ed. by Harry Hanak, chap. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  31. see Jaroslav Opat, ‘Nad jednou knihu o realismu T. G. Masaryka (Obsah, samizdat, February 1986); for her reply, ibid., September 1986. For criticism of the more political aspects of Masaryk’s position by Kaizl and Hajn, see Chapter 3 below.

    Google Scholar 

  32. F. Plamínková, ed., Masaryk a ženy (Prague, 1930), pp. 195–7, 242–4, 278–9, 286, 301, 303, 328.

    Google Scholar 

  33. T. G. Masaryk and B. Odstrčil, Přechod ze střední na školu vysokou (Prague, 1913), pp. 13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  34. See his introduction to Bunge, K otázcealkoholu, a lecture given in 1886 (Prague, 1906)

    Google Scholar 

  35. He is reported to have rejected his physician’s advice to drink a glass of beer daily (Josef J. Filipi, S Masarykovými, Hrst vzpomínek (Prague, 1947) p. 102).

    Google Scholar 

  36. For the above, and the following, see R. Wolf, České studentstvo v době prvního třícetiletí české university (1882–1912), (Prague, 1912);

    Google Scholar 

  37. Karen J. Freeze, The Young Progressives: The Czech Student Movement, 1887–1897 (PhD thesis, Columbia University, 1974);

    Google Scholar 

  38. Bruce M. Garver, The Young Czech Party, 1874–1901 and the Emergence of a Multi-Party System (New Haven, 1978), pp. 143–6, 168–89, 447, n. 56;

    Google Scholar 

  39. Zdeněk Tobolka, Politické dějiny Československého národa od r. 1848 až do dnešní doby (Prague, 1936), III, 2, pp. 47–59;

    Google Scholar 

  40. Of some use is the poorly organized book by Václav Gutwirth, Masaryk a studentstvo (Prague, 1924).

    Google Scholar 

  41. The most detailed studies are those by Jan Havránek, ‘Počátky a kořeny pokrokového hnutí studentského na počátku devadesátých let 19. století,’ Acta Universitatis Carolinae Pragensis, Historia Universitatis, Carolinae Pragensis, 2, no. 1 (1961), pp. 5–33’;

    Google Scholar 

  42. For the trial, ibid., chap. 6. For the student demonstrations, see Havránek, ‘Protirakouské hnutí dělnické mládeže a studentů a události roku 1893,’ Acta Universitatis Carolinae — Historia Universitatis, 2, no. 2 (1961), 21–85.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wolf, Ceske studentstva, p. 111, and the whole of Part II. A detailed study of the conflicting tendencies among the students, and a critical analysis of Masaryk’s relations with each, is given by František Červenka, Boje a směry českého studentstva na sklonku minulého a na počátku našeho století (Prague, 1962). See especially chap. 1 and passim, as indicated by the index.

    Google Scholar 

  44. For earlier parliamentary speeches on education, 6 and 30 June, 1891, see Jiří Kovtun, Slovo má poslanec Masaryk (Munich, 1985), pp. 33–6, 42–7.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Český učitel (1899–1900), full text not available, extensive citations given in J. B. Kozák ed., Masaryková práce (Prague, 1930), in chapter entitled ‘Masaryk pedagog’, pp. 251–86.

    Google Scholar 

  46. E. Rádl, T. G. Masaryk, lecture given 13 December 1918 (Prague, 1919), p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1994 H. Gordon Skilling

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Skilling, H.G. (1994). Academic Iconoclast. In: T. G. Masaryk. St Antony’s/Macmillan Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13392-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13392-5_1

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-13394-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-13392-5

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics