Skip to main content

Abstract

More than ever, the long-term success of manufacturing as well as service firms hinges on effective response to technological change. Globalization, combined with a quicker pace of innovation, make timely technological adaptation a business imperative. Decisions about technological innovation occur at several levels within the firm. The highest level is that of strategic planning, notably investment in perceived ‘strategic assets’ (see Amit and Schoemaker, 1992). In addition, numerous tactical decisions can impact the firm’s technological base and advantage. Furthermore, successful innovation requires broad organizational learning, be it at the strategic level, in capital budgeting or when implementing new technology.

Financial support was kindly provided by the Fondazione Associazione di Storia sull’ Impresa (ASSI). Milan. Italy

We thank Alan Shapiro and David Teece for their helpful comments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allison, G. T. (1969) ‘Conceptual Models and the Cuban Missile Crisis’, American Political Science Review, 63:3, pp. 689–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison, G. T. (1971) Essence of Decisions: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis (Boston: Little, Brown).

    Google Scholar 

  • Amit, R. and Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993) ‘Strategic Asses and Organizational Rent’, Strategic Management Journal, 14, pp. 33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, K. R. (1971) The Concept of Corporate Strategy (Irwin: Homewood).

    Google Scholar 

  • Antle, R. and Eppen, G. D. (1985) ‘Capital Rationing and Organizational Slack in Capital Budgeting’, Management Science, 31:2, pp. 163–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. (1985) Strategy, Change and Defensive Routines (Marshfield MA: Pitman Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  • Armour, H. O. and Teece, D. J. (1978) ‘Organizational Structure and Economic Performance: A Test of the Multidivisional Hypothesis’, (Bell Journal of Economics, 9:1. pp. 106–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, W. R. (1956) Introduction to Cybernetics (New York: Wiley).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B. (1986) ‘Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy’, Management Science, 42, pp. 1231–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, S. (1980) ‘Nondissipative Signalling Structures and Dividend Policy’, Quarterly Journal of Economics

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, S. and Ritter, J. R. (1980) ‘Innovation and Communication: Signalling with Partial Disclosure’. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (November).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, J. L. (1971) Managing the Resource Allocation Process (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brealey, R. A. and Myers, S. C. (1988) Principles of Corporate Finance. 3rd edn (New York: McGraw-Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A. D. (1962) Strategy and Structure (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A. D. (1977) The Visible Hand (New York: McGraw-Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A. D. (1990) Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. D., March, J. G. and Olsen, J. P. (1972) ‘A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, pp. 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. and Kaplan, R. S. (1987) ‘How cost accounting systematically distorts product costs’, in W. J. Bruns and R. S. Kaplan (eds), Accounting and Management: Field Study Perspectives (Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, T. E. and Weston, J. F. (1983) Financial Theory and Corporate Policy, 2nd edn (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R. M. and March, J. G. (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • de Geus, A. P. (1988) ‘Planning As Learning’, Harvard Business Review (March–April), pp. 70–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dierickx, I. and K. Cool (1989) ‘Asset Stock Accumulation and Sustainability of Competitive Advantage’, Management Science, 35, pp. 1504–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, G. and Lorsch, J. (1983) Decision Making at the Top: The Shaping of Strategic Decision, (New York: Basic Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G. (1990) ‘Finance, Innovation and Industrial Change’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 13, pp. 299–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1967) Inside Bureaucracy (Boston, MA: Little, Brown).

    Google Scholar 

  • Einhorn, H. and Hogarth, R. (1986) ‘Decision Making under Ambiguity’, Journal of Business, 59:4, Part II, pp. S225–S250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellsberg, D. (1961) ‘Risk, Ambiguity and the Savage Axioms’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75, pp. 643–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F. and Jensen, M. C. (1983a) ‘Agency Problems and Residual Claims’. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, pp. 327–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F. and Jensen, M. C. (1983b) ‘Separation of Ownership and Control’, Journal of Law and Economics, 26, pp. 301–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F. and Miller, M. (1972) The Theory of Finance (New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, R. N. (1986) Innovation: The Attacker’s Advantage (New York: Summit Books).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. (1977) Organization Design (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Glazer, A. (1985) ‘The Advantages of Being First’, The American Economic Review (June), pp. 473–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, B. C., Kohn, M. and Stiglitz, J. E. (1990) ‘Financial Market Imperfections and Productivity Growth’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 13, pp. 321–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulliver, F. (1987) ‘Post-project Appraisals Pay’, Harvard Business Review (March–April) pp. 128–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, R. H. and Abernathy, W. (1988) ‘Managing our Way to Economic Decline’. Harvard Business Review (July–August).

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmstrom, B. (1989) ‘Agency Costs and Innovation’. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 12 pp. 305–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmstrom, B. (1979) ‘Moral Hazard and Observability’. Bell Journal of Economics, 10, pp. 74–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmstrom, B. (1982) ‘Managerial incentive problems — a dynamic perspective’, in Essays in Economics and Management in Honor of Lars Wahlbeck (Helsinki: Swedish School of Economics).

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmstrom, B. and Ricart-Costa, J. (1984) ‘Managerial Incentives and Capital Management’, Cowles Discussion Paper no. 729, November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmstrom, B. and Tirole, J. (1989) ‘The Theory of the Firm’, in Schmalensee and R. D. Willig (eds), Handbook of Industrial Organization, chap. 3 (Elsevier Science Publishers).

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I. (1982) Groupthink (Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, H. T., and R. S. Kaplan, Relevance Lost: The Rise and Fall of Management Accounting, Harvard Business School Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979) ‘Prospect Theory’, Econometrica, 47, pp. 263–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Slovic, P. and Tversky, A. (eds) (1982) Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (New York: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. S. (1985) ‘Accounting Lag: The Obsolescence of Cost Accounting Systems’ in K. B. Clark, R. H. Hayes and C. Lorenz (eds), The Uneasy Alliance: Managing the Productivity-Technology Dilemma (Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. S. (1986) ‘Must CIM be Justified by Faith Alone?’, Harvard Business Review (March–April).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. S. (1989) ‘Management Accounting for Advanced Technological Environments’, Science, 25 (August).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kets de Vries, M. F. R. and Miller, D. (1987) Unstable At the Top (New York: NAL Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakonishok and Shapiro (1986) ‘Systematic Risk, Total Risk and Size as Determinants of Stock Market Returns’, Journal of Banking and Finance, 10, pp. 115–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, S., Fischhoff, B. and Phillips, L. D. (1982) ‘Calibration of Probabilities: The State of the Art to 1980’, in D. Kahneman, P. Slovic and A. Tversky op. cit.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, M. B. and Montgomery, D. B. (1988) ‘First-Mover Advantages’, ‘Strategic Management Journal, 9, pp. 41–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, C. E. (1959) ‘The Science of Muddling Through’, Public Administration Review, 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machlup, F. (1967) ‘Theories of the Firm: Marginalist, Managerialist. Behavioral’, American Economic Review

    Google Scholar 

  • Marais, M. L. (1991) ‘Process-Oriented Activity-Based Costing’, Working Paper, University of Chicago, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1988) Decisions and Organizations (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, P., Barwise, P., Thomas, K. and Wensley, R. (1988) Managing Strategic Investment Decisions (London: London Business School).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, R. O. and Mitroff, I. I. (1981) Challenging Strategic Planning Assumptions (Chichester: Wiley-Interscience).

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. C. (1987) ‘A Simple Model of Capital Market Equilibrium with Incomplete Information’. Journal of Finance. 32, pp. 483–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, R. and Roberts, J. (1990) ‘The Economics of Modern Manufacturing: Technology, Strategy and Organization’, American Economic Review (June).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. and Vollman, T. (1985) ‘The Hidden Factory’, Harvard Business Review (September–October).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1990) ‘The Design School: Reconsidering the Basic Premises of Strategic Management’, Strategic Management Journal, 11:3 (March–April). pp. 171–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, G. R. and Hamilton, W. F. (1987) ‘Managing R&D as a Strategic Option’, Research Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, S. C. (1984) ‘Finance Theory and Financial Strategy’, in A. Hax (ed.). Readings on Strategic Management (Institute of Management Sciences).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. and S. Winter (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. and Wright, G. (1992) ‘The Rise and Fall of American Technological Leadership’. Journal of Economic Literature (December) pp. 1931–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, R. and Ross, L. (1980) Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E. T. (1958) The Theory of Growth of the Firm (New York: Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. (1981) Power in Organizations (Marshfield, MA: Pitman Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  • Polakoff, J. (1990) ‘Computer-Integrated Manufacturing: A New Look at Cost Justifications’. Journal of Accountancy (March).

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1980) Competitive Strategy (New York: The Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1985) Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance (New York: The Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pryor, T. E. (1989) quoted in Business Week, 6 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J. B. (1978) ‘Strategic Change: Logical Incrementalism’, Sloan Management Review, 20, pp. 7–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J. B. (1980) Strategies for Change: Logical Incrementalism (Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. (1983) ‘Dynamic Competitive Equilibria with Externalities, Increasing Returns, and Unbounded Growth’, PhD thesis, Department of Economics. University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. A. (1973) ‘The Economic Theory of Agency: The Principal’s Problem’. American Economic Review, 63, pp. 134–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. A. (1977) ‘The Determinants of Financial Structure: The Incentive Signalling Approach’, Bell Journal of Economics (Spring) pp. 23–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo, J. E., and Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1989) Decision Traps: Ten Barriers to Brilliant Decision Making and How To Overcome Them (New York: Doubleday).

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo, J. E. and Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1992) ‘Managing Overconfidence’, Sloan Management Review, 33:2 (Winter), pp. 7–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, W. and Zeckhauser, R. (1988) ‘Status Quo Bias in Decision Making’. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sappington, D. E. M. (1991) ‘Incentives in Principal-Agent Relationships’. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 5:2 (Spring), pp. 45–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnaars, S. P. (1989) Megamistakes: Forecasting and the Myth of Rapid Technological Change (New York: The Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1990) ‘Strategy. Complexity and Economic Rent’. Management Science. 36:10. pp. 1178–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993) ‘Strategic Decisions in Organizations’. Journal of Management Studies, 30:1. pp. 107–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoemaker, P. and Russo, J. E. (1993) ‘Frames of Mind’, Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. M. (1990) ‘The Leader’s New Work: Building Learning Organizations’, Sloan Management Review (Fall) pp. 7–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, A. C. and Titman, S. (1985) ‘An Integrated Approach to Corporate Risk Management’. Midland Corporate Finance Journal (Summer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1955) ‘A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, pp. 99–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1957) Administrative Behavior (New York: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. V. and Sullivan, C. (1990) ‘Survey of Cost Management Systems in Manufacturing’, Working paper, Purdue University, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R. M. (1970) Growth Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Staubus, G. J. (1988) ‘The Market Simulation Theory of Accounting Measurement’, Accounting and Business Research (Spring).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalk, G. (1988) ‘Time — The Next Source of Competitive Advantage’, Harvard Business Review (July–August) pp. 41–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, J. (1987) ‘Efficient Stock Prices, Inefficient Firms: A Signal-Jamming Model of Myopic Corporate Behavior’, Quarterly Journal of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinbrunner, J. D. (1974) The Cybernetic Theory of Decision (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe, A. L. (1968) Constructing Social Theories (Harcourt, Brace and World).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, M. J. (1988) ‘An Economic Perspective on Escalating Commitment’. Strategic Management Journal, 9, pp. 79–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R. H. (1980) ‘Towards a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1, pp. 39–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toffler, A. (1985) The Adaptive Corporation (McGraw-Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1974) ‘Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases’. Science, 185, pp. 1124–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1986) ‘Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions’, The Journal of Business, 59:II, pp. S251–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, H. E. (1991) ‘The Open Corporation’, California Management Review. 33:4. pp. 46–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1947) The Theory of Social and Economic Organization, Trans. A. M. Henderson and T. Parsons (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1969) The Social Psychology of Organizing (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfeit, B. (1984) ‘A Resource Based View of the Firm’. Strategic Management Journal. 5, pp. 171–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wildavsky, A. B. (1979) The Politics of the Budgetary Process. 3rd edn (Boston: Little, Brown).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1964) The Economics of Discretionary Behavior: Managerial Objectives in a Theory of the Firm (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1981) ‘The Modern Corporation: Origins. Evolution, Attributes’, Journal of Economic Literature. 19:4, pp. 1537–68.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1996 Associazione di Storia e Studi sull’Impressa

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schoemaker, P.J.H., Marais, M.L. (1996). Technological Innovation and Firm Inertia. In: Dosi, G., Malerba, F. (eds) Organization and Strategy in the Evolution of the Enterprise. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13389-5_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics