Skip to main content

Structure, Competence and Learning in an Adaptive Model of the Firm

  • Chapter
Organization and Strategy in the Evolution of the Enterprise

Abstract

Organizational learning [cf. for instance the pioneering work of Cyert and March (1963) and, for a broad outline of its main economic implications, Nelson and Winter (1982) is an issue which deserves primary attention when studying the dynamic performance of economic systems. But organizational learning — it will be argued in this chapter — cannot be adequately handled within the existing dominant analytical framework of economic theory. Recent attempts to accommodate organizational issues within the neoclassical theory of the firm have impressively broadened the scope of the latter and tackled fundamental questions which used to lie outside the concern of economic theory; but they have not been able to deal in a satisfactory way with the problem of learning because neoclassical theory, in these most recent developments, is concerned with information, whereas learning is about knowledge.

I would like to thank Giovanni Dosi, Keith Pavitt and Nick von Tunzelmann for constant advice and insightful comments. Useful remarks were also made by Massimo Egidi. Christian Knudsen, Ulrich Witt. The usual caveats apply.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aoki, M. (1986) ‘Horizontal vs. Vertical Information Structure of the Firm’, American Economic Review, 76, pp. 971–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoki, M. (1988) Information, Incentives and Bargaining in the Japanese Economy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Aoki, M. and Rosenberg N. (1989) ‘The Japanese Firm as an Innovating Institution’, in T. Shiraishi and Sh. Tsuru (eds), Economic Institutions in a Dynamic Society (London: MacMillan), pp. 137–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. (1974) The Limits of Organization (New York and London: W. W. Norton).

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. (1985) ‘Informational Structure of the Firm’, American Economic Review, 75. pp. 303–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, W. B. (1991) ‘Designing Economic Agents that Act like Human Agents: A Behavioral Approach to Bounded Rationality’, American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings. 81, pp. 353–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aumann, R. (1976) ‘Agreeing to Disagree’, Annals of Statistics, 4, pp. 1236–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvo, G. and Wellisz, S. (1978) ‘Supervision, Loss of Control, and the Optimal Size of the Firm’. Journal of Political Economy, 87. pp. 943–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A. D., Jr. (1962) Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of Industrial Enterprise (Cambridge MA. MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. H. and Marshall, C. R. (1981) ‘Definite Reference and Mutual Knowledge’, in A. K. Joshi, B. L. Webber and I. A. Sag (eds). Elements of Discourse Understanding (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 10–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. M. (1937) ‘The Nature of the Firm’. Economica, 4, pp. 386–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. and Jaffray J. Y. (1980) ‘Rational Behavior under Complete Ignorance’. Econometrica. 48, pp. 1281–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. D. (1984) ‘Conflict and Complexity: Goal Diversity and Organizational Search Effectiveness’, American Political Science Review, 78, pp. 435–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. D. (1987) ‘Adaptation of Organizational Routines’, Institute of Public Policy Studies, University of Michigan, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. D. (1991) ‘Individual Learning and Organizational Routine: Emerging Connections’, Organization Science, 2, pp. 135–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crémer, J. (1980) ‘A Partial Theory of Optimal Organization of a Bureaucracy’. Bell Journal of Economics, 11, pp. 683–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crémer, J. (1990) ‘Common Knowledge and the Co-Ordination of Economic Activities’, in M. Aoki, B. Gustafsson and O. E. Williamson (eds), The firm as a Nexus of Treaties (London: Sage Publications).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R. M. and March, J. G. (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G. (1991) ‘Information, Competencies and the Firm’, Conference on Fundamental Issues in Strategy: a Research Agenda for the 1990s, December 1990. Napa, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G. and Egidi, M. (1991) ‘Substantive and Procedural Uncertainty. An Exploration of Economic Behaviours in Complex and Changing Environments’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 1, pp. 145–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G. and Marengo, L. (1994) ‘Some Elements of an Evolutionary Theory of Organizational Competencies’, in R. W. England (ed.) Evolutionary Concepts in Contemporary Economics (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G., Teece, D. J. and Winter, S. G. (1991) ‘Toward a Theory of Corporate Coherence’, in G. Dosi, R. Giannetti and P. A. Toninelli (eds), Technology and the Enterprise in a Historical Perspective (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, D. and Prade, H. (1987) ‘Defense et Illustration des Approaches Non-Probabilistes de l’Imprecis et de l’Incertain’, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse. Rapport L.S.I. No. 269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, D. and Prade, H. (1988) ‘Modelling Uncertainty and Inductive Inference: A Survy of Recent Non-Additive Probability Systems’, Acta Psychologica. 68, pp. 53–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geanakoplos, J. (1990) ‘Game Theory without Partitions, and Applications to Speculation and Consensus’, Santa Fe Institute, Working Paper No. 90-018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, J. and Shortliffe, E. H. (1984) ‘A Method for Managing Evidential Reasoning in a Hierarchical Hypothesis Space’, Stanford University. Department of Computer Science, Report No. STAN-CS-84-1023.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, T. H. (1990) ‘The Agenda of the Firm: Structure and Incentive in Institutional Design’. Conference on Fundamental Issues in Strategy: a Research Agenda for the 1990s. December 1990, Napa, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, R. H. and Abernathy, W. J. (1980) ‘Managing Our Way to Economic Decline’. Harvard Business Review, 58: July–August, pp. 67–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiner, R. A. (1983) ‘The origin of predicatable behavior’. American Economic Review, 73, pp. 560–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeister, F. and Bäck M. (1991) ‘Genetic Algorithms and Evolution Strategies — Similarities and Differences’. Papers on Economics and Evolution No. 9103. edited by the European Study Group for Evolutionary Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. H. (1975) Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. H. (1986) ‘Escaping Brittleness: The Possibilities of General Purpose Learning Algorithms Applied to Parallel Rule-Based Systems’, in R. S. Michalski, J. G. Carbonell and T. M. Mitchell (eds), Machine Learning II (Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann), pp. 593–623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. H., Holyoak, K. J., Nisbett, R. E. and Thagard, P. R. (1986) Induction: Processes of Inference, Learning and Discovery (Cambridge MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagono, T., Nonaka, I., Sakakibara, K. and Okumura, A. (1985) Strategic vs. Evolutionary Management, A U.S.-Japan Comparison of Strategy and Organization (Amsterdam: North Holland).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lounamaa, P. H. and March, J. G. (1987) ‘Adaptive Coordination of A Learning Team’. Management Science, 33, pp. 107–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1988) ‘Variable Risk Preferences and Adaptive Aspirations’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 9, pp. 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1991) ‘Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning’, Organization Science, 2, pp. 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marengo, L. (1992) ‘Coordination and Organizational Learning in the Firm’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 2, pp. 313–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marengo, L. (1994) ‘Knowledge Distribution and Coordination in Organizations: On Some Social Aspects of the Exploitation vs. Exploration Trade-off’, Revue Internationale de Systémique, 7, pp. 553–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R and Winter, S. G. (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt, K. (1990b) ‘Some Foundations for a Theory of the Large Innovating Firm’. Brighton, SPRU, University of Sussex, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K. and Hamel, G. (1990) ‘The Core Competence of the Corporation’, Harvard Business Review, 68: May–June, pp. 79–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sah, R. K. and Stigliz, J. E. (1986) ‘The Architecture of Economic Systems: Hierarchies and Polyarchies’, American Economic Review. 76, pp. 716–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, G. (1976) A Mathemetical Theory of Evidence (Princeton: Pricenton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1976) ‘From Substantive to Procedural Rationality’, in S. J. Latsis (ed.). Method and Appraisal in Economics. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 129–48.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1979) ‘Rational Decision Making in Business Organizations’. American Economic Review, 69, pp. 493–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (1988) ‘Technological Change and the Nature of the Firm’, in G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelosn, G. Silverberg and L. Soete (eds). Technical Change and Economic Theory (London: Frances Pinter), pp. 256–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vardi, M. Y. (ed.) (1988) Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Knowledge (Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1975) Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications (New York: The Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms. Markets. Relational Contracting (London: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, S. G. (1982) ‘An Essay on the Theory of Production’, in H. Hymans (ed.). Economics and the World around It (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press), pp. 55–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, S. G. (1987) ‘Knowledge and Competence as Strategic Assets’, in D. J. Teece (ed.). The Competitive Challenge (Cambridge, MA: Ballinger), pp. 159–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, S. G. (1988) ‘On Coase, Competence and the Corporation’, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 4: 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. A. (1978) ‘Fuzzy Sets as a Basis for a Theory of Possibility’, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1, pp. 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1996 Associazione di Storia e Studi sull’Impressa

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Marengo, L. (1996). Structure, Competence and Learning in an Adaptive Model of the Firm. In: Dosi, G., Malerba, F. (eds) Organization and Strategy in the Evolution of the Enterprise. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13389-5_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics