Skip to main content

Logic and Inference

  • Chapter
Artificial Intelligence

Part of the book series: Macmillan Computer Science Series ((COMPSS))

  • 250 Accesses

Abstract

In the first half of this century, great strides were taken in the development of formal logic. Although largely motivated by puzzles in the philosophy of mathematics, the development of systems of formal logic in general, and of one such system in particular — the predicate calculus — revolutionized the study of inference. With its combination of expressive power and mathematical simplicity, the predicate calculus was unquestionably superior to the (basically) Aristotelian Logic which had gone before, and deduction in the predicate calculus came to be seen as a paradigm of rational inference. Moreover, where deduction seemed not to suffice as a model for inference — most notably, in the confirmation of scientific theories by empirical testing — the search began for an ‘inductive logic’ which was to be the equal of its deductive sibling in formality and rigour. (We shall have more to say about inductive logic in chapter 9.) Given the pre-eminence of the predicate calculus in providing a paradigm of rational inference, it was only to be expected that AI took the predicate calculus as its point of departure as a method for performing inference automatically. But, as we shall see, a surprise was lurking in the shadows.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Allen, J, J. Hendler, and A. Tate (eds.) Readings in Planning, San Mateo: Morgan Kaufmann, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boyer, Robert S. and J. Strother Moore A Computational Logic Handbook, Boston: Academic Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fodor, J. “Modules, Frames, Fridgeons, Sleeping Dogs, and the Music of the Spheres”, in Pylyshyn [8], pp. 139–149.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kirsh, David (ed.) Foundations of Artificial Intelligence, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  5. McCune, William “Otter 2.0 Users’ Guide”, Argonne National Laboratory report ANL-90/9, Argonne, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  6. McDermott, Drew “We’ve been framed: or, why AI is innocent of the frame problem”, in Pylyshyn [8], pp. 113–122.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Morgenstern, L. and L.A. Stein: “Why things go wrong: a formal theory of causal reasoning”, in Allen, Hendler and Tate [1], pp. 641–646.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pylyshyn, Z. (ed.) The Robots Dilemma: the frame problem in artificial intelligence, Norwood, N.J: Ablex, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shoham, Yoav Reasoning about Change, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1994 Ian Pratt

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pratt, I. (1994). Logic and Inference. In: Artificial Intelligence. Macmillan Computer Science Series. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13277-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13277-5_3

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-59755-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-13277-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics