Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Economic and Social History ((SESH))

  • 58 Accesses

Abstract

THIS survey has been arguing that medicine led a chequered existence in the ‘world we have lost’. Although the nation boasted a few great medical scientists — of whom William Harvey, discoverer of the circulation of the blood, and the astute clinician, Thomas Sydenham, are amongst the most eminent — the professional elite had more enemies than friends, and was accused of being monopolistic and self-serving without being able to offer correspondingly successful medical care. Neither the College of Physicians nor the Company of Surgeons did much for medical education or research (the Royal Society, chartered in 1662, was initially somewhat more energetic, staging the first experimental blood transfusions). Attempts by seventeenth-century Puritan reformers and by advocates of the new chemically-based drugs to change the structure of organised medical practice or to establish new theories and therapies met with resistance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1993 The Economic History Society

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Porter, R. (1993). Medicine in the Market Economy of the Georgian Age. In: Disease, Medicine and Society in England, 1550–1860. Studies in Economic and Social History. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13271-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13271-3_5

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-59717-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-13271-3

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics