Advertisement

The Real Contact Length in Grinding Based on Depth of Cut and Contact Deflections

  • W. B. Rowe
  • Q. I. Hongsheng
  • M. N. Morgan
  • Zheng Huanwen
Chapter

Abstract

Workpiece surface integrity is greatly affected by deflections within the grinding contact zone. A new relationship for the contact length between the grinding wheel and the surface of the workpiece is introduced based on contact mechanics. The model is based on the geometric contact length and also on the theory for cylinders in contact and the plastic deformation of the surface layer of the workpiece at the micro level of the grain contact. The new model suggests that the real contact length is typically 60% — 150% greater than the geometric contact length due to contact deflections, compared with 50% — 200% from measured values.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    R.H. Brown, K. Saito and M.C. Shaw, 1971, “Local Elastic Deflections in Grinding”, Annals of the CIRP, 19, 1, 105–113.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    K.V. Kumar and M.C. Shaw, 1981, “The Role of Wheel-Work Deflection in Grinding Operations”, Transactions of the ASME, Journal of Engineering for Industry, February, 103, 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kazuo Nakayama, 1967, “Elastic Deformation of Contact Zone in Grinding”, Bull. Japan Soc. of Prec. Eng’g., 5, 4, 93Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. Verkerk, 1975, “The Real Contact length in Cylindrical plunge Grinding”, Annals of the CIRP, 24, 1, 259–264.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    R.H. Brown, J.G. Wager and J.D. Watson, 1977, “An examination of the Wheel-Work interface using an Explosive Device to Suddenly interrupt the Surface Grinding Process”, Annals of the CIRP, 25, 1, 143–146.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    D.P. Saini, 1980, “Elastic Deflections in Grinding”, Annals of the CIRP, 29, 1, 189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    D.Y. Gu and J.G. Wager, 1988 “New Evidence on the Contact Zone in Grinding-Contact Length, Sliding and Cutting Regions”, Annals of the CIRP, 37, 1, 335–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Z.X. Zhou, C.A. van Lutterwelt, 1992, “The Real Contact Length between Grinding Wheel and Workpiece — A New Concept and a New measuring Method”, Annals of the CIRP 41, 1, 387–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    K.L. Johnson, 1985, “Contact Mechanics”, Cambridge University Press.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J.A. Greenwood and J.H. Tripp, 1967, “The Elastic Contact of Rough Spheres”, Journal of Applied Mechanics March, 153–159.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    D.Y. Gu and J.G. Wager, 1990, “Further Evidence on the Contact Zone in Surface Grinding”, Annals of the CIRP, 39, 1, 349–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    E. Saljé, R. Paulmann, 1988, “Relations Between Abrasive Processes”, Annals of the CIRP, 37, 2, 641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hideichi Makino, Tesuya Suto and Eiichi Fukushima, 1966, “An Experimental Investigation of the Grinding Process”, Journal of Mechanical Laboratory of Japan, 12, 1, 17.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. B. Rowe
    • 1
  • Q. I. Hongsheng
    • 2
  • M. N. Morgan
    • 1
  • Zheng Huanwen
    • 2
  1. 1.Liverpool John Moores UniversityUK
  2. 2.Northeast University of TechnologyChina

Personalised recommendations