Advertisement

Surface Roughness Model for end Milling Metal Matrix Composite (A1/SiC)

  • M. Alauddin
  • M. A. EL Baradie
  • M. S. J. Hashmi
Chapter

Summary

This paper describes a study of the development of surface roughness models for end milling Metal Matrix Composite (A1/15% Vf.SiC) using uncoated tungsten carbide inserts. The mathematical prediction models for surface roughness have been developed in terms of cutting speed, feed and axial depth of cut. The effect of these parameters on surface roughness have been investigated using response surface methodology (RSM). Response surface contours were constructed by a computer and used for determining the optimum cutting conditions for a required surface roughness.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    M.A. ELBESTAWI and R. SAGHERIAN (1991) Dynamic Modelling for the prediction of surface Error in the Milling of thin walled section, J. Materials Processing Technology 25, p. 215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    W.A. KLINE, R.A. DEVOR and I.A. SHAREEF (1982) The prediction of Surface geometry in End Milling, ASME J. Engng. Ind. 104, p. 272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    J. KACZMAREK (1976) Principles of Machining by cutting, abrasion and erosion, Peter Peregrinus Ltd., England.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    D.C. MONTGOMERY (1976) Design and Analysis of Experiment, John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    K.K. PADMANABHAN (1992) Prediction of Damping in Machined Joints, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manufact. 32, p. 305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    M.A.EL BARADIE (1990) Manufacturing aspects of Metal Matrix Composites, J. Materials Processing Technology 24, p. 261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    D. MONTGOMERY and Y. ALTINTAS (1991) Mechanism of Cutting forces and Surface generation in Dynamic Milling, ASME J. Engng. Ind. 113, p. 261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    E.J.A. ARMAREGO and R.H. BROWN (1967) The Machining of Metals, Prentice-Hall, Inc., New Jersey.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    B.L. JUNEJA and G.S. SEKHON (1987) Fundamentals of Metal cutting and Machine Tools, Wiley Eastern Ltd., New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    V.A. TIPNIS, S.C. BUESCHER and R.C. GARRISION (1976) Mathematically Modelled Machining data for adaptive control of End Milling, Proc. NAMRC-iv, p. 279.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    S.M. WU (1964) Tool Life Testing by Response Surface Methodology, Parts I & II, Trans. ASME 86, p. 105 & 111.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    S.A. JALALI and W.J. KOLARIK (1991) Tool Life and Machinability Models for Drilling Steels, Int. J. Mach. Tools. Manufact. 31, p. 231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Alauddin
    • 1
  • M. A. EL Baradie
    • 1
  • M. S. J. Hashmi
    • 1
  1. 1.Dublin City UniversityDublin 9Ireland

Personalised recommendations