Skip to main content
  • 35 Accesses

Abstract

Osteopathy was developed in 1874 by an American, Andrew Taylor Still (1828–1912). Still worked as a doctor in a small town in the mid-West of America, where he had become increasingly disenchanted with medicine and its ability to help patients. He himself watched three of his own children die from cerebrospinal meningitis. The idea of osteopathy grew from Still’s Christian faith, a sound practical knowledge of mechanics, and a history of inventing machinery. He saw the body as a machine made in God’s likeness and therefore perfect in design. Such a machine, he argued, could only become ill if it got out of adjustment. Restoration of normal function could be made via the muscles and joints. Ailments which seemingly had nothing to do with the spine — such as headaches, skin disorders and digestive disorders -were, in Still’s view, the result of the spinal column being out of position in some way. Therefore, he argued, manipulation of the spine that restored the proper alignment would successfully treat the condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Budd, C., B. Fisher, D. Parrinder & L. Price 1990. A model of cooperation between complementary and allopathic medicine in a primary care setting. British Journal of General Practice 40: 376–8.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A. 1984. Natural Health Handbook. Secaucus, New Jersey; Chartwell Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Consumers Association 1986. Magic or medicine? Which? Way to Health (October), 443–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Consumers Association 1993. Osteopathy. Which? Way To Health (October), 173–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giovanna, E. L. & S. Schiowitz 1991. An Osteopathic Approach to Diagnosis and Treatment. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: J. B. Lippincott.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, P. 1991. Cranial osteopathy. Nursing Times 87(22): 36–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • NAHAT 1993. Complementary Therapies in the NHS (Research Paper No. 10). London: National Association of Health Authorities and Trusts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potterton, D. 1978. Osteopathy could herald the end of orthopaedics. Therapy Weekly 5(17): 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandler, S. 1992. Osteopathy. London: Macdonald Optima.

    Google Scholar 

  • Still, A. T. 1897. Autobiography of A. T Still, reprinted 1977. Colorado Springs, Colorado: American Academy of Osteopathy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szmelskyj, A. O., & J. Morris 1992. An investigation of GPs’ attitudes to and knowledge of osteopathy. Complementary Medical Research 6(3): 119–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Times 1993. ‘Bottom Line’: Law to back the osteopath. The Times, 26 January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldman, P. 1993. Osteopathy — an aid to the healing process. Professional Nurse 8(7): 452–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1994 Joanna Trevelyan and Brian Booth

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Trevelyan, J., Booth, B. (1994). Osteopathy. In: Complementary Medicine. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13252-2_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13252-2_15

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-13254-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-13252-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics