Skip to main content

Brazil—Japan Relations: From Fever to Chill

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: St Antony’s/Macmillan Series ((STANTS))

Abstract

Brazil has traditionally dominated Japan’s relationships with Latin America. Brazil is home to the largest group of ethnic Japanese outside Japan itself. Half of Japan’s foreign investment in the region is located in Brazil.1 Brazil is Japan’s largest Latin American trading partner, providing crucial products like iron ore, steel, aluminum, and agricultural commodities. And Japanese banks have a large loan portfolio outstanding to the Brazilian central government and state corporations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Mitsuhiro Kagami, “Japanese Business Activities in Brazil” (Santiago: ECLAC, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  2. On the trading companies, see Terutomo Ozawa, Multinationalism, Japanese Style (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Leon Hollerman, Japan’s Economic Strategy in Brazil: Challenge for the United States (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  4. On the interest in independence from the United States, see Roberto Abdenur, O Marco Econômico e Global das Relaçõeses Brasil—Estados Unidos na Transição Democrcática (Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 1985). On Geisel’s stance, see Ministério das Relações Exteriores do Brasil, “Presidente Reafirma ao Congresso o Pragmatismo Responsável,” Resenha de Politiea Exterior do Brasil (1975) and Maria Regina Lima and Gerson Moura, “A Trajetória do Pragmatismo,” Revista Dados 25 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  5. According to Zysman, “Catch-up allows the government to identify both the importance of a sector and the appropriate technologies; the maps to the future are available in the industrial histories of one’s competitor.” See John Zysman, Governments, Markets and Growth: Financial Systems and the Politics of Industrial Change (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1983) p. 43. According to Cooper, “With the exception of France… the main criterion of other countries [for selecting the sector to be favored by the industrial policy] is to look at the economic evolution of the United States and identify as leading sectors those which seem to have been the cutting edge of the US economy. In recent years, such countries as Korea and Brazil now look increasingly to Japan for guidance on what sectors to emphasize.” See Richard Cooper, “Some Reflections on Industrial Policy for the United States,” paper prepared for the Conference Industrial Policy: Past, Present and Future, MITI, Tokyo, 1989, p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1993 Barbara Stallings and Gabriel Székely

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Torres, E.T. (1993). Brazil—Japan Relations: From Fever to Chill. In: Stallings, B., Székely, G. (eds) Japan, the United States, and Latin America. St Antony’s/Macmillan Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13128-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics