Abstract
If the critics were undecided as to how to classify Foucault’s work, they were also undecided as to what to make of its constant changeability. In this chapter and the ones that follow, Foucault’s work will be looked at as a constantly changing body of historical and philosophical reflection. At the same time, attention will be drawn to certain structural constants which give more cohesion to his work than would first appear to be the case. In order to emphasise different aspects of Foucault’s development, the analysis has been divided into four sections. The first two deal mainly with Foucault’s earlier work, beginning with the way Foucault orders his histories and his treatment of the ‘interior limits’ of a culture,1 and then going on to the more difficult question of the relation of the Same and the Other and limits in his work. The third section is concerned with Foucault’s later work, in which the exterior limits disappear, and in which his analyses of order and his ontological theses merge. The fourth section deals with his final writings, which reintroduce the question of the limits.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Foucault, ‘Truth and Power’, in Morris and Patton 1979, p.31; ‘Débat avec Michel Foucault’, 1980, p.43.
Foucault, ‘Deuxième entretien’, 1971, pp.191, 194; cf. ‘La situation de Cuvier’, 1970, p.86.
Foucault, ‘La Folie l’absence de l’oeuvre’, in HF (1972), pp.575, 581. This article was originally published in 1964.
See Foucault, ‘Les Déviations religieuses’, 1968, p.19.
Foucault, ‘Une Mobilisation culturelle’, 1977, p.49.
NC:89, xi, 197, 202. For similar notions, this time relating to the possibility of finding ‘isomorphisms’ (similarities of structure) between the texts of a given period, see Foucault, ‘Distance, aspect, origine’, 1963, pp.932–3.
MC:396–8, cf. p.339. For other comments on this contemporary rupture and the possible dawn of a new episteme see Foucault, ‘Entretien avec Madeleine Chapsal’, 1966, pp.14–15; ‘Foucault répond à Sartre’, 1968, p.20; ‘Deuxième entretien’, 1971, p.206; ‘L’Homme, est-il mort?’, 1966, pp.8–9; ‘La Naissance d’un monde’, 1969, p.viii; ‘Préface à la transgression’, 1963, p.761 and ‘Non au sexe roi’, 1977, p.124.
Foucault, ‘Réponse à une question’, 1968, p.855.
Foucault, ‘Deuxième entretien’ 1971, p.194.
Foucault, ‘Monstrosities in Criticism’, 1971, pp.57–60. ‘Steiner responds to Foucault’, Diacritics 1 (Winter 1971), p.59.
Foucault, ‘La Situation de Cuvier’, 1970, p.86.
Foucault, ‘Truth and Power’, in Morris and Patton, 1979, p.32.
AS:14–15; see also Foucault, ‘Réponse à une question’, 1968, p.860 and ‘Deuxième entretien’, 1971, p.191; Jacques Le Goff recommends this idea of the ‘document/monument’ to other historians 1978, p.238.
Foucault, ‘Débat avec Michel Foucault’, 1980, p.34.
Foucault, ‘Le Retour de la morale’, 1984, p.41; cf. UP:11–12, 16.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1989 Clare O’Farrell
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
O’Farrell, C. (1989). Discontinuity and Order. In: Foucault. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13106-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13106-8_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-58664-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-13106-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)