Abstract
The contention of this chapter is that, despite the multiplicity of modern Christologies, the only genuine choice for those whose understanding and service of God is supremely influenced by the life and teaching of Jesus is between traditional orthodoxy and unitarianism. To many if not most readers this may appear an outrageous oversimplification of the issue, but I believe there are cogent reasons for restricting the real options to these two, in effect, narrowing the debate to the credibility or otherwise of incarnation in what has variously been termed its literal, metaphysical, essential or ontological meaning, namely, that God, or more accurately a mode of God, the divine ‘Word’ or ‘Logos’, actually became flesh, became man; the startling implication of this belief being, as Ian Wilson put it, that ‘a man who to all appearances was merely an obscure Jewish teacher of two thousand years ago, has in fact been co-creator and coruler of our multimillion galaxy universe throughout its entire existence’.1
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Ian Wilson, Jesus the Evidence (Pan Books 1985) p. 11.
Brian Hebblethwaite, The Incarnation: Collected Essays in Christology (Cambridge University Press 1987) pp. 1f.
G. W. H. Lampe, God as Spirit (Oxford University Press 1977) p. 23.
John Hick, ‘Is There a Doctrine of the Incarnation?’ in Michael Goulder (ed.), Incarnation and Myth: The Debate Continued (SCM Press 1979) p. 48.
John Hick (ed.), The Myth of God Incarnate (SCM Press 1977) p. ix.
Quoted in New Essays in Philosophical Theology, ed. by Antony Flew and Alasdair MacIntyre (SCM Press 1963) p. 268n.
James Mackey, Jesus the Mann and the Myth (SCM Press 1979) p. 233.
Quoted by Daniel E. Bassuk, Incarnation in Hinduism and Christianity (Macmillan 1987) p. 195.
John A. T. Robinson, Honest to God (SCM Press 1963) p. 74.
Norman Pittenger, Christology Reconsidered (SCM Press 1970) p. 2, quoting from his earlier book Christ and Christian Faith (1941) p. 45.
John Knox, The Death of Christ (1958) (Fontana Books 1967) p. 105.
John A. T. Robinson, The Human Face of God (SCM Press 1973) pp. 184f.
Lampe, op. cit., p. 17; Robinson, The Human Face of God; Anthony Hanson, The Image of the Invisible God (SCM Press 1982);
David Welbourn, God-Dimensional Man (Epworth Press 1972);
Edward Schillebeeckx, Jesus (Fount Paperbacks 1983) p. 626.
A. R. Peacocke, Creation and the World of Science (Clarendon Press 1979) Chapter 5, especially pp. 240f.
A. T. Hanson and R. P. C. Hanson, Reasonable Belief A Survey of the Christian Faith (Oxford University Press (1980) 1983) p. 106.
Colin Brown, Miracles and the Critical Mind (Paternoster Press 1984) P. 298.
Maurice Wiles, The Making of Christian Doctrine (Cambridge University Press 1967) p. 173.
John Macquarrie, Jesus Christ in Modern Thought (SCM Press and Trinity Press International 1990) p. 374.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1993 A. Richard Kingston
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kingston, A.R. (1993). The Narrow Choice. In: God in One Person. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13098-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13098-6_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-13100-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-13098-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)