Skip to main content

Community Law and the Legal Systems of the Member States

  • Chapter
Book cover European Community Law

Part of the book series: Macmillan Professional Masters ((PAPRMA))

  • 11 Accesses

Abstract

The problem we shall consider in this chapter is how the evolving Community legal order has established itself as a superior legal order operating within, but nonetheless independent of the national legal systems. It demonstrates how the Court of Justice has used the organic connection offered by Article 177 EC both to assert its own ability to give authoritative interpretations of the meaning and effect of Community law, and to emphasise that where Community law applies, national courts themselves must act as ‘Community courts’, interpreting and applying Community law subject to the authority of the Court.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Further Reading

  • Barav (1989) ‘Enforcement of Community rights in the National Courts: the Case for a Jurisdiction to grant interim relief’, 26 Common Market Law Review, 369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtin (1990a) ‘The Province of Government: Delimiting the Direct Effect of Directives in the Common Law Context’, 15 European Law Review, 195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtin (1990b) ‘Directives: The Effectiveness of Judicial Protection of Individual Rights’, 27 Common Market Law Review, 709.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Burca (1992) ‘Giving Effect to European Community Directives’, 55 Modern Law Review, 215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Docksey and Fitzpatrick (1991) ‘The Duty of National Courts to Interpret Provisions of National Law in Accordance with Community Law’, 20 Industrial Law Journal, 113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick (1989) ‘The Significance of EEC Directives in UK sex discrimination law’. 9 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gravells (1989) ‘Disapplying an Act of Parliament pending a Preliminary Ruling: Constitutional Enormity or Community Law Right?’, Public Law. 568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gravells (1991) ‘Effective Protection of Community Law Rights: Temporary Dispplication of an Act of Parliament’, Public Law, 180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead (1991) ‘The obligation to apply European law: is Duke dead?’, 16 European Law Review, 490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pescatore (1983) ‘The Doctrine of ‘Direct Effect’: An Infant Disease of Community Law’, 8 European Law Review, 155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prechal (1990) ‘Remedies after Marshall’, 27 Common Market Law Review, 451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross (1993) ‘Beyond Francovich’. 56 Modern Law Review, 55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder (1993) ‘The Effectiveness of European Community Law: Institutions, Processes, Tools and Techniques’, 56 Modern Law Review, 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szyszczak (1990a) ‘Sovereignty: Crisis, Compliance, Confusion, Complacency’, 15 European Law Review. 480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szyszczak (1992a) ‘European Community Law: New Remedies, New Directions?’, 55 Modern Law Review, 690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt (1982) ‘New Legal Order or Old?’, 7 European Law Review, 147.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1993 Josephine Shaw

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shaw, J. (1993). Community Law and the Legal Systems of the Member States. In: European Community Law. Macmillan Professional Masters. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13078-8_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics