Image Acquisition

  • G. J. Awcock
  • R. Thomas
Part of the Macmillan New Electronics Series book series


The general aim of the image acquisition sub-system can be summarised as:

‘The transformation of optical image data into an array of numerical data which may be manipulated by a computer, so the overall aim of machine vision may be achieved’.

In order to achieve this aim three major issues must be tackled — these are representation, transduction (or sensing) and digitisation.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    D. Young, ‘Representing images for computer vision’, AISB Quarterly Newsletter, 63, pp. 8–11, University of Sussex, 1987.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. Wilson and R. Hodgson, ‘A pattern recognition system based on models of the human visual system’, In Proc. IPA ‘92, pp. 258–261, Maastricht, Netherlands, IEE, 1992.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    L. J. Pinson, ‘Robot vision: an evaluation of imaging sensors’, in A. Pugh (Ed.), Robot Sensors: Vol. 1 — Vision, pp. 15–63, IFS (Publications), Bedford, 1986.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. Wilson and J. Hawkes, Optoelectronics: An Introduction, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1983.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    B. Batchelor, D. Hill and D. Hodgson, Automated Visual Inspection, IFS (Publications), Bedford, 1985.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    I. McLean, Electronic and Computer-Aided Astronomy, Ellis Horwood, Chichester, 1989.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. R. Nicholls and M. H. Lee, ‘A survey of robot tactile sensing technology’, Int. J. Rob. Res., 8(3), pp. 3–30, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    G. P. Weckler, ‘Operation of p–n junction photodetectors in a photon flux integrating mode’, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, SC-2 (3), pp. 65–73, Sept. 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Technical brief: ‘Electrons vs. voltages’, CCD Solid State Imaging Technology Data Book, p. 354, Loral Fairchild, Milpitas, California, 1991.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Hollingum, Machine Vision: The Eyes of Automation, pp. 94–98, IFS (Publications), Bedford, 1984.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. R. Ruocco, Robot Sensors and Transducers, Chapter 3, Open University Press, Milton Keynes, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    G. F. Amelio, ‘Charge-coupled devices’, Scientific American, 230, pp. 22–31, Feb. 1974.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    K. Miwada et al., ‘Third generation CCD linear sensor’, ESSCIRC ’85, pp. 346–358, Toulouse, France, IEEE, New York, 1985.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    D. Koenig, ‘The boards are back in town: board survey’, Image Processing, 3(3), pp. 18–36, July/August 1991.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    P. Atkin, ‘Better boards by design: boards survey’, Image Processing, 4(2), pp. 31–45, May/June 1992Google Scholar

Copyright information

© G.J. Awcock and R. Thomas 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. J. Awcock
    • 1
  • R. Thomas
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Electrical and Electronic EngineeringUniversity of BrightonUK

Personalised recommendations