Abstract
According to a story current in the seventeenth century, Henry IV was never certain of his title to the crown, ‘With what right I got it,’ he was supposed to have said, ‘God only knows.’1 The antiquary Sir Roger Twysden, repeating the story in the middle of the century and at a remove of over three hundred years from the actual event, claimed no better understanding. Of the first Lancastrian’s right to the throne, Twysden confessed, ‘ I will say nothing, but that his sonne and grandchild were reputed kings.’2 The story, if apocryphal, was none the less instructive. To the Stuart political nation it underscored the dangerous failure of consensus on a question of fundamental importance: by what right did the monarch, any monarch, occupy the throne?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1995 Howard Nenner
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nenner, H. (1995). Introduction: The Succession in History and Theory. In: The Right to be King. Studies in Modern History. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-12952-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-12952-2_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-12954-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-12952-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)