Skip to main content

Collusive Behaviour, R&D, and European Policy

  • Chapter
Oligopoly and Dynamic Competition

Part of the book series: Central Issues in Contemporary Economic Theory and Policy ((CICETP))

  • 33 Accesses

Abstract

Over the past few years, the traditional view that market structure largely determines the conduct (or behaviour) of firms in a market, and industry structure determines industry performance, has lost ground. The New Industrial Organization literature insists on the central role of market conduct, the necessity of detailed analysis of business behaviour and the usefulness of well-defined microeconomic models to understand the complex relationships characterizing the structure-conduct-performance paradigm (1). Given the dynamic nature of strategic competition, each firm knows that, over time, its behaviour can have an effect upon the other firms and that its best plan of action depends upon the plans chosen by its rivals. Firms must then be conceived as actors able to modify to some extent their environment instead of being subject to it. In this perspective the configuration of industrial structures and organizational forms is as much the outcome of deliberate strategies as it is of initial conditions and predetermined rules of the game (2).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Abreu D.: «Infinitely Repeated Games with Discounting General Theory», Harvard Institute of Economic Research, Discussion Paper, n. 1083, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aumann R.Sown B.: Cooperation and Bounded Rationality, mimeo, Aug. 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alrond R.: The Evolution of Cooperation, New York, Basic Books, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berg S.Duncan J.Friedman Ph.: Joint Venture, Strategies and Corporate Innovation, Cambridge (Mass.), Oelgeschlager, Gunn and Hain, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bork R.: «The Goals of Antitrust Policy», American Economic Review, May 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brock W.Scheinkman J.: «Price Setting Supergames with Capacity Constraint», Review of Economic Studies, n. 52, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Clarke R.: «Collusion and the Incentives for Information Sharing», Bell Journal of Economics, n. 14, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dasgupta P.Stigutz J.: «Industrial Structure and the Nature of Innovative Activity», Economic Journal, n. 90, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  9. d’Aspremont Cl. — Jacquemin A.: «Cooperative and Non-Cooperative R&D in Duopoly», American Economic Review, December 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  10. d’Aspremont Cl. — Jacquemin A.Jaskold-Gabszewicz J.Weymark J.: «On the Stability of Collusive Price Leadership», Canadian Journal of Economics, n. 16, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Donsimoni M.P.: «Stable Heterogeneous Cartels», International Journal of Industrial Organization, n. 4, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Donsimoni M.P.Economides N.Polemarchakis H.: «Stable Cartels», International Economic Review, n. 27, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ergas H.: «Does Technology Policy Matter?», CEPS Papers, n. 29, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Flaherty M.T.: Business and Technology History of Silicon Wafers for Integrated Circuits, mimeo, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Forrester I.Norrall Ch.: «The Laicization of Community Law — Self Help and the Rule of Reason: How Competition Law Is and Could Be Applied», Common Market Law Review, March 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fox E.: «The Politics of Law and Economics in Judicial Decision Making: Antitrust as a Wisdom», New York University, Law Review, n. 4, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gilbert F.Newbery D.: «Preemptive Patenting and the Persistence of Monopoly», American Economic Review, June 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hilferding R.: Das Finanzkapital, Vienne, 1910, French trans, by Oluver M Le capital financier, Paris, de Minuit, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Katz M.: «An Analysis of Cooperative Research and Development», Rand Journal of Economics, Winter 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jacquemin A.: «The Criterion of Economic Performance in the Antitrust Policies of the United States and the EEC», Common Market Law Review, April 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jacquemin A.: New Industrial Organization, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press and London, Oxford University Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jacquemin A. lammerant M.Spinoit B.: «Competition Européenne et Coopération en Matière de Recherche — Développement. Commission des Communautés Européennes, Evolution de la Concentration et de la Concurrence», Collezione, Document de Travail, n. 80, pp. IV-761, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jacquemin A.Slade M.: «Cartels, Collusion and Horizontal Mergers», in Schmalensee R.Willing R. (editors): Handbook of Industrial Organization, Amsterdam, North-Holland, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kaufman P.: Passing off and Misappropriation, An Economic and Legal Analysis of the Law of Unfair Competition, Munich, Max Planck Institute, CVH, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  25. MacLeod B.Norman G.Thisse J.: «Competition, Tacit Collusion and Free Entry», The Economic Journal, n. 97, March 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mestmacker E.: «Competition Policy and Antitrust. Some Comparative Observations», Zeitschrift fur die gesamte Staatwissenschaft, n. 3, September 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ordover J.Willing R.: «Antitrust for High-Technology Industries. Assessing Research Joint Venture and Mergers», Journal of Law and Economics, n. 2, May 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Osborne D.: «Cartel Problems», American Economic Review, n. 66, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Perry M.: «Scale Economies, Imperfect Competition and Public Policy», Journal of Industrial Economics, n. 32, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Reinganum J.: «Uncertain Innovation and the Persistence of Monopoly», American Economic Review, September 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rothschild R.: «Market Price and the Stability of Cartels», Economics Letters, n. 15, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Selten P.: «Are Cartel Laws Bad for Business?», in Hauptmann H.Krelle W.Mosler K.C. (editors): Operations Research and Economic Theory, Berlin, Springer Verlag, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Shapiro C.: «Theories of Oligopoly Behavior», in Schmalensee R.Willig R. (a cura di): Handboolk of Industrial Organization, Amsterdam, North-Holland, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Spence M.: «Cost Reduction, Competition and Industry Performance», Econometrica, n. 52, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Stiglitz J.Matthewson F. (a cura di): New Development in the Analysis of Market Structure, London, MIT press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Vives X.: «Duopoly Information Equilibrium. Cournot and Bertrand», Journal of Economic Theory, n. 34, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Von Hippel E.: «Appropriability of Innovation Benefits as a Predictor of the Source of Innovation», Research Policy, n. 2, April 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Weiszäcker C.: Barriers to Entry, Berlin, Springer Verlag, 1980.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  39. Waterson M.: Economic Theory of the Industry, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Williamson O.: «Economies as an Antitrust Defence: The Welfare Tradeoffs», American Economic Review, n. 58, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Williamson O.: «Economies as an Antitrust Defence Revisited», in Jacquemin A.De Jong H. (eds.): Welfare Aspects of Industrial Markets, Leiden, Nijkoff, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1992 SIPI Srl, Rivista di Politica Economica

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jacquemin, A. (1992). Collusive Behaviour, R&D, and European Policy. In: Baldassarri, M. (eds) Oligopoly and Dynamic Competition. Central Issues in Contemporary Economic Theory and Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-12818-1_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics