Skip to main content

The Impact of Steel upon the Greater New York-Philadelphia Industrial Region

  • Chapter
Book cover General Equilibrium Economics
  • 89 Accesses

Abstract

For a long time the inadequacy of the traditional Weberian agglomeration analysis1 has been fully recognized. Palander, in particular, has pointed up its shortcomings.2 More recently, a fresh and more general approach has been made by P. Sargant Florence and others.3 This approach, primarily an attempt to identify from processed census data meaningful geographical associations in industry, of necessity does not concern itself with the development of a theoretical framework.4

This work was co-authored with Walter Isard and was published originally in the Review of Economics and Statistics, 35 (1953), pp. 289–301. It is reproduced with permission of Elsevier Science Publishers.

The study was done partly under the auspices of the Social Science Research Center, the University of Puerto Rico, and of the Center of Urban and Regional Studies, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The basic projections were completed in February 1952 for investment use by the firm of Minot, De Blois and Maddison, who generously financed the work in the initial stage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Iron and Steel Institute, Annual Reports, various years.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barfod, Børge, Local Economic Effects of a Large-Scale Industrial Undertaking, Copenhagen (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cumberland, J., The Locational Structure of the East Coast Steel Industry with Emphasis on an Integrated New England Steel Mill, PhD Dissertation, Harvard University (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Daly, M. C., ‘An Approximation to a Geographical Multiplier’, Economic Journal, 50 (1940), pp. 248–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Engländer, O., ‘Kritisches und Positives zu einer allgemeinen reinen Lehre von Standort’, Zeitschrift für Volkswirtschaft und Sozialpolitik, Neue Folge, 5 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Evans, W. D., and M. Hoffenberg, ‘The Interindustry Relations Study for 1947’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 34 (1952) pp 97–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, ‘The Employment Multiplier in Wichita’. Monthly Review, 37 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Florence, P. S. Investment, Location and Size of Plant, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (1948).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Friedrich, C. J., trans., Alfred Weber’s Theory of Location of Industries, University of Chicago (1929)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hoover, E. M., Jr., Location Theory and the Shoe and Leather Industries, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. (1937).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Isard, W., ‘Some Locational Factors in the Iron and Steel Industry Since the Early Nineteenth Century’, Journal of Political Economy, 56 (1948), pp. 203–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Isard, W., et al., ‘Input-Output Analysis: Discussion’, Papers and Proceedings of the American Economic Association, 39 (1949), pp. 226–40.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Isard, W., and W. Capron, ‘The Future Locational Pattern of Iron and Steel Production in the United States’, Journal of Political Economy, 57 (1949) pp 118–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Isard, W., and J. Cumberland, ‘New England as a Possible Location for an Integrated Iron and Steel Works’, Economic Geography, 26 (1950), pp. 245–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Isard, W., ‘Interregional and Regional Input-Output Analysis: A Model of a Space-Economy’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 33 (1951), pp. 318–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Isard, W., and M. J. Peck, ‘Location Theory and International and Interregional Trade Theory’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 67 (1953) pp. 97–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Isard, W., ‘Some Empirical Results and Problems of Regional Input— Output Analysis’, ch. 5 in W. Leontief, Studies in the Structure of the American Economy, New York (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Joelson, W. K., ‘Suggestions for a Planned Industrial Promotion Program’, Economic Development Administration, San Juan, PR, 1 October 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Johnson, O., Steel Consumption in 1948: A Report by Iron Age to the Metalworking Industry (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Krutilla, J., The Structure of Costs and Regional Advantage in Primary Aluminum Production, PhD dissertation, Harvard University (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kuenne, Robert. E., The Use of Input-Output Techniques for the Estimation of Employment in the Delaware Valley, PhD dissertation, Harvard University (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Leontief, W., The Structure of American Economy, 1919–1929, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. (1941).

    Google Scholar 

  23. National Resources Planning Board, Industrial Location and National Resources. US Government Printing Office. Washington, DC (1943).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Niederhauser, E., ‘Die Standortstheorie Alfred Webers’, Staatswirtschaftliche Studien, 14 (1944), pp. 181–7.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Palander, T., Beiträge zur Standortstheorie, Almqvist, Uppsala (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pennsylvania State Planning Commission, Boom in Bucks County, mimeographed undated

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ullman, E., ‘The Basic-Service Ratio and the Areal Support of Cities’, mimeographed, undated.

    Google Scholar 

  28. US Army, Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors, Commercial Statistics: Waterborne Commerce, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, various years.

    Google Scholar 

  29. US Army, Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors, Annual Reports (1947, 1948) US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  30. US Bureau of the Census, Census of Manufactures, 1947, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  31. US Bureau of the Census, Census of Business, 1948, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  32. US Bureau of the Census, Census of Population, 1950, US Government Printing Office Washington, DC (1952–7).

    Google Scholar 

  33. US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Survey of Current Business, July 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  34. US Department of Commerce, Minerals Yearbook, 1947, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  35. US Department of Labor, Monthly Labor Review, various issues.

    Google Scholar 

  36. US Steel Company, Statement at Public Hearing by US Army Engineers, March 14, 1951, Trenton, NJ, mimeographed.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1992 Robert E. Kuenne

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kuenne, R.E. (1992). The Impact of Steel upon the Greater New York-Philadelphia Industrial Region. In: General Equilibrium Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-12752-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics