Linguistic rhythm and speech segmentation

  • A. Cutler
Part of the Wenner-Gren Center International Symposium Series book series


Speech is rhythmic. But this simple statement has many interesting corollaries, among them two which are central to this paper: firstly, rhythmic structures differ across languages, and secondly, rhythm in language is more than just timing.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abercrombie, D. (1967). Elements of General Phonetics, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  2. Bertinetto, P.M. & Fowler, C.A. (1989). On sensitivity to durational modifications in Italian and English. Rivista di Linguistica, 1, 69–94.Google Scholar
  3. Bolinger, D.L. (1965). Pitch accent and sentence rhythm. In Forms of English: Accent, Morpheme, Order Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, G.D.A. (1984). A frequency count of 190,000 words in the London-Lund Corpus of English Conversation. Beh. Res. Meth., Instr. & Comp., 16, 502–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Butterfield, S. and Cutler, A. (1988). Segmentation errors by human listeners: Evidence for a prosodic segmentation strategy. Proc. SPEECH 88 (Seventh symposium of the Federation of Acoustic Societies of Europe), Edinburgh; 827–833.Google Scholar
  6. Buxton, H. (1983). Temporal predictability in the perception of English speech. In Cutler, A. and Ladd, D.R. (eds.), Prosody: Models and Measurements, Springer, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  7. Classe, A. (1939). The Rhythm of English Prose, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  8. Cutler, A. & Carter, D.M. (1987). The predominance of strong initial syllables in the English vocabulary. Comp. Sp. Lang., 2, 133–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cutler, A., Mehler, J., Norris, D. & Segui, J. (1986). The syllable’s differing role in the segmentation of French and English. J. Mem. Lang., 25, 385–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cutler, A. & Norris, D. (1988). The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access. J. Exp. Psy.: Hum. Perc. Pelf., 14, 113–121.Google Scholar
  11. Darwin, C.J. (1975). On the dynamic use of prosody in speech perception. In Cohen, A. and Nooteboom, S.G. (eds.), Structure and Process in Speech Perception, Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
  12. Dauer, R.M. (1983). Stress-timing and syllable-timing reanalyzed. J. Phon., 11, 51–62.Google Scholar
  13. Dauer, R.M. (1987). Phonetic and phonological components of language rhythm. Proc. 11th Int. Cong. Phon. Sci., Tallinn; Vol. 5, 447–450.Google Scholar
  14. Delattre, P. (1966). A comparison of syllable length conditioning among languages. Int. Rev. App!. Ling., 4, 183–198.Google Scholar
  15. Faure, G., Hirst, D.J. & Chafcouloff, M. (1980). Rhythm in English: Isochronism, pitch and perceived stress. In Waugh, L.R. and van Schooneveld, C.H. (eds.), The Melody of Language, University Park Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  16. Fear, B. (1990). Perceptual and Phonetic Distinctions of Syllabic Categories. MPhil Dissertation, Cambridge University.Google Scholar
  17. Hoequist, C.E. (1983). Syllable duration in stress-, syllable- and mora-timed languages. Phonetica, 40, 203–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lehiste, I. (1973). Rhythmic units and syntactic units in production and perception. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 54, 1228–1234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Martin, J.G. (1979). Rhythmic and segmental perception are not independent. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 65, 1286–1297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mehler, J. (1981). The role of syllables in speech processing. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., B295, 333–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mehler, J., Dommergues, J.-Y., Frauenfelder, U. & Segui, J. (1981). The syllable’s role in speech segmentation. J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Beh., 20, 298–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Meltzer, R.H., Martin, J.G., Mills, C.B., Imhoff, D.L. and Zohar, D. (1976). Reaction time to temporally displaced phoneme targets in continuous speech. J. Exp. Psy.: Hum. Perc. Perf., 2, 277–290.Google Scholar
  23. Mens, L. and Povel, D. (1986). Evidence against a predictive role for rhythm in speech perception. Quart. J. Exp. Psy., 38A, 177–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nakatani, L.H., O’Connor, K.D. & Aston, C.H. (1981). Prosodic aspects of American English speech rhythm. Phonetica, 38, 84–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. O’Connor, J.D. (1965). The perception of time intervals. University College Phonetics Laboratory Progress Report, 2, 11–15.Google Scholar
  26. Pike, K.L. (1945). The Intonation of American English, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  27. Roach, P. (1983). On the distinction between “stress-timed” and “syllable-timed” languages. In Crystal, D. (ed.), Linguistic Controversies, Arnold, London.Google Scholar
  28. Segui, J. (1984). The syllable: A basic perceptual unit in speech processing. In Bouma, H. and Bouwhuis, D.G. (eds.), Attention and Performance X, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J.Google Scholar
  29. Segui, J., Frauenfelder, U. & Mehler, J. (1981). Phoneme monitoring, syllable monitoring and lexical access. Brit. J. Psy., 72, 471–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Svartvik, J. & Quirk, R. (1980). A Corpus of English Conversation, Gleerup, Lund.Google Scholar
  31. Uldall, E.T. (1971). Isochronous stresses in RP. In Hammerich, L.L., Jakobson, R. and Zwimer, E. (eds.), Form and Substance: Akademisk Forlag, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  32. Wenk, B.J. & Wioland, F. (1982). Is French really syllable-timed? J. Phon., 10, 193–216.Google Scholar
  33. Wingfield, A. and Klein, J.F. (1971). Syntactic structure and acoustic pattern in speech perception. Perc. Psychophys., 9, 23–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Wenner-Gren Center 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Cutler

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations