Skip to main content

Defining Teleological Mysticism

  • Chapter
Evil and the Mystics’ God

Part of the book series: Library of Philosophy and Religion ((LPR))

  • 69 Accesses

Abstract

Mysticism is a nebulous concept; defining it is difficult and in many respects an ongoing affair.1 The problem can begin to be seen in its great scope of application. For instance, mysticism has been distinguished in terms of religious, non-religious, moral and amoral types. Although mysticism is traditionally associated with religion, the term has become something of a catch-all word that is used (and misused) to denote all manner of esoteric or exceptional experiences. Indeed, mysticism is often associated with artistic genius and aesthetic experience, even in cases where these are seemingly disconnected from formal religious themes and mediums, and it has been aligned with clearly immoral and anti-religious characters and practices.2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Perhaps the most notable of recent time are R. C. Zaehner’s panenhenic, monistic and theistic ranking in Zaehner, Mysticism Sacred and Profane (Oxford University Press, 1957)

    Google Scholar 

  2. W. T. Stace’s introvertive-extrovertive distinction in Stace, Mysticism and Philosophy (Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1960); and

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ninian Smart’s numinous-mystical logical strand model, in Smart, Reasons and Faiths (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1958)

    Google Scholar 

  4. James Horne, The Moral Mystic (Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 1983), and

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zaehner, Our Savage God (New York: Sheed & Ward, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Evelyn Underhill, Mysticism (New York: New American Library, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  7. See ‘The Conservative Character of Mysticism’, in Steven Katz (ed.), Mysticism and Religious Traditions (Oxford University Press, 1983); and

    Google Scholar 

  8. ‘Language, Epistemology, and Mysticism’, in Steven Katz (ed.), Mysticism and Philosophical Analysis (London: Sheldon Press, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Also, Donald Evans questions the epistemological assumptions Katz brings to his thesis in ‘Can Philosophers Limit What Mystics Can Do?’, Religious Studies, vol. XXV (1989) no. 3, pp. 53–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Henry Suso, The Life of the Servant, James M. Clark (tr.) (London: James Clark, 1952) p. 55.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Anonymous, Meditations on the Tarot: A Journey Into Christian Hermeticism, Robert A. Powell (tr.) (Warwick, NY: Amity House Inc., 1985) p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Donald Evans, ‘Christian Spirituality and Social Action’, in Stanley Fefferman (ed.), Awakened Heart: Buddhist-Christian Dialogue in Canada (Toronto: United Church House, 1985) p. 122.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nicolas Berdyaev, The Destiny of Man, Nataliia Duddington (tr.) (London: G. Bles, 1937) pp. 25, 34.

    Google Scholar 

  14. See Smart, ‘Interpretation and Mystical Experience’, Religious Studies vol. I (1965) no. 1, pp. 75–87 where Smart argues against Zaehner in this regard.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Louis Dupré, ‘The Christian Experience of Mystical Union’, The Journal of Religion, vol. LXIX (January 1989) no. 1, p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1992 Michael Stoeber

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stoeber, M. (1992). Defining Teleological Mysticism. In: Evil and the Mystics’ God. Library of Philosophy and Religion. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-12653-8_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics