The Strategic Embargo: Western Economic Defense

  • Peter van Ham

Abstract

On the turn of this century Russia’s Minister of Finance, Count Witte, wrote a memorandum to Tsar Nicholas II, debating the usefulness of foreign capital and know-how for a swift and successful industrialization of Russia. The fact that Western countries were actually prepared to make this useful contribution made him wonder; he wrote: ‘Why create with their own hands an even more terrible enemy? For me it is evident that, in giving us capital, foreign countries commit a political error, and my only desire is that their blindness should continue for as long as possible.’1 In Chapter 10 we quoted several Communist officials making the same point: why do the capitalist nations allow the transfer of their technology, know-how and other worthwhile commodities which will eventually diminish their own military power? According to several historians, the West has indeed made a considerable contribution to the industrialization of the Soviet Union. Anthony Sutton, for instance, has argued in his triptych Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development (1968–1973) that Western exports of technology, know-how and management techniques have formed the major impetus for Soviet economic development since the birth of the Bolshevik state.2 Without East-West trade the USSR would probably not have survived its own inefficiency.

Keywords

Sugar Europe Petroleum Transportation Coherence 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Nove, The Economic History of the USSR (1969) p. 18.Google Scholar
  2. 5.
    Hirschman, National Power (1980) p. 61.Google Scholar
  3. 6.
    Wiles, ‘Is an Anti-Soviet Embargo Desirable or Possible?’, in Adelphi Paper (1984) p. 42.Google Scholar
  4. 11.
    Goldman, Détente and Dollars (1975) p. 50.Google Scholar
  5. 13.
    McIntyre and Cupitt, ‘East-West Strategic Trade Control: Crumbling Consensus?’, in Survey (1980) p. 107.Google Scholar
  6. 15.
    National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, Balancing the National Interest. U.S. National Security Export Controls and Global Economic Competition (1987) p. 71.Google Scholar
  7. 16.
    Goldman, Détente and Dollars (1975) p. 48.Google Scholar
  8. 18.
    Funigiello, American-Soviet Trade (1988) p. 30.Google Scholar
  9. 19.
    Bertsch, ‘Fast-West Strategic Trade, COCOM and the Atlantic Alliance’, Atlantic Papers (1983) p. 13.Google Scholar
  10. 20.
    Funigiello, American-Soviet Trade (1988) p. 32.Google Scholar
  11. 23.
    Funigiello, American-Soviet Trade (1988) p. 47.Google Scholar
  12. 26.
    Funigiello, American-Soviet Trade (1988) p. 78.Google Scholar
  13. 27.
    Hanson, Western Economic Statecraft (1988) p. 28.Google Scholar
  14. 30.
    Bertsch, ‘Fast-West Strategic Trade’ (1983) pp. 34, 35.Google Scholar
  15. 31.
    Sutton, National Suicide (1974) p. 18.Google Scholar
  16. 32.
    Wiles, ‘Anti-Soviet Embargo’ (1984) p. 47.Google Scholar
  17. 33.
    Mastanduno, ‘Trade as a Strategic Weapon’ (1988) p. 132.Google Scholar
  18. 34.
    Stent, Technology Transfer to the Soviet Union (1983) p. 2.Google Scholar
  19. 35.
    Funigiello, American-Soviet Trade (1988) p. 216.Google Scholar
  20. 36.
    Rode and Jacobsen (eds), Economic Warfare or Détente (1985) p. 132Google Scholar
  21. Becker, Economic Relations with the USSR. Issues for the Western Alliance (1983) p. 136.Google Scholar
  22. 37.
    Rode and Jacobsen (eds), Economic Warfare or Détente (1985) pp. 148, 149Google Scholar
  23. 39.
    Bertsch (ed.), Controlling East-West Trade and Technology Transfer. (1988) p. 235.Google Scholar
  24. 41.
    Perle, ‘The Strategic Implications of West-East Technology Transfer’, in Adelphi Paper (1984) p. 23.Google Scholar
  25. 42.
    Bertsch, ‘Fast-West Strategic Trade’ (1983) p. 20.Google Scholar
  26. 44.
    J. Feldman, ‘Trade Policy and Foreign Policy’, in The Washington Quarterly (1985) p. 73.Google Scholar
  27. 46.
    Perle, ‘Anti-Soviet Embargo’ (1984) p. 23.Google Scholar
  28. 47.
    Feldman, ‘Trade Policy and Foreign Policy’ (1985) p. 73.Google Scholar
  29. 48.
    Parrott (ed.), Trade, Technology, and Soviet-American Relations (1985) p. 267.Google Scholar
  30. 49.
    Perle, ‘Strategic Implications’ (1984) p. 27.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Peter van Ham 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter van Ham
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Political ScienceUniversity of LeidenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations