Advertisement

Cambodia in Conflict

  • Michael Leifer
Part of the St Antony’s/Macmillan Series book series

Abstract

This chapter assesses the likely connection between the remarkable changes in major power relations set in train from the second half of the 1980s and the Cambodian conflict which began in the late 1970s.

Keywords

Khmer Rouge United Nations Security Council American Policy Soviet Policy Political Settlement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    For the international context at the outbreak of the Cambodian conflict, see D. W. P. Elliot (ed.), The Third Indochina Conflict (Boulder Co.: Westview Press, 1981);Google Scholar
  2. 2a.
    G. Evans and K. Rowley, Red Brotherhood at War (London: Verso, 1984);Google Scholar
  3. 2b.
    Chang Pao-min, Kampuchea Between China and Vietnam (Singapore University Press: 1985);Google Scholar
  4. 2c.
    N. Chanda, Brother Enemy (San Diego, Cal.: Harcourt Brace, 1986);Google Scholar
  5. 2d.
    R. Ross, The Indochina Tangle (New York: Columbia University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
  6. 4.
    Mikhail Gorbachev, Peace and Security for the Asian-Pacific Ocean Region (Moscow: Novosti, 1986).Google Scholar
  7. 5.
    Michael Leifer, Cambodia: An Australian Peace Proposal, (Canberra: Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, 1990).Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    For critical discussion of American policy, see F. Z. Brown, Second Chance: The United States and Indochina in the 1990s (New York & London: Council on Foreign Relations Press, 1989); and J. McAuliff and M. B. McDonnell, ‘America’s Obstructionist Role in Indochina’, World Policy Journal, (winter 1989–90).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Leifer

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations