“Right Diameter-First Cut” Lathe Datuming Probe

  • F. Nickols
  • K. F. Martin
Chapter

Abstract

A review of existing tool datuming techniques applied to lathes is made and their advantages and disadvantages outlined. Existing techniques suffer from one or more of three drawbacks. These are that the methods are firstly either susceptible to machine tool thermal growth resulting in a diametrical error of the workpiece or, secondly, the absolute position of the tool tip with respect to the spindle centre is not known. A third drawback with some techniques is that a trial cut has to be made followed by compensation of the radial position of the tool tip. A new device [1] is described which overcomes these drawbacks. It is a simple portable device that is loaded into the chuck of a machine tool. The device, known as a lathe datuming probe, consists of a datum cylinder whose diameter is accurately known. The mechanism of the lathe datuming probe enables the datum cylinder to be touch sensitive to engagement by the tool tip. A prototype probe has been constructed and tests carried out on a CNC lathe.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    F. NICKOLS, Apparaturs and method for datuming machine tools to cut a target diameter accurately. UK Patent appl. 9003113.9A. Filed 12th Feb. 1990.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Renishaw catalogue, Part No. H/2000/3070. Probes in 2 Renishaw catalogue, Part no. H/2000/3070. Probes in action. Renishaw Metrology Ltd., New Mills, Wotton-under-Edge, Glos. GL12 8JR U.K. Tel. 0453–844211.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Renishaw catalogue, Part No. H/2000/3090. LP2 probe with LT02 optical transmission system for CNC lathes. Address as in [2].Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Renishaw catalogue, Part No. H/2000/2100/A. Modular workpiece inspection and tool datuming system for CNC lathes and machining centres. Address as in [2].Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D.R. McMURTRY, Gauging workpice dimensions. U.K. Pat. appl. 2061146A. Filed 20th Oct. 1980.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    D.R. McMURTRY, Measuring workpiece dimensions. U.K. Pat. appl. 2069142. Filed 26 Jan. 1981.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    N-T Toolsetter by Nakamura. Information available from Mills Marketing Services, Barnard Road, Bowthorpe, Norwich. Tel: 0603–742268.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. SZAFARCZYK M. and M. MISILEWSKI, Automatic measurement and correction of workpiece diameter on NC centre. Annals of the CIRP, Vol. 32, No. 1.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Martin K.F., In process measurement. Int. Conf. on Manufacturing Systems and Environment-MSET21, Japan Soc. of Mech. Engrs., Tokyo, June 1990, pp. 87–92.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. SHIRAISHI. In process control of workpiece dimension in turning. Annals of CIRP v.28/1/1979, pp. 333–337.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. NOVAK. Sensing workpiece diameter, vibration and out-of-roundness by Laser-way to automatic quality control. Annals of CIRP v.30/1/1981, pp. 473–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    C.A. LUTTERVELT et al. Stiffness measurement as a check of machine tool spindles. Annals of CIRP V.31/1/82, pp. 251–254.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Nickols
    • 1
  • K. F. Martin
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Electrical, Electronic & Systems Engineering, College of CardiffUniversity of WalesUK

Personalised recommendations