Skip to main content

Strategies for Exploiting Emerging Programming Philosophies to Re-Invigorate Group Technology

  • Chapter
Book cover Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth International Matador Conference
  • 88 Accesses

Summary

Far from being an outdated Manufacturing Systems Engineering methodology, Group Technology (GT) is becoming more relevant with the continuing reduction of product life cycles and the increasing variety of generically similar products being manufactured. However, combinatorial complexity, the explosion of information links as problem size increases, has historically limited the effectiveness of this manufacturing philosophy. The tight limits imposed on information incorporated into the systems design (by the factorial effects encountered at large data volumes) have always made GT implementations vulnerable to changes in their demand environment. This paper presents analysis which demonstrates how combinatorial complexity can be kept under control. This is achieved using established computer programming approaches which have only recently found application on a large scale in this area. In particular the utility for GT systems design of Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) is discussed. The potential of such programming philosophies is demonstrated in the Cell Formation system AGATHA (Adaptive Group Analysis Through Heuristic Alterations), using production data from a local batch manufacturing company.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. V.B. Solaja and S.M. Urosevic (1969): “Optimization of Group Technology Lines by Methods Developed in IAMA, Beograd”, list ILO Seminar on Group Technology. Turin, Italy, pp. 157–176.

    Google Scholar 

  2. F.R.E. Durie (1970): “A Survey of Group Technology and its Potential for User Application in the UK”, Production Engineer 49/2, pp. 51–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. G.A.B. Edwards (1971): Group Technology, Machinery Publishing Company, Brighton, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  4. I. Ham, K. Hitomi and T. Yoshida (1985): Group Technology, Kluwer-Nijhoff, Boston, MA, USA.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Scicon (1990): “SUPERCAPES — Computer Aided Process Planning and Estimating”, SD-Scicon Ltd, Milton Keynes, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Scicon (1990): “SUPERCAPES/MICLASS — Group Technology — Its Benefits and Cost Savings”, SD-Scicon, Milton Keynes, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ingersoll (1990): Competitive Manufacturing — The Quiet Revolution, Ingersoll Engineers, Rugby, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Houtzeel (1975): “MICLASS, A Classification System Based on Group Technology”, SME Publication MS75–721.

    Google Scholar 

  9. F. Koenigsberger and S.A. Tobias (1974): 14th Machine Tool Design and Research Conference, Manchester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  10. S.P. Mitrofanov (1959): The Scientific Principles of Group Technology, English Translation (1966): National Lending Library for Science and Technology, Wetherby, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R.E. Flanders (1925): “Design, Manufacture and Production Control of a Standard Machine”, Transactions of the A S M E 46/1933, pp. 691–738.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J.C. Kerr (1939): “Planning in a General Engineering Shop”, Journal of Production Engineering 17/1, pp. 15–36.

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Korling (1949): “Group Production and its Influence on Productivity”, International Congress of Engineering Manufacture, Paris, France.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. Leonard and K. Rathmill (1977): “The Group Technology Myths”, Management Today 77/1, pp. 66–69.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J.L. Burbidge (1978): “Whatever Happened to GT?”, Management Today 78/9, pp. 87–90.

    Google Scholar 

  16. E.K. Ivanov (1963): Group Production Organisation and Technology, English Translation (1968): Business Publications, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Z.G. Tsyrin (1963): Organizatsiya Gruppovogo Proizvodstva, Gosinti, Moscow, USSR.

    Google Scholar 

  18. V.A. Petrov (1966): Flow Line Group Production Planning., English Translation (1968): Business Publications, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  19. C.C. Gallagher and W.A. Knight (1973): Group Technology Production Methods in Manufacture (First Edition), Ellis Horwood, Chichester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J.L. Burbidge (1963): “Production Flow Analysis”, Production Engineer 42/12, pp. 742–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. C. De Beer and J. De Witte (1978): “Production Flow Synthesis: A Panacea for the Design of Product Oriented Production Systems?”, Annals of the CIRP 27/1, pp. 389–392.

    Google Scholar 

  22. J.R. King and V. Nakornchai (1982): “Machine-Component Grouping in Production Flow Analysis: Review and Extension”, International Journal of Production Research. 20/2, pp. 117–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. J. Dekleva and D. Menart (1987): “Extensions of Production Flow Analysis”, Jrnl. of Manufacturing Systems 6/2, pp. 93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. J.A. Brandon, H. Schhfer and G.Q. Huang: “An Approach to Production Flow Analysis Using Concepts from Information Theory”, Expert Planning Systems, Brighton, UK, pp. 124–129.

    Google Scholar 

  25. R.M. Pirsig (1974): Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance, Corgi/transworld, London, UK, p. 158.

    Google Scholar 

  26. J.A. Brandon and G.Q. Huang (1989): “Strategic Issues for Knowledge Based Systems in the Design of Manufacturing Systems”, 4th Intl. Conference on Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Engineering, Cambridge, UK, pp. 35–48.

    Google Scholar 

  27. C. Knox (1980): “CAD/CAM and Group Technology; The Answer to Systems Integration”, Industrial Engineering 12/11, pp. 66–73.

    Google Scholar 

  28. O.H. Bray (1988): Computer Integrated Manufacturing, Digital, Bedford, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  29. R.L. Harmon and L.D. Peterson (1990): Reinventing the Factory, Free Press, NY, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  30. A. Kurimoto and K. So (1990): “CIM — Manufacturing Strategy”, Expert Planning Systems, Brighton, UK, pp. 6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  31. H.-P. Arndt (1991): “Gruppenarbeit: schlank und rank” (Group Work: Lean & Mean), Wirtschaftswoche 32/91, pp. 56–62.

    Google Scholar 

  32. R. Wild (1985): “Decision Making in Operations Management”, in V. Bignell et al. (eds.): Manufacturing Systems, Blackwell, NY, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Byte (1990): “State-of the-Art: OOP”, Byte 10/90, pp. 206–265 (see also special issues on OOP: Byte 8/81, pp. 74–194 or 8/86, pp. 136–233)

    Google Scholar 

  34. H. Schdfer (1991): Group Technology Information Management for Effective Cell Formation. Ph.D. thesis, University of Wales, Cardiff, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  35. H. Schäfer and J.A. Brandon (1991): “The New Face of Group Technology in the Light of Recent Developments in Information Technology”, Factory Automation and Information Management. Limerick, Ireland, pp. 292–301.

    Google Scholar 

  36. D.A. Waterman (1986): A Guide to Expert Systems, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  37. A. Kusiak (1987); “An Expert System for Group Technology”, Industrial Engineering. 19/10, pp. 56–61.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Z. Leskowsky, L. Logan and A. Vanelli (1987): “Group Technology Decision Aids in an Expert System for Plant Layout”, in A. Kusiak (ed.): Modern Production Management Systems, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, pp. 561–585.

    Google Scholar 

  39. I. Ham, E.V. Goncalves and C.P. Han (1988): “An Integrated Approach to Group Technology Part Family Data Base Design Based on Artificial Intelligence Techniques”, Annals of the CIRP 37/1, pp. 433–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. G. Harhalakis, J.M. Proth and X.L. Xie (1990): “Manufacturing Cell Design Using Simulated Annealing: An Industrial Application”, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 1/3, pp. 185–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. E.G. John (1985): “A Solution to Machine Group Analysis Employing Auxiliary Cell Formation”, First National Conference on Production Research, Nottingham, UK, pp. 95–100.

    Google Scholar 

  42. H. Schäfer (1989): The Computational Implementation of Group Technology Through Auxiliary Ceel Formation MBA thesis, Cardiff Business School, Cardiff, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  43. E.G. John and H. Schäfer (1990): “The Computational Implementation of a Cell Formation Technique-Incorporating Consideration of Process Sequence”, Factory 2001, Cambridge, UK, pp. 125–129.

    Google Scholar 

  44. J.L. Burbidge (1975): The Introduction of Group Technology, Heinemann, London, UK, p. 127.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1992 Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brandon, J.A., Schäfer, H. (1992). Strategies for Exploiting Emerging Programming Philosophies to Re-Invigorate Group Technology. In: Atkinson, J., Barrow, G., Burdekin, M., Chitkara, N.R., Hannam, R.G. (eds) Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth International Matador Conference. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-12433-6_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-12433-6_25

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-12435-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-12433-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics